Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Clinical trials have demonstrated some benefits of electromyogram-triggered/controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES) on motor recovery of upper limb (UL) function in patients with stroke. However, EMG-NMES use in clinical practice is limited due to a lack of evidence su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2019-02, Vol.33 (2), p.96-111
Main Authors: Monte-Silva, Katia, Piscitelli, Daniele, Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid, Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique, Archambault, Philippe, Levin, Mindy F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-509c247661580d054179a89cf73e7c59e36c1ee0d15cdd1c6626c97e9f8e782c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-509c247661580d054179a89cf73e7c59e36c1ee0d15cdd1c6626c97e9f8e782c3
container_end_page 111
container_issue 2
container_start_page 96
container_title Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
container_volume 33
creator Monte-Silva, Katia
Piscitelli, Daniele
Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid
Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique
Archambault, Philippe
Levin, Mindy F.
description Background. Clinical trials have demonstrated some benefits of electromyogram-triggered/controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES) on motor recovery of upper limb (UL) function in patients with stroke. However, EMG-NMES use in clinical practice is limited due to a lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness. Objective. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of EMG-NMES on stroke UL recovery based on each of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. Methods. Database searches identified clinical trials comparing the effect of EMG-NMES versus no treatment or another treatment on stroke upper extremity motor recovery. A meta-analysis was done for outcomes at each ICF domain (Body Structure and Function, Activity and Participation) at posttest (short-term) and follow-up periods. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on stroke chronicity (acute/subacute, chronic phases). Sensitivity analysis was done by removing studies rated as poor or fair quality (PEDro score
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1545968319826053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179468350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1545968319826053</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2179468350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-509c247661580d054179a89cf73e7c59e36c1ee0d15cdd1c6626c97e9f8e782c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw54R85BKwE_-Jua2qlq3UAmpBHCPjTFYudrx4nKL9OHxTvN3CAYmLbY3f-41mHiEvOXvDudZvuRTSqL7jpm8Vk90jcsylbBvVC_F4_xay2f8fkWeIt4y1XW_YU3LUMc1Ep9Qx-XUWwJWc4i5tso3NNQRbYKQfYKnFBd0SbKYHkXc20JviY60Vn2Y6pUyvAUvKft7Qr9ljoXYe6Xp_XKU7iDAX6mf6KWHB2uU70DVEvw2w8fYdXdGbHRaIleYq6M7Dz3v_FRTbrGYbdujxOXky2YDw4uE-IV_Ozz6frpvLj-8vTleXjRNClkYy41qhleKyZyOTgmtje-Mm3YF20kCnHAdgI5duHLlTqlXOaDBTD7pvXXdCXh-425x-LHWqIXp0EIKdIS04tBUo6i4lq1J2kLqcEDNMwzb7aPNu4GzYBzP8G0y1vHqgL98ijH8Nf5KoguYgQLuB4TYtuc6P_wf-BhXKmE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179468350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Monte-Silva, Katia ; Piscitelli, Daniele ; Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid ; Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique ; Archambault, Philippe ; Levin, Mindy F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Monte-Silva, Katia ; Piscitelli, Daniele ; Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid ; Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique ; Archambault, Philippe ; Levin, Mindy F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Clinical trials have demonstrated some benefits of electromyogram-triggered/controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES) on motor recovery of upper limb (UL) function in patients with stroke. However, EMG-NMES use in clinical practice is limited due to a lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness. Objective. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of EMG-NMES on stroke UL recovery based on each of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. Methods. Database searches identified clinical trials comparing the effect of EMG-NMES versus no treatment or another treatment on stroke upper extremity motor recovery. A meta-analysis was done for outcomes at each ICF domain (Body Structure and Function, Activity and Participation) at posttest (short-term) and follow-up periods. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on stroke chronicity (acute/subacute, chronic phases). Sensitivity analysis was done by removing studies rated as poor or fair quality (PEDro score &lt;6). Results. Twenty-six studies (782 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Fifty percent of them were considered to be of high quality. The meta-analysis showed that EMG-NMES has a robust short-term effect on improving UL motor impairment in the Body Structure and Function domain. No evidence was found in favor of EMG-NMES for the Activity and Participation domain. EMG-NMES had a stronger effect for each ICF domain in chronic (≥3 months) compared to acute/subacute phases. Conclusion. EMG-NMES is effective in the short term in improving UL impairment in individuals with chronic stroke.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1545968319826053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30704366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2019-02, Vol.33 (2), p.96-111</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-509c247661580d054179a89cf73e7c59e36c1ee0d15cdd1c6626c97e9f8e782c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-509c247661580d054179a89cf73e7c59e36c1ee0d15cdd1c6626c97e9f8e782c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5240-3798</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27921,27923,27924,79235</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monte-Silva, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piscitelli, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archambault, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Mindy F.