Loading…
Impact of spot size variations on dose in scanned proton beam therapy
•Robustness of IMPT treatment plans to spot size variations depends on spot size.•Inter-spot spacing doesn’t influence robustness to spot size variations.•Tolerance limits on spot size variations in proton therapy are proposed.•Gamma analysis and DVH parameters may lead to different tolerance limits...
Saved in:
Published in: | Physica medica 2019-01, Vol.57, p.58-64 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Robustness of IMPT treatment plans to spot size variations depends on spot size.•Inter-spot spacing doesn’t influence robustness to spot size variations.•Tolerance limits on spot size variations in proton therapy are proposed.•Gamma analysis and DVH parameters may lead to different tolerance limits.
In scanned proton beam therapy systematic deviations in spot size at iso-center can occur as a result of changes in the beam-line optics. There is currently no general guideline of the spot size accuracy required clinically. In this work we quantify treatment plan robustness to systematic spot size variations as a function of spot size and spot spacing, and we suggest guidelines for tolerance levels for spot size variations.
Through perturbation of spot size in treatment plans for 7 patients and a phantom, we evaluated the dose impact of systematic spot size variations of 5% up to 50%. We investigated the dependence on nominal spot size by studying scenarios with small, medium and large spot sizes for various inter-spot spacings. To come to tolerance levels, we used the Γ passing rate and dose-volume-histograms.
Limits on spot size accuracy were extracted for 8 sites, 3 different spot sizes and 3 different inter-spot spacings. While the allowable spot size variation strongly depends on the spot size, the inter-spot spacing turned out to be only of limited influence.
Plan robustness to spot size variations strongly depend on spot size, with small spot plans being much more robust than larger spots plans. Inter-spot spacing did not influence plan robustness. Combining our results with existing literature, we propose limits of ±25%, ±20% and ±10% of the spot width σ, for spots with σ of 2.5, 5.0 and 10 mm in proton therapy spot scanning facilities, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1120-1797 1724-191X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.011 |