Loading…

Three-breed rotational crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein compared with Holstein cows for feed efficiency, income over feed cost, and residual feed intake

Rotational 3-breed crossbred cows of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein (CB) were compared with Holstein (HO) cows for alternative measures of feed efficiency as well as income over feed cost (IOFC) and residual feed intake (RFI) during the first 150 d of first, second, and third lactations. Pri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science 2019-04, Vol.102 (4), p.3661-3673
Main Authors: Shonka-Martin, B.N., Heins, B.J., Hansen, L.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3b2814a77fe3f10c6c7fcd10c716d9a48a1dfa20104bbb79fbd06141d266ae23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3b2814a77fe3f10c6c7fcd10c716d9a48a1dfa20104bbb79fbd06141d266ae23
container_end_page 3673
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3661
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 102
creator Shonka-Martin, B.N.
Heins, B.J.
Hansen, L.B.
description Rotational 3-breed crossbred cows of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein (CB) were compared with Holstein (HO) cows for alternative measures of feed efficiency as well as income over feed cost (IOFC) and residual feed intake (RFI) during the first 150 d of first, second, and third lactations. Primiparous and multiparous CB (n = 63 and n = 43, respectively) and HO (n = 60 and n = 37, respectively) cows were fed the same total mixed ration twice daily with refusals weighed once daily. Feed was analyzed for dry matter content, net energy for lactation, and crude protein content. Body weight (BW) was recorded twice weekly. Daily production of milk, fat, and protein were estimated from monthly test days with best prediction. Measures of efficiency from 4 to 150 d in milk (DIM) were feed conversion efficiency (FCE), defined as fat plus protein production (kg) per kilogram of dry matter intake (DMI); ECM/DMI, defined as kilograms of energy-corrected milk (ECM) per kilogram of DMI; net energy for lactation efficiency (NELE), defined as ECM (kg) per megacalorie of net energy for lactation intake; crude protein efficiency (CPE), defined as true protein production (kg) per kilogram of crude protein intake; and DMI/BW, defined as DMI (kg) per kilogram of BW. The IOFC was defined as revenue from fat plus protein production minus feed cost. The RFI from 4 to 150 DIM for each lactation was the residual error remaining from regression of DMI on milk energy output (Mcal), metabolic BW, and energy required for change in BW (Mcal). Statistical analysis of measures of feed efficiency and RFI for primiparous cows included the fixed effects of year of calving and breed group. For multiparous cows, statistical analysis included breed as a fixed effect and cow as a repeated effect nested within breed group. Primiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+5.5%), ECM/DMI (+4.0%), NELE (+4.0%), and CPE (+5.2%) and a lower mean DMI/BW (–5.3%) than primiparous HO cows. Primiparous CB cows ($875) also had higher mean IOFC than primiparous HO cows ($825). In addition, mean RFI from 4 to 150 DIM was significantly lower (more desirable) for primiparous CB cows than HO cows. Likewise, multiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+8.2%), ECM/DMI (+5.9%), NELE (+5.8%), and CPE (+8.1%) and a lower mean for DMI/BW (–4.8%) than multiparous HO cows. Multiparous CB cows ($1,296) also had a higher mean for IOFC than multiparous HO cows ($1,208) and a lower mean for RFI from 4 to 150 DIM than HO
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2018-15682
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183186442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030219301547</els_id><sourcerecordid>2183186442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3b2814a77fe3f10c6c7fcd10c716d9a48a1dfa20104bbb79fbd06141d266ae23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUtPGzEYtCoQSSnXHpGPHLLBj82uc0QRlEpUlVDUq-W1PxfDxg62Q5SfxIFf0T9W51HUCxc_xjNjewahr5SMOW3E5aNJY0aoqOikEewTGtIJm1ScTsURGhLCWEU4YQP0OaXHsqWMTE7QgJO2ZYTxIXqbP0SAqiuDwTFklV3wqsc6hpQKahIOFv8IPnd_XnunooER_uWenP-N78GMsPIG34Y-ZXAe67BYqiLCa5cf_ofXCdsQsd3eAtY67cDrzQg7XySAwwscDnVIeW8aITmzKk_Z4c5n9QRf0LFVfYKzw3yK5jfX89ltdffz2_fZ1V2luahzxTsmaK3a1gK3lOhGt1absmhpY6aqFooaq0pspO66rp3azpCG1tSwplHA-Cm62NsuY3heQcpy4ZKGvlcewipJRgWnoqnrLXW8p-4Ci2DlMrqFihtJidw2JEtDctuQ3DVUBOcH71W3APNO_1dJIYg9AcoHXxxEmXZpgXERdJYmuI-8_wLNXaLH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183186442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-breed rotational crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein compared with Holstein cows for feed efficiency, income over feed cost, and residual feed intake</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Shonka-Martin, B.N. ; Heins, B.J. ; Hansen, L.