Loading…
Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice
Interleaved practice involves studying exemplars from different categories in a non-systematic, pseudorandom order under the constraint that no two exemplars from the same category are presented consecutively. Interleaved practice of materials has been shown to enhance test performance compared to b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Memory & cognition 2019-08, Vol.47 (6), p.1088-1101 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-40c8d43555a39acb165284cab4efb79663d4403d86c9994fdafe9c597991d0e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-40c8d43555a39acb165284cab4efb79663d4403d86c9994fdafe9c597991d0e63 |
container_end_page | 1101 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1088 |
container_title | Memory & cognition |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Foster, Nathaniel L. Mueller, Michael L. Was, Christopher Rawson, Katherine A. Dunlosky, John |
description | Interleaved practice involves studying exemplars from different categories in a non-systematic, pseudorandom order under the constraint that no two exemplars from the same category are presented consecutively. Interleaved practice of materials has been shown to enhance test performance compared to blocked practice in which exemplars from the same category are studied together. Why does interleaved practice produce this benefit? We evaluated two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses, the
discriminative-contrast hypothesis
and the
distributed-practice hypothesis
, by testing participants’ performance on calculating the volume of three-dimensional geometric shapes. In Experiment
1
, participants repeatedly practiced calculating the volume of four different-sized shapes according to blocked practice, interleaved practice, or remote-interleaved practice (which involved alternating the practice of volume calculation with non-volume problems, like permutations and fraction addition). Standard interleaving enhanced performance compared to blocked practice but did not produce enhanced performance compared to remote interleaving. In Experiment
2
, we replicated this pattern and extended the results to include a remote-blocked group, which involved blocking volume calculation with non-volume problems. Performance on key measures was better for remote-interleaved groups compared to remote-blocked groups, a finding that supports the distributed-practice hypothesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13421-019-00918-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193169290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2193169290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-40c8d43555a39acb165284cab4efb79663d4403d86c9994fdafe9c597991d0e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYMo9rX6BVxIwI2b0fyfZCVSbBUKblrqLmSSO30pbzLPJPOg396081Rw4Spwzu-e3MtB6A0lH3gv9cdCuWC0I9R0hBiqO_EMbajkrJNGqOdo01TSScJ-nKDTUu4JIVIa9RKdcKL7Xmi-Qfl2-4DDDAXHVCHvwB1iusNx2uf5AHhydYubmFNTP-HrLWA_p5rjsNQ4p4LnEYdYfI5TTK7Gw9F3pWKXwqO3whDwPjtfo4dX6MXodgVeH98zdHPx5fr8a3f1_fLb-eerzgstayeI10FwKaXjxvmBKsm08G4QMA69UYoHIQgPWnljjBiDG8F4aXpjaCCg-Bl6v-a2U34uUKqd2qaw27kE81Iso4ZTZZghDX33D3o_Lzm17SzjlAlFtTCNYivl81xKhtHu290uP1hK7GMjdm3EtkbsUyNWtKG3x-hlmCD8GfldQQP4CpRmpTvIf__-T-wv5VSYVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2312461849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Foster, Nathaniel L. ; Mueller, Michael L. ; Was, Christopher ; Rawson, Katherine A. ; Dunlosky, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Foster, Nathaniel L. ; Mueller, Michael L. ; Was, Christopher ; Rawson, Katherine A. ; Dunlosky, John</creatorcontrib><description>Interleaved practice involves studying exemplars from different categories in a non-systematic, pseudorandom order under the constraint that no two exemplars from the same category are presented consecutively. Interleaved practice of materials has been shown to enhance test performance compared to blocked practice in which exemplars from the same category are studied together. Why does interleaved practice produce this benefit? We evaluated two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses, the
discriminative-contrast hypothesis
and the
distributed-practice hypothesis
, by testing participants’ performance on calculating the volume of three-dimensional geometric shapes. In Experiment
1
, participants repeatedly practiced calculating the volume of four different-sized shapes according to blocked practice, interleaved practice, or remote-interleaved practice (which involved alternating the practice of volume calculation with non-volume problems, like permutations and fraction addition). Standard interleaving enhanced performance compared to blocked practice but did not produce enhanced performance compared to remote interleaving. In Experiment
2
, we replicated this pattern and extended the results to include a remote-blocked group, which involved blocking volume calculation with non-volume problems. Performance on key measures was better for remote-interleaved groups compared to remote-blocked groups, a finding that supports the distributed-practice hypothesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00918-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30877483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Artists ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Birds ; Cartoons ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Experiments ; Hypotheses ; Painters ; Psychology ; Schedules</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2019-08, Vol.47 (6), p.1088-1101</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-40c8d43555a39acb165284cab4efb79663d4403d86c9994fdafe9c597991d0e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-40c8d43555a39acb165284cab4efb79663d4403d86c9994fdafe9c597991d0e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2312461849/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2312461849?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,21374,27903,27904,33590,33591,36039,36040,43712,44342,73967,74641</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30877483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foster, Nathaniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Was, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawson, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlosky, John</creatorcontrib><title>Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>Interleaved practice involves studying exemplars from different categories in a non-systematic, pseudorandom order under the constraint that no two exemplars from the same category are presented consecutively. Interleaved practice of materials has been shown to enhance test performance compared to blocked practice in which exemplars from the same category are studied together. Why does interleaved practice produce this benefit? We evaluated two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses, the
