Loading…

Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level

To assess whether electrical stimulation sequentially delivered through 4 electrodes located in different cochlear areas may elicit the stapedial reflex at lower levels compared to single electrode stimulation and to correlate the sequentially obtained values with the maximum comfort level (C-level)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases head and neck diseases, 2019-06, Vol.136 (3), p.169-172
Main Authors: Guida, M., Falcioni, M., Di Lella, F., Negri, M., Fagnani, E., Vincenti, V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b9b2631bef9a486aea9e8d20bc2843e46bc0a4ed0a2b4b3542fcfcc5bd20f8653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b9b2631bef9a486aea9e8d20bc2843e46bc0a4ed0a2b4b3542fcfcc5bd20f8653
container_end_page 172
container_issue 3
container_start_page 169
container_title European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases
container_volume 136
creator Guida, M.
Falcioni, M.
Di Lella, F.
Negri, M.
Fagnani, E.
Vincenti, V.
description To assess whether electrical stimulation sequentially delivered through 4 electrodes located in different cochlear areas may elicit the stapedial reflex at lower levels compared to single electrode stimulation and to correlate the sequentially obtained values with the maximum comfort level (C-level). A retrospective study was performed on 35 post-verbal adult patients (age 19–80 years) consecutively implanted in 2 cochlear implant centers, evaluating the level of stimulation (pulse width) necessary to electrically evoke the stapedial reflex with two different stimulation modalities: single electrode versus sequential 4 electrode stimulation. Threshold values were compared with C-level obtained at activation. The average differences of pulse width and C-level were significantly smaller (P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.01.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193607484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1879729619300237</els_id><sourcerecordid>2193607484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b9b2631bef9a486aea9e8d20bc2843e46bc0a4ed0a2b4b3542fcfcc5bd20f8653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctqGzEUFaWlCW6-oBC07GYcvTyWCl0UkxckdNNCd0LS3IllNCNX0jjJ7_RLK8dO6ariggT3nHN1z0HoIyVzSmh7sZmbMaYwZ4TKOaG12Bt0SuVSNUtOfr59fTPVnqCznDekHi6lIuo9OuFELuWCqFP0-34KxTcQwJUUO8AZfk0wFm8C3kHKU8bZjw8B8D-Q4ocpmOLjiEusDe98wWW975gtdHtugj7AE-6mVNnYRbcOYBL2wzaYsbxwP-NVTAmOQo--rPFgnqr0UPFDH1PBAXYQPqB3vQkZzo73DP24uvy-umnuvl3frr7eNU4QURqrLGs5tdArI2RrwCiQHSPWMSk4iNY6YgR0xDArLF8I1rveuYWtmF62Cz5Dnw662xSrB7nowWcHoX4Y4pQ1o4q3ZCmq2gzxA9SlmHPdVW-TH0x61pTofT56o1_y0ft8NKG1WGWdHwdMdoDuL-c1jQr4cgBAXXPnIensPIyuWpqq-bqL_r8D_gBQ0aiK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193607484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Guida, M. ; Falcioni, M. ; Di Lella, F. ; Negri, M. ; Fagnani, E. ; Vincenti, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guida, M. ; Falcioni, M. ; Di Lella, F. ; Negri, M. ; Fagnani, E. ; Vincenti, V.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess whether electrical stimulation sequentially delivered through 4 electrodes located in different cochlear areas may elicit the stapedial reflex at lower levels compared to single electrode stimulation and to correlate the sequentially obtained values with the maximum comfort level (C-level). A retrospective study was performed on 35 post-verbal adult patients (age 19–80 years) consecutively implanted in 2 cochlear implant centers, evaluating the level of stimulation (pulse width) necessary to electrically evoke the stapedial reflex with two different stimulation modalities: single electrode versus sequential 4 electrode stimulation. Threshold values were compared with C-level obtained at activation. The average differences of pulse width and C-level were significantly smaller (P&lt;0.0001) when the stapedial reflex was obtained with the sequential stimulation modality and reached statistical significance for every single electrode (P&lt;0.0001). Stapedial reflex thresholds obtained with sequential stimulation through 4 different electrodes significantly correlate to the C-level obtained at the first setting and may be helpful in defining the upper limit of the dynamic field during initial CI mapping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1879-7296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-730X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.01.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30878509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Cochlear Implantation ; Comfort level ; Electric Stimulation - instrumentation ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrophysiology ; Female ; Humans ; Implantable Neurostimulators ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reflex, Acoustic - physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Stapedius - physiology ; Stapedius reflex ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases, 2019-06, Vol.136 (3), p.169-172</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b9b2631bef9a486aea9e8d20bc2843e46bc0a4ed0a2b4b3542fcfcc5bd20f8653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b9b2631bef9a486aea9e8d20bc2843e46bc0a4ed0a2b4b3542fcfcc5bd20f8653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30878509$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guida, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcioni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lella, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negri, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagnani, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenti, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level</title><title>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases</title><addtitle>Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis</addtitle><description>To assess whether electrical stimulation sequentially delivered through 4 electrodes located in different cochlear areas may elicit the stapedial reflex at lower levels compared to single electrode stimulation and to correlate the sequentially obtained values with the maximum comfort level (C-level). A retrospective study was performed on 35 post-verbal adult patients (age 19–80 years) consecutively implanted in 2 cochlear implant centers, evaluating the level of stimulation (pulse width) necessary to electrically evoke the stapedial reflex with two different stimulation modalities: single electrode versus sequential 4 electrode stimulation. Threshold values were compared with C-level obtained at activation. The average differences of pulse width and C-level were significantly smaller (P&lt;0.0001) when the stapedial reflex was obtained with the sequential stimulation modality and reached statistical significance for every single electrode (P&lt;0.0001). Stapedial reflex thresholds obtained with sequential stimulation through 4 different electrodes significantly correlate to the C-level obtained at the first setting and may be helpful in defining the upper limit of the dynamic field during initial CI mapping.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Comfort level</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantable Neurostimulators</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reflex, Acoustic - physiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stapedius - physiology</subject><subject>Stapedius reflex</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1879-7296</issn><issn>1879-730X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UctqGzEUFaWlCW6-oBC07GYcvTyWCl0UkxckdNNCd0LS3IllNCNX0jjJ7_RLK8dO6ariggT3nHN1z0HoIyVzSmh7sZmbMaYwZ4TKOaG12Bt0SuVSNUtOfr59fTPVnqCznDekHi6lIuo9OuFELuWCqFP0-34KxTcQwJUUO8AZfk0wFm8C3kHKU8bZjw8B8D-Q4ocpmOLjiEusDe98wWW975gtdHtugj7AE-6mVNnYRbcOYBL2wzaYsbxwP-NVTAmOQo--rPFgnqr0UPFDH1PBAXYQPqB3vQkZzo73DP24uvy-umnuvl3frr7eNU4QURqrLGs5tdArI2RrwCiQHSPWMSk4iNY6YgR0xDArLF8I1rveuYWtmF62Cz5Dnw662xSrB7nowWcHoX4Y4pQ1o4q3ZCmq2gzxA9SlmHPdVW-TH0x61pTofT56o1_y0ft8NKG1WGWdHwdMdoDuL-c1jQr4cgBAXXPnIensPIyuWpqq-bqL_r8D_gBQ0aiK</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Guida, M.</creator><creator>Falcioni, M.</creator><creator>Di Lella, F.</creator><creator>Negri, M.</creator><creator>Fagnani, E.</creator><creator>Vincenti, V.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level</title><author>Guida, M. ; Falcioni, M. ; Di Lella, F. ; Negri, M. ; Fagnani, E. ; Vincenti, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b9b2631bef9a486aea9e8d20bc2843e46bc0a4ed0a2b4b3542fcfcc5bd20f8653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Comfort level</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantable Neurostimulators</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reflex, Acoustic - physiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stapedius - physiology</topic><topic>Stapedius reflex</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guida, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcioni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lella, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negri, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagnani, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenti, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guida, M.</au><au>Falcioni, M.</au><au>Di Lella, F.</au><au>Negri, M.</au><au>Fagnani, E.</au><au>Vincenti, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level</atitle><jtitle>European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>169-172</pages><issn>1879-7296</issn><eissn>1879-730X</eissn><abstract>To assess whether electrical stimulation sequentially delivered through 4 electrodes located in different cochlear areas may elicit the stapedial reflex at lower levels compared to single electrode stimulation and to correlate the sequentially obtained values with the maximum comfort level (C-level). A retrospective study was performed on 35 post-verbal adult patients (age 19–80 years) consecutively implanted in 2 cochlear implant centers, evaluating the level of stimulation (pulse width) necessary to electrically evoke the stapedial reflex with two different stimulation modalities: single electrode versus sequential 4 electrode stimulation. Threshold values were compared with C-level obtained at activation. The average differences of pulse width and C-level were significantly smaller (P&lt;0.0001) when the stapedial reflex was obtained with the sequential stimulation modality and reached statistical significance for every single electrode (P&lt;0.0001). Stapedial reflex thresholds obtained with sequential stimulation through 4 different electrodes significantly correlate to the C-level obtained at the first setting and may be helpful in defining the upper limit of the dynamic field during initial CI mapping.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>30878509</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anorl.2018.01.012</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1879-7296
ispartof European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases, 2019-06, Vol.136 (3), p.169-172
issn 1879-7296
1879-730X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2193607484
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Auditory Threshold - physiology
Cochlear Implantation
Comfort level
Electric Stimulation - instrumentation
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electrophysiology
Female
Humans
Implantable Neurostimulators
Male
Middle Aged
Reflex, Acoustic - physiology
Retrospective Studies
Stapedius - physiology
Stapedius reflex
Young Adult
title Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A01%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-electrode%20sequential%20versus%20single%20electrode%20stimulation%20to%20elicit%20the%20stapedial%20reflex%20during%20cochlear%20implantation:%20Correlation%20with%20maximum%20comfort%20level&rft.jtitle=European%20annals%20of%20otorhinolaryngology,%20head%20and%20neck%20diseases&rft.au=Guida,%20M.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=169-172&rft.issn=1879-7296&rft.eissn=1879-730X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anorl.2018.01.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193607484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-b9b2631bef9a486aea9e8d20bc2843e46bc0a4ed0a2b4b3542fcfcc5bd20f8653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193607484&rft_id=info:pmid/30878509&rfr_iscdi=true