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shonka-Martin, B.N. ; Heins, B.J. ; Hansen, L.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Rotational 3-breed crossbred cows of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein (CB) were compared with Holstein (HO) cows for alternative measures of feed efficiency as well as income over feed cost (IOFC) and residual feed intake (RFI) during the first 150 d of first, second, and third lactations. Primiparous and multiparous CB (n = 63 and n = 43, respectively) and HO (n = 60 and n = 37, respectively) cows were fed the same total mixed ration twice daily with refusals weighed once daily. Feed was analyzed for dry matter content, net energy for lactation, and crude protein content. Body weight (BW) was recorded twice weekly. Daily production of milk, fat, and protein were estimated from monthly test days with best prediction. Measures of efficiency from 4 to 150 d in milk (DIM) were feed conversion efficiency (FCE), defined as fat plus protein production (kg) per kilogram of dry matter intake (DMI); ECM/DMI, defined as kilograms of energy-corrected milk (ECM) per kilogram of DMI; net energy for lactation efficiency (NELE), defined as ECM (kg) per megacalorie of net energy for lactation intake; crude protein efficiency (CPE), defined as true protein production (kg) per kilogram of crude protein intake; and DMI/BW, defined as DMI (kg) per kilogram of BW. The IOFC was defined as revenue from fat plus protein production minus feed cost. The RFI from 4 to 150 DIM for each lactation was the residual error remaining from regression of DMI on milk energy output (Mcal), metabolic BW, and energy required for change in BW (Mcal). Statistical analysis of measures of feed efficiency and RFI for primiparous cows included the fixed effects of year of calving and breed group. For multiparous cows, statistical analysis included breed as a fixed effect and cow as a repeated effect nested within breed group. Primiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+5.5%), ECM/DMI (+4.0%), NELE (+4.0%), and CPE (+5.2%) and a lower mean DMI/BW (–5.3%) than primiparous HO cows. Primiparous CB cows ($875) also had higher mean IOFC than primiparous HO cows ($825). In addition, mean RFI from 4 to 150 DIM was significantly lower (more desirable) for primiparous CB cows than HO cows. Likewise, multiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+8.2%), ECM/DMI (+5.9%), NELE (+5.8%), and CPE (+8.1%) and a lower mean for DMI/BW (–4.8%) than multiparous HO cows. Multiparous CB cows ($1,296) also had a higher mean for IOFC than multiparous HO cows ($1,208) and a lower mean for RFI from 4 to 150 DIM than HO cows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15682</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30772023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - economics ; Animals ; Body Weight ; Breeding ; Cattle - genetics ; Cattle - physiology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; crossbreeding ; Crosses, Genetic ; Dairying - economics ; Diet - veterinary ; Eating - physiology ; Energy Intake ; Energy Metabolism ; feed efficiency ; Female ; Income ; Lactation - genetics ; Lactation - physiology ; Milk ; Parity ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2019-04, Vol.102 (4), p.3661-3673</ispartof><rights>2019 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3b2814a77fe3f10c6c7fcd10c716d9a48a1dfa20104bbb79fbd06141d266ae23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3b2814a77fe3f10c6c7fcd10c716d9a48a1dfa20104bbb79fbd06141d266ae23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030219301547$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shonka-Martin, B.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heins, B.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, L.