</creatorcontrib><title>Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair</title><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><description>Background. Clinical trials have demonstrated some benefits of electromyogram-triggered/controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES) on motor recovery of upper limb (UL) function in patients with stroke. However, EMG-NMES use in clinical practice is limited due to a lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness. Objective. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of EMG-NMES on stroke UL recovery based on each of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. Methods. Database searches identified clinical trials comparing the effect of EMG-NMES versus no treatment or another treatment on stroke upper extremity motor recovery. A meta-analysis was done for outcomes at each ICF domain (Body Structure and Function, Activity and Participation) at posttest (short-term) and follow-up periods. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on stroke chronicity (acute/subacute, chronic phases). Sensitivity analysis was done by removing studies rated as poor or fair quality (PEDro score &lt;6). Results. Twenty-six studies (782 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Fifty percent of them were considered to be of high quality. The meta-analysis showed that EMG-NMES has a robust short-term effect on improving UL motor impairment in the Body Structure and Function domain. No evidence was found in favor of EMG-NMES for the Activity and Participation domain. EMG-NMES had a stronger effect for each ICF domain in chronic (≥3 months) compared to acute/subacute phases. Conclusion. EMG-NMES is effective in the short term in improving UL impairment in individuals with chronic stroke.</description><issn>1545-9683</issn><issn>1552-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw54R85BKwE_-Jua2qlq3UAmpBHCPjTFYudrx4nKL9OHxTvN3CAYmLbY3f-41mHiEvOXvDudZvuRTSqL7jpm8Vk90jcsylbBvVC_F4_xay2f8fkWeIt4y1XW_YU3LUMc1Ep9Qx-XUWwJWc4i5tso3NNQRbYKQfYKnFBd0SbKYHkXc20JviY60Vn2Y6pUyvAUvKft7Qr9ljoXYe6Xp_XKU7iDAX6mf6KWHB2uU70DVEvw2w8fYdXdGbHRaIleYq6M7Dz3v_FRTbrGYbdujxOXky2YDw4uE-IV_Ozz6frpvLj-8vTleXjRNClkYy41qhleKyZyOTgmtje-Mm3YF20kCnHAdgI5duHLlTqlXOaDBTD7pvXXdCXh-425x-LHWqIXp0EIKdIS04tBUo6i4lq1J2kLqcEDNMwzb7aPNu4GzYBzP8G0y1vHqgL98ijH8Nf5KoguYgQLuB4TYtuc6P_wf-BhXKmE0</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Monte-Silva, Katia</creator><creator>Piscitelli, Daniele</creator><creator>Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid</creator><creator>Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique</creator><creator>Archambault, Philippe</creator><creator>Levin, Mindy F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-3798</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Monte-Silva, Katia ; Piscitelli, Daniele ; Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid ; Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique ; Archambault, Philippe ; Levin, Mindy F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-509c247661580d054179a89cf73e7c59e36c1ee0d15cdd1c6626c97e9f8e782c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monte-Silva, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piscitelli, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archambault, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Mindy F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monte-Silva, Katia</au><au>Piscitelli, Daniele</au><au>Norouzi-Gheidari, Nahid</au><au>Batalla, Marc Aureli Pique</au><au>Archambault, Philippe</au><au>Levin, Mindy F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair</jtitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>96-111</pages><issn>1545-9683</issn><eissn>1552-6844</eissn><abstract>Background. Clinical trials have demonstrated some benefits of electromyogram-triggered/controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES) on motor recovery of upper limb (UL) function in patients with stroke. However, EMG-NMES use in clinical practice is limited due to a lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness. Objective. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of EMG-NMES on stroke UL recovery based on each of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains. Methods. Database searches identified clinical trials comparing the effect of EMG-NMES versus no treatment or another treatment on stroke upper extremity motor recovery. A meta-analysis was done for outcomes at each ICF domain (Body Structure and Function, Activity and Participation) at posttest (short-term) and follow-up periods. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on stroke chronicity (acute/subacute, chronic phases). Sensitivity analysis was done by removing studies rated as poor or fair quality (PEDro score &lt;6). Results. Twenty-six studies (782 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Fifty percent of them were considered to be of high quality. The meta-analysis showed that EMG-NMES has a robust short-term effect on improving UL motor impairment in the Body Structure and Function domain. No evidence was found in favor of EMG-NMES for the Activity and Participation domain. EMG-NMES had a stronger effect for each ICF domain in chronic (≥3 months) compared to acute/subacute phases. Conclusion. EMG-NMES is effective in the short term in improving UL impairment in individuals with chronic stroke.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30704366</pmid><doi>10.1177/1545968319826053</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-3798</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-9683
ispartof Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2019-02, Vol.33 (2), p.96-111
issn 1545-9683
1552-6844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2179468350
source SAGE
title Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromyogram-Related%20Neuromuscular%20Electrical%20Stimulation%20for%20Restoring%20Wrist%20and%20Hand%20Movement%20in%20Poststroke%20Hemiplegia:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20Neural%20Repair&rft.au=Monte-Silva,%20Katia&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=96-111&rft.issn=1545-9683&rft.eissn=1552-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1545968319826053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2179468350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-509c247661580d054179a89cf73e7c59e36c1ee0d15cdd1c6626c97e9f8e782c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179468350&rft_id=info:pmid/30704366&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1545968319826053&rfr_iscdi=true