Loading…

Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods

The selection of reference and proficiency chemicals is an important basis for method validation and proficiency evaluations. Reference chemicals are a set of test substances used by a method developer to evaluate the reliability and relevance of a new method, in comparison to reference data (usuall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Toxicology in vitro 2019-06, Vol.57, p.48-53
Main Authors: Kolle, S.N., Hill, E., Raabe, H., Landsiedel, R., Curren, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16ea44cb79d7946033da9254bec2faa9780983a7ad2e5b127477a435a4240f0e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16ea44cb79d7946033da9254bec2faa9780983a7ad2e5b127477a435a4240f0e3
container_end_page 53
container_issue
container_start_page 48
container_title Toxicology in vitro
container_volume 57
creator Kolle, S.N.
Hill, E.
Raabe, H.
Landsiedel, R.
Curren, R.
description The selection of reference and proficiency chemicals is an important basis for method validation and proficiency evaluations. Reference chemicals are a set of test substances used by a method developer to evaluate the reliability and relevance of a new method, in comparison to reference data (usually to a validated reference method). Proficiency chemicals, as defined in OECD Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices, are defined post validation as a subset of the reference chemicals or other chemicals with sufficient supporting data that are used by naïve laboratories to demonstrate technical competence with a validated test method. Proficiency chemicals should cover different physical states, several chemical classes within the applicability domain of the method and yield the full range of responses (in the validated reference method and in vivo), they shall be commercially available (at non-prohibitive costs) and have high quality reference data. If reference and subsequent proficiency chemicals are chosen without sufficient evidence for their inclusion, both test method evaluation and demonstration of technical proficiency can be hampered. In this report we present cases in which the selection of reference chemicals led to problems in the reproduction of the reference results and demonstration of technical proficiency: The variability of results was not always taken into account in selection of several reference substances of the LLNA (OECD TG 429). Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex skin corrosion test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced. Likewise, the expected in vitro result for one of the proficiency chemicals for the BCOP (OECD TG 437) was difficult to reproduce in several labs. Furthermore, it was not possible to obtain one of the proficiency chemicals for the Steroidogenesis Assay (OECD TG 456) at non-prohibitive costs at a reasonable purity. Based on these, we recommend changes of current proficiency chemicals lists with established OECD Test Guidelines and provide recommendations for developing future sets of reference chemicals. •Reference chemicals and proficiency chemicals are needed for method development and technical proficiency assessment•Several reference chemicals of the LLNA (OECD TG 429) were selected though reference data was obtained from single studies•Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced•The res
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.02.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183189351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0887233318307628</els_id><sourcerecordid>2183189351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16ea44cb79d7946033da9254bec2faa9780983a7ad2e5b127477a435a4240f0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMotlZ_gBfZo5ddJ8nuJsGTFK1CQRA9h2x2tk3Z7dZkW_Dfm9KqN-cyDPPmDe8j5JpCRoGWd6tscLuMAVUZsAxAnJAxlUKlnApxSsYgpUgZ53xELkJYAUAhGZyTEQfBZawxmb3hwvjarRfJsMTEY4Me1xZD0vT-b0zsEjtnTRuSvklMO6Bfm_gckw6HZV-HS3LWxC1eHfuEfDw9vk-f0_nr7GX6ME8tV-WQ0hJNnttKqFqovATOa6NYkVdoWWOMEhKU5EaYmmFRUSZyIUzOC5OzHBpAPiG3B9-N7z-3GAbduWCxbc0a-23QjEpOpeIFjVJ6kFrfhxCj6I13nfFfmoLe89MrHSPoPT8NTEd-8ebmaL-tOqx_L36ARcH9QYAx5M6h18G6PaHaebSDrnv3j_03wZyAZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183189351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Kolle, S.N. ; Hill, E. ; Raabe, H. ; Landsiedel, R. ; Curren, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolle, S.N. ; Hill, E. ; Raabe, H. ; Landsiedel, R. ; Curren, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The selection of reference and proficiency chemicals is an important basis for method validation and proficiency evaluations. Reference chemicals are a set of test substances used by a method developer to evaluate the reliability and relevance of a new method, in comparison to reference data (usually to a validated reference method). Proficiency chemicals, as defined in OECD Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices, are defined post validation as a subset of the reference chemicals or other chemicals with sufficient supporting data that are used by naïve laboratories to demonstrate technical competence with a validated test method. Proficiency chemicals should cover different physical states, several chemical classes within the applicability domain of the method and yield the full range of responses (in the validated reference method and in vivo), they shall be commercially available (at non-prohibitive costs) and have high quality reference data. If reference and subsequent proficiency chemicals are chosen without sufficient evidence for their inclusion, both test method evaluation and demonstration of technical proficiency can be hampered. In this report we present cases in which the selection of reference chemicals led to problems in the reproduction of the reference results and demonstration of technical proficiency: The variability of results was not always taken into account in selection of several reference substances of the LLNA (OECD TG 429). Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex skin corrosion test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced. Likewise, the expected in vitro result for one of the proficiency chemicals for the BCOP (OECD TG 437) was difficult to reproduce in several labs. Furthermore, it was not possible to obtain one of the proficiency chemicals for the Steroidogenesis Assay (OECD TG 456) at non-prohibitive costs at a reasonable purity. Based on these, we recommend changes of current proficiency chemicals lists with established OECD Test Guidelines and provide recommendations for developing future sets of reference chemicals. •Reference chemicals and proficiency chemicals are needed for method development and technical proficiency assessment•Several reference chemicals of the LLNA (OECD TG 429) were selected though reference data was obtained from single studies•Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced•The result for one of the proficiency chemicals for the BCOP (OECD TG 437) was difficult to reproduce in several labs•It was not possible to obtain one of the proficiency chemicals for the Steroidogenesis Assay (OECD TG 456)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-2333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.02.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30738888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Toxicology in vitro, 2019-06, Vol.57, p.48-53</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16ea44cb79d7946033da9254bec2faa9780983a7ad2e5b127477a435a4240f0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16ea44cb79d7946033da9254bec2faa9780983a7ad2e5b127477a435a4240f0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3502-1034</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30738888$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolle, S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raabe, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsiedel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curren, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods</title><title>Toxicology in vitro</title><addtitle>Toxicol In Vitro</addtitle><description>The selection of reference and proficiency chemicals is an important basis for method validation and proficiency evaluations. Reference chemicals are a set of test substances used by a method developer to evaluate the reliability and relevance of a new method, in comparison to reference data (usually to a validated reference method). Proficiency chemicals, as defined in OECD Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices, are defined post validation as a subset of the reference chemicals or other chemicals with sufficient supporting data that are used by naïve laboratories to demonstrate technical competence with a validated test method. Proficiency chemicals should cover different physical states, several chemical classes within the applicability domain of the method and yield the full range of responses (in the validated reference method and in vivo), they shall be commercially available (at non-prohibitive costs) and have high quality reference data. If reference and subsequent proficiency chemicals are chosen without sufficient evidence for their inclusion, both test method evaluation and demonstration of technical proficiency can be hampered. In this report we present cases in which the selection of reference chemicals led to problems in the reproduction of the reference results and demonstration of technical proficiency: The variability of results was not always taken into account in selection of several reference substances of the LLNA (OECD TG 429). Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex skin corrosion test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced. Likewise, the expected in vitro result for one of the proficiency chemicals for the BCOP (OECD TG 437) was difficult to reproduce in several labs. Furthermore, it was not possible to obtain one of the proficiency chemicals for the Steroidogenesis Assay (OECD TG 456) at non-prohibitive costs at a reasonable purity. Based on these, we recommend changes of current proficiency chemicals lists with established OECD Test Guidelines and provide recommendations for developing future sets of reference chemicals. •Reference chemicals and proficiency chemicals are needed for method development and technical proficiency assessment•Several reference chemicals of the LLNA (OECD TG 429) were selected though reference data was obtained from single studies•Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced•The result for one of the proficiency chemicals for the BCOP (OECD TG 437) was difficult to reproduce in several labs•It was not possible to obtain one of the proficiency chemicals for the Steroidogenesis Assay (OECD TG 456)</description><issn>0887-2333</issn><issn>1879-3177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMotlZ_gBfZo5ddJ8nuJsGTFK1CQRA9h2x2tk3Z7dZkW_Dfm9KqN-cyDPPmDe8j5JpCRoGWd6tscLuMAVUZsAxAnJAxlUKlnApxSsYgpUgZ53xELkJYAUAhGZyTEQfBZawxmb3hwvjarRfJsMTEY4Me1xZD0vT-b0zsEjtnTRuSvklMO6Bfm_gckw6HZV-HS3LWxC1eHfuEfDw9vk-f0_nr7GX6ME8tV-WQ0hJNnttKqFqovATOa6NYkVdoWWOMEhKU5EaYmmFRUSZyIUzOC5OzHBpAPiG3B9-N7z-3GAbduWCxbc0a-23QjEpOpeIFjVJ6kFrfhxCj6I13nfFfmoLe89MrHSPoPT8NTEd-8ebmaL-tOqx_L36ARcH9QYAx5M6h18G6PaHaebSDrnv3j_03wZyAZQ</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Kolle, S.N.</creator><creator>Hill, E.</creator><creator>Raabe, H.</creator><creator>Landsiedel, R.</creator><creator>Curren, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-1034</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods</title><author>Kolle, S.N. ; Hill, E. ; Raabe, H. ; Landsiedel, R. ; Curren, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16ea44cb79d7946033da9254bec2faa9780983a7ad2e5b127477a435a4240f0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolle, S.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raabe, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsiedel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curren, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Toxicology in vitro</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolle, S.N.</au><au>Hill, E.</au><au>Raabe, H.</au><au>Landsiedel, R.</au><au>Curren, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology in vitro</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol In Vitro</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><spage>48</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>48-53</pages><issn>0887-2333</issn><eissn>1879-3177</eissn><abstract>The selection of reference and proficiency chemicals is an important basis for method validation and proficiency evaluations. Reference chemicals are a set of test substances used by a method developer to evaluate the reliability and relevance of a new method, in comparison to reference data (usually to a validated reference method). Proficiency chemicals, as defined in OECD Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices, are defined post validation as a subset of the reference chemicals or other chemicals with sufficient supporting data that are used by naïve laboratories to demonstrate technical competence with a validated test method. Proficiency chemicals should cover different physical states, several chemical classes within the applicability domain of the method and yield the full range of responses (in the validated reference method and in vivo), they shall be commercially available (at non-prohibitive costs) and have high quality reference data. If reference and subsequent proficiency chemicals are chosen without sufficient evidence for their inclusion, both test method evaluation and demonstration of technical proficiency can be hampered. In this report we present cases in which the selection of reference chemicals led to problems in the reproduction of the reference results and demonstration of technical proficiency: The variability of results was not always taken into account in selection of several reference substances of the LLNA (OECD TG 429). Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex skin corrosion test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced. Likewise, the expected in vitro result for one of the proficiency chemicals for the BCOP (OECD TG 437) was difficult to reproduce in several labs. Furthermore, it was not possible to obtain one of the proficiency chemicals for the Steroidogenesis Assay (OECD TG 456) at non-prohibitive costs at a reasonable purity. Based on these, we recommend changes of current proficiency chemicals lists with established OECD Test Guidelines and provide recommendations for developing future sets of reference chemicals. •Reference chemicals and proficiency chemicals are needed for method development and technical proficiency assessment•Several reference chemicals of the LLNA (OECD TG 429) were selected though reference data was obtained from single studies•Based on the available reference data one proficiency chemical for the Corrositex test (OECD TG 435) should be replaced•The result for one of the proficiency chemicals for the BCOP (OECD TG 437) was difficult to reproduce in several labs•It was not possible to obtain one of the proficiency chemicals for the Steroidogenesis Assay (OECD TG 456)</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30738888</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tiv.2019.02.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-1034</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-2333
ispartof Toxicology in vitro, 2019-06, Vol.57, p.48-53
issn 0887-2333
1879-3177
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2183189351
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
title Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A58%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regarding%20the%20references%20for%20reference%20chemicals%20of%20alternative%20methods&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20in%20vitro&rft.au=Kolle,%20S.N.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=57&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=48-53&rft.issn=0887-2333&rft.eissn=1879-3177&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tiv.2019.02.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183189351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16ea44cb79d7946033da9254bec2faa9780983a7ad2e5b127477a435a4240f0e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183189351&rft_id=info:pmid/30738888&rfr_iscdi=true