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Three-breed rotational crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein compared with Holstein cows for feed efficiency, income over feed cost, and residual feed intake</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Rotational 3-breed crossbred cows of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein (CB) were compared with Holstein (HO) cows for alternative measures of feed efficiency as well as income over feed cost (IOFC) and residual feed intake (RFI) during the first 150 d of first, second, and third lactations. Primiparous and multiparous CB (n = 63 and n = 43, respectively) and HO (n = 60 and n = 37, respectively) cows were fed the same total mixed ration twice daily with refusals weighed once daily. Feed was analyzed for dry matter content, net energy for lactation, and crude protein content. Body weight (BW) was recorded twice weekly. Daily production of milk, fat, and protein were estimated from monthly test days with best prediction. Measures of efficiency from 4 to 150 d in milk (DIM) were feed conversion efficiency (FCE), defined as fat plus protein production (kg) per kilogram of dry matter intake (DMI); ECM/DMI, defined as kilograms of energy-corrected milk (ECM) per kilogram of DMI; net energy for lactation efficiency (NELE), defined as ECM (kg) per megacalorie of net energy for lactation intake; crude protein efficiency (CPE), defined as true protein production (kg) per kilogram of crude protein intake; and DMI/BW, defined as DMI (kg) per kilogram of BW. The IOFC was defined as revenue from fat plus protein production minus feed cost. The RFI from 4 to 150 DIM for each lactation was the residual error remaining from regression of DMI on milk energy output (Mcal), metabolic BW, and energy required for change in BW (Mcal). Statistical analysis of measures of feed efficiency and RFI for primiparous cows included the fixed effects of year of calving and breed group. For multiparous cows, statistical analysis included breed as a fixed effect and cow as a repeated effect nested within breed group. Primiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+5.5%), ECM/DMI (+4.0%), NELE (+4.0%), and CPE (+5.2%) and a lower mean DMI/BW (–5.3%) than primiparous HO cows. Primiparous CB cows ($875) also had higher mean IOFC than primiparous HO cows ($825). In addition, mean RFI from 4 to 150 DIM was significantly lower (more desirable) for primiparous CB cows than HO cows. Likewise, multiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+8.2%), ECM/DMI (+5.9%), NELE (+5.8%), and CPE (+8.1%) and a lower mean for DMI/BW (–4.8%) than multiparous HO cows. Multiparous CB cows ($1,296) also had a higher mean for IOFC than multiparous HO cows ($1,208) and a lower mean for RFI from 4 to 150 DIM than HO cows.</description><subject>Animal Feed - economics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cattle - genetics</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>crossbreeding</subject><subject>Crosses, Genetic</subject><subject>Dairying - economics</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Eating - physiology</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>feed efficiency</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Lactation - genetics</subject><subject>Lactation - physiology</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UUtPGzEYtCoQSSnXHpGPHLLBj82uc0QRlEpUlVDUq-W1PxfDxg62Q5SfxIFf0T9W51HUCxc_xjNjewahr5SMOW3E5aNJY0aoqOikEewTGtIJm1ScTsURGhLCWEU4YQP0OaXHsqWMTE7QgJO2ZYTxIXqbP0SAqiuDwTFklV3wqsc6hpQKahIOFv8IPnd_XnunooER_uWenP-N78GMsPIG34Y-ZXAe67BYqiLCa5cf_ofXCdsQsd3eAtY67cDrzQg7XySAwwscDnVIeW8aITmzKk_Z4c5n9QRf0LFVfYKzw3yK5jfX89ltdffz2_fZ1V2luahzxTsmaK3a1gK3lOhGt1absmhpY6aqFooaq0pspO66rp3azpCG1tSwplHA-Cm62NsuY3heQcpy4ZKGvlcewipJRgWnoqnrLXW8p-4Ci2DlMrqFihtJidw2JEtDctuQ3DVUBOcH71W3APNO_1dJIYg9AcoHXxxEmXZpgXERdJYmuI-8_wLNXaLH</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Shonka-Martin, B.N.</creator><creator>Heins, B.J.</creator><creator>Hansen, L.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Three-breed rotational crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein compared with Holstein cows for feed efficiency, income over feed cost, and residual feed intake</title><author>Shonka-Martin, B.N. ; Heins, B.J. ; Hansen, L.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3b2814a77fe3f10c6c7fcd10c716d9a48a1dfa20104bbb79fbd06141d266ae23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - economics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cattle - genetics</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>crossbreeding</topic><topic>Crosses, Genetic</topic><topic>Dairying - economics</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Eating - physiology</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>feed efficiency</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Lactation - genetics</topic><topic>Lactation - physiology</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shonka-Martin, B.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heins, B.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, L.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shonka-Martin, B.N.</au><au>Heins, B.J.