Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Gwalior region of Central India: A comparative study using NCEP ATP III, IDF and Harmonized criteria

• Published in: Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews 2019-01, Vol.13 (1), p.816-821
• Main Authors: Subramani, Senthil Kumar, Mahajan, Sunil, Chauhan, Pratibha, Yadav, Dhananjay, Mishra, Meerambika, Pakkirisamy, Umamaheswari, Prasad, G.B.K.S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Central India; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Harmonized criteria; Humans; India - epidemiology; Internationality; Male; Metabolic syndrome; Metabolic Syndrome - blood; Metabolic Syndrome - diagnosis; Metabolic Syndrome - epidemiology; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic - standards; Prevalence; Societies, Medical - standards; Type II diabetes; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1871-4021; 1878-0334
• DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.12.003

The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of Metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the people of Gwalior. Three criteria viz., National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria and Harmonized criteria for MetS were employed to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in this region, their concordance with respect to this population was recorded. The cross-sectional study involved the people, who had attended the Diabetes clinic at the Centre for Translational Research, Jiwaji University during 2015-2017. A total of 1190 participants within the age group of 20–79 years of either gender were included in the study. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, blood glucose and lipid profile of all subjects were assessed. Student's ‘t’ test, Kappa statistics and Binary logistic regression model were used to analyze the data. The percentage of prevalent MetS was found to be 72.7, 50.2 and 53.9 following Harmonized criteria, NCEP ATPIII and IDF criteria respectively. The prevalence was found to be maximum in centrally obese female population, aged between 51 and 60 years with the presence of hyperglycemia and reduced HDL– C. Harmonized and IDF criteria showed good agreement (κ 0.85). Regression analysis showed that, high body mass index, hypertension and dyslipedimia were the most critical predictive risk factors of MetS. Maximum prevalence of MetS was recorded when the Harmonized criteria was followed. A good agreement was observed between Harmonized vs. IDF criteria. MetS if detected early especially in apparently healthy subjects; paves way for preventive measures to be designed in order to avert the incidence of diabetes and other risks related to cardio vascular disease.