The subjective-objective deficit paradox in schizotypy extends to emotion regulation and awareness

• Published in: Journal of psychiatric research 2019-04, Vol.111, p.160-168
• Main Authors: Li, Lilian Yanqing, Karcher, Nicole R., Kerns, John G., Fung, Christie K., Martin, Elizabeth A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Emotion regulation; Emotional awareness; Magical ideation; Perceptual aberration; Schizotypy; Social anhedonia
• ISSN: 0022-3956; 1879-1379
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.01.026

There is an emerging subjective-objective deficit paradox in schizotypy. Individuals with schizotypy report severe subjective complaints in several key functional domains commensurate with that of individuals with schizophrenia. However, objective assessments of the same domains show relatively intact performance. We examined whether this subjective-objective deficit paradox extends to two closely linked affective processes: emotion regulation and awareness. Individuals with elevated social anhedonia (SocAnh; n = 61) and elevated perceptual aberration/magical ideation (PerMag; n = 73) were compared to control participants (n = 81) on subjective and objective measures of emotion regulation and awareness. Subjective measures included self-report questionnaires assessing regulatory ability, attention to emotion, and emotional clarity. Implicit emotion regulation was assessed by the Emotion Regulation-Implicit Association Test (ER-IAT) while objective emotional awareness was assessed by the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS), a performance-based test. Results showed that both SocAnh and PerMag groups reported notable deficits in almost all subjective measures relative to controls (composite ds > 0.55). In contrast, performance on ER-IAT and LEAS was very similar to controls (composite ds