Blood Flow Alterations in the Anterior Maxillary Mucosa as Induced by Implant‐Retained Overdenture

• Published in: Journal of prosthodontics 2019-04, Vol.28 (4), p.373-378
• Main Authors: Alsrouji, Mohamed Samih, Ahmad, Rohana, Ibrahim, Norliza, Kuntjoro, Wahyu, Al‐Harbi, Fahad A., Baba, Nadim Z.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Blood flow; Bone blood flow; bone resorption; complete denture; Dental implants; Dentistry; Dentures; Doppler effect; Doppler‐laser flowmetry; implant‐retained overdenture; Ischemia; Mandible; Maxilla; Metabolites; Mucosa
• ISSN: 1059-941X; 1532-849X
• DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13047

Purpose Blood flow disturbance from functional pressure may lead to ischemia and accumulation of metabolites leading to residual ridge resorption (RRR) underneath complete dentures. The purposes of this study were to determine the effect of mandibular complete denture (CD) and implant‐retained overdenture (IRO) on blood flow disturbance in the opposing denture bearing‐mucosa of maxillary CD and to compare the blood flow disturbance to RRR of the anterior maxilla. Materials and Methods The test group included 9 participants rehabilitated by maxillary CD opposing mandibular IRO, while the control group consisted of 4 participants with CDs. Blood flow was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) after denture removal for 0, 30, 60, and 90 minutes. RRR was quantified as reduction in bone volume a year post‐treatment. The measurement of blood flow was then compared to the quantification of RRR. Results The mean blood flow measure for the IRO group was significantly lower than CD after immediate denture removal and 30 minutes later. After 60 minutes, the mean difference was not significant between groups, and at 90 minutes, the mean blood flow of both groups equalized to reach a steady state of 377 BPU. The mandibular IRO had reduced the initial blood flow measure in the opposing anterior maxilla mucosa to almost a quarter (103 BPU) of the steady state value (377 BPU) compared to the CD, which reduced it to only about one half (183 BPU), suggesting greater blood flow disturbance in the IRO group. This result is in tandem with the greater reduction of bone volume observed in the IRO group, which was 7.3 ± 1.3% after a year, almost three times higher than CD group at 2.6 ± 1.7%. Conclusion IRO may cause significantly higher blood flow disturbance than CD and may have contributed to greater RRR in the anterior maxilla.