</au><au>Hansen, L.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-breed rotational crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein compared with Holstein cows for feed efficiency, income over feed cost, and residual feed intake</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3661</spage><epage>3673</epage><pages>3661-3673</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Rotational 3-breed crossbred cows of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein (CB) were compared with Holstein (HO) cows for alternative measures of feed efficiency as well as income over feed cost (IOFC) and residual feed intake (RFI) during the first 150 d of first, second, and third lactations. Primiparous and multiparous CB (n = 63 and n = 43, respectively) and HO (n = 60 and n = 37, respectively) cows were fed the same total mixed ration twice daily with refusals weighed once daily. Feed was analyzed for dry matter content, net energy for lactation, and crude protein content. Body weight (BW) was recorded twice weekly. Daily production of milk, fat, and protein were estimated from monthly test days with best prediction. Measures of efficiency from 4 to 150 d in milk (DIM) were feed conversion efficiency (FCE), defined as fat plus protein production (kg) per kilogram of dry matter intake (DMI); ECM/DMI, defined as kilograms of energy-corrected milk (ECM) per kilogram of DMI; net energy for lactation efficiency (NELE), defined as ECM (kg) per megacalorie of net energy for lactation intake; crude protein efficiency (CPE), defined as true protein production (kg) per kilogram of crude protein intake; and DMI/BW, defined as DMI (kg) per kilogram of BW. The IOFC was defined as revenue from fat plus protein production minus feed cost. The RFI from 4 to 150 DIM for each lactation was the residual error remaining from regression of DMI on milk energy output (Mcal), metabolic BW, and energy required for change in BW (Mcal). Statistical analysis of measures of feed efficiency and RFI for primiparous cows included the fixed effects of year of calving and breed group. For multiparous cows, statistical analysis included breed as a fixed effect and cow as a repeated effect nested within breed group. Primiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+5.5%), ECM/DMI (+4.0%), NELE (+4.0%), and CPE (+5.2%) and a lower mean DMI/BW (–5.3%) than primiparous HO cows. Primiparous CB cows ($875) also had higher mean IOFC than primiparous HO cows ($825). In addition, mean RFI from 4 to 150 DIM was significantly lower (more desirable) for primiparous CB cows than HO cows. Likewise, multiparous CB cows had higher means for FCE (+8.2%), ECM/DMI (+5.9%), NELE (+5.8%), and CPE (+8.1%) and a lower mean for DMI/BW (–4.8%) than multiparous HO cows. Multiparous CB cows ($1,296) also had a higher mean for IOFC than multiparous HO cows ($1,208) and a lower mean for RFI from 4 to 150 DIM than HO cows.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30772023</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2018-15682</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2019-04, Vol.102 (4), p.3661-3673
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183186442
source ScienceDirect Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animal Feed - economics
Animals
Body Weight
Breeding
Cattle - genetics
Cattle - physiology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
crossbreeding
Crosses, Genetic
Dairying - economics
Diet - veterinary
Eating - physiology
Energy Intake
Energy Metabolism
feed efficiency
Female
Income
Lactation - genetics
Lactation - physiology
Milk
Parity
Pregnancy
title Three-breed rotational crossbreds of Montbéliarde, Viking Red, and Holstein compared with Holstein cows for feed efficiency, income over feed cost, and residual feed intake
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A59%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-breed%20rotational%20crossbreds%20of%20Montb%C3%A9liarde,%20Viking%20Red,%20and%20Holstein%20compared%20with%20Holstein%20cows%20for%20feed%20efficiency,%20income%20over%20feed%20cost,%20and%20residual%20feed%20intake&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Shonka-Martin,%20B.N.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3661&rft.epage=3673&rft.pages=3661-3673&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2018-15682&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183186442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3b2814a77fe3f10c6c7fcd10c716d9a48a1dfa20104bbb79fbd06141d266ae23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183186442&rft_id=info:pmid/30772023&rfr_iscdi=true