discriminative-contrast hypothesis
and the
distributed-practice hypothesis
, by testing participants’ performance on calculating the volume of three-dimensional geometric shapes. In Experiment
1
, participants repeatedly practiced calculating the volume of four different-sized shapes according to blocked practice, interleaved practice, or remote-interleaved practice (which involved alternating the practice of volume calculation with non-volume problems, like permutations and fraction addition). Standard interleaving enhanced performance compared to blocked practice but did not produce enhanced performance compared to remote interleaving. In Experiment
2
, we replicated this pattern and extended the results to include a remote-blocked group, which involved blocking volume calculation with non-volume problems. Performance on key measures was better for remote-interleaved groups compared to remote-blocked groups, a finding that supports the distributed-practice hypothesis.</description><subject>Artists</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cartoons</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Painters</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYMo9rX6BVxIwI2b0fyfZCVSbBUKblrqLmSSO30pbzLPJPOg396081Rw4Spwzu-e3MtB6A0lH3gv9cdCuWC0I9R0hBiqO_EMbajkrJNGqOdo01TSScJ-nKDTUu4JIVIa9RKdcKL7Xmi-Qfl2-4DDDAXHVCHvwB1iusNx2uf5AHhydYubmFNTP-HrLWA_p5rjsNQ4p4LnEYdYfI5TTK7Gw9F3pWKXwqO3whDwPjtfo4dX6MXodgVeH98zdHPx5fr8a3f1_fLb-eerzgstayeI10FwKaXjxvmBKsm08G4QMA69UYoHIQgPWnljjBiDG8F4aXpjaCCg-Bl6v-a2U34uUKqd2qaw27kE81Iso4ZTZZghDX33D3o_Lzm17SzjlAlFtTCNYivl81xKhtHu290uP1hK7GMjdm3EtkbsUyNWtKG3x-hlmCD8GfldQQP4CpRmpTvIf__-T-wv5VSYVQ</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Foster, Nathaniel L.</creator><creator>Mueller, Michael L.</creator><creator>Was, Christopher</creator><creator>Rawson, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Dunlosky, John</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice</title><author>Foster, Nathaniel L. ; Mueller, Michael L. ; Was, Christopher ; Rawson, Katherine A. ; Dunlosky, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-40c8d43555a39acb165284cab4efb79663d4403d86c9994fdafe9c597991d0e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Artists</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cartoons</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Painters</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foster, Nathaniel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Was, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawson, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlosky, John</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foster, Nathaniel L.</au><au>Mueller, Michael L.</au><au>Was, Christopher</au><au>Rawson, Katherine A.</au><au>Dunlosky, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><stitle>Mem Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1088</spage><epage>1101</epage><pages>1088-1101</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><abstract>Interleaved practice involves studying exemplars from different categories in a non-systematic, pseudorandom order under the constraint that no two exemplars from the same category are presented consecutively. Interleaved practice of materials has been shown to enhance test performance compared to blocked practice in which exemplars from the same category are studied together. Why does interleaved practice produce this benefit? We evaluated two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses, the
discriminative-contrast hypothesis
and the
distributed-practice hypothesis
, by testing participants’ performance on calculating the volume of three-dimensional geometric shapes. In Experiment
1
, participants repeatedly practiced calculating the volume of four different-sized shapes according to blocked practice, interleaved practice, or remote-interleaved practice (which involved alternating the practice of volume calculation with non-volume problems, like permutations and fraction addition). Standard interleaving enhanced performance compared to blocked practice but did not produce enhanced performance compared to remote interleaving. In Experiment
2
, we replicated this pattern and extended the results to include a remote-blocked group, which involved blocking volume calculation with non-volume problems. Performance on key measures was better for remote-interleaved groups compared to remote-blocked groups, a finding that supports the distributed-practice hypothesis.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30877483</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13421-019-00918-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2019-08, Vol.47 (6), p.1088-1101 |
issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193169290 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM global; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature |
subjects | Artists Behavioral Science and Psychology Birds Cartoons Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Psychology Experiments Hypotheses Painters Psychology Schedules |
title | Why does interleaving improve math learning? The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20does%20interleaving%20improve%20math%20learning?%20The%20contributions%20of%20discriminative%20contrast%20and%20distributed%20practice&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Foster,%20Nathaniel%20L.&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1088&rft.epage=1101&rft.pages=1088-1101&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13421-019-00918-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193169290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-40c8d43555a39acb165284cab4efb79663d4403d86c9994fdafe9c597991d0e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2312461849&rft_id=info:pmid/30877483&rfr_iscdi=true |