Comparative proteomic analysis of high‐ and low‐fertile buffalo bull spermatozoa for identification of fertility‐associated proteins

• Published in: Reproduction in domestic animals 2019-05, Vol.54 (5), p.786-794
• Main Authors: M. K, Muhammad Aslam, Kumaresan, Arumugam, Yadav, Savita, Mohanty, Tushar K., Datta, Tirtha K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 2D‐DIGE; Aldosterone synthase; Bioinformatics; buffalo bulls; Capacitation; Computer programs; Cryopreservation; Electrophoresis; Energy metabolism; Fertility; fertility‐associated proteins; Gel electrophoresis; Homology; Metabolism; Proteins; Proteomics; Spectrometry; Sperm; sperm proteomics; Spermatozoa
• ISSN: 0936-6768; 1439-0531
• DOI: 10.1111/rda.13426

Contents The present study identified few potential proteins in the spermatozoa of buffalo bulls that can be used as an aid in fertility determination through comparative proteomics. The sperm proteome of high‐fertile buffalo bulls was compared with that of low‐fertile buffalo bulls using two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D‐DIGE), and the differentially expressed proteins were identified through mass spectrometric method. The protein interaction network and the functional bioinformatics analysis of differentially expressed proteins were also carried out. In the spermatozoa of high‐fertile bulls, 10 proteins were found overexpressed and 15 proteins were underexpressed at the level of twofold or more (p ≤ 0.05). The proteins overexpressed in high‐fertile spermatozoa were PDZD8, GTF2F2, ZNF397, KIZ, LOH12CR1, ACRBP, PRSS37, CYP11B2, F13A1 and SPO11, whereas those overexpressed in low‐fertile spermatozoa were MT1A, ATP5F1, CS, TCRB, PRODH2, HARS, IDH3A, SRPK3, Uncharacterized protein C9orf9 homolog isoform X4, TUBB2B, GPR4, PMP2, CTSL1, TPPP2 and EGFL6. The differential expression ranged from 2.0‐ to 6.1‐fold between the two groups, where CYP11B2 was high abundant in high‐fertile spermatozoa and MT1A was highly abundant in low‐fertile spermatozoa. Most of the proteins overexpressed in low‐fertile spermatozoa were related to energy metabolism and capacitation factors, pointing out the possible role of pre‐mature capacitation and cryo‐damages in reducing the fertility of cryopreserved buffalo spermatozoa.