Loading…
The Resident Report Card: A Tool for Operative Feedback and Evaluation of Technical Skills
Competency-based medical education surgical curriculums will require frequent, recorded trainee performance evaluations. It is our hypothesis that written feedback after each operation can be used to chart surgical progress, can identify underperforming trainees, and will prove beneficial for reside...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The Journal of surgical research 2019-07, Vol.239, p.261-268 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-3633198c478300faff158856fc981ff2162ce959b86830111d6d7e055d5784413 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-3633198c478300faff158856fc981ff2162ce959b86830111d6d7e055d5784413 |
| container_end_page | 268 |
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 261 |
| container_title | The Journal of surgical research |
| container_volume | 239 |
| creator | Harriman, David Singla, Rohit Nguan, Christopher |
| description | Competency-based medical education surgical curriculums will require frequent, recorded trainee performance evaluations. It is our hypothesis that written feedback after each operation can be used to chart surgical progress, can identify underperforming trainees, and will prove beneficial for resident learning.
The resident report card (RRC) is an online, easy-to-use evaluation tool designed to facilitate the creation and distribution of resident technical assessments. RRC data were collected from urologic trainees and analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc testing to confirm our hypothesis. A standardized survey was sent to residