Loading…

Zooplankton selectivity and nutritional value of phytoplankton influences a rich variety of dynamics in a plankton population model

Mathematical modeling may be an excellent tool to analyze and explain complex biological phenomena. In this paper, we use a mathematical model to reveal various interesting dynamical features of phytoplankton-zooplankton interaction and attempt to explain the reason for contrasting dynamics shown by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical review. E 2019-01, Vol.99 (1-1), p.012406-012406, Article 012406
Main Authors: Bairagi, Nandadulal, Saha, Suman, Chaudhuri, Sanjay, Dana, Syamal Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Mathematical modeling may be an excellent tool to analyze and explain complex biological phenomena. In this paper, we use a mathematical model to reveal various interesting dynamical features of phytoplankton-zooplankton interaction and attempt to explain the reason for contrasting dynamics shown by different laboratory and field experiments. Our study shows that the phytoplankton-zooplankton interaction in a pelagic system is very complex and the plankton dynamics, including the bloom phenomenon, strongly depends on the selective predation of zooplankton and the nutritional value of phytoplankton. The study supports the existing hypothesis that decoupling at the plant-animal interface may occur due to strong fish predation on zooplankton. In addition, we argue that decoupling of the food chain may also occur under low to intermediate nutrient inflow if zooplankton feeds on phytoplankton having lower nutritional value. It is also shown that nutrient enrichment can destabilize an otherwise stable system if zooplankton feeds on highly nutritious prey, but unable to destabilize the system if zooplankton feeds on low-nutritious prey. This may be one possible explanation to the longstanding question: Why do some experiments show the paradox of enrichment and others do not?
ISSN:2470-0045
2470-0053
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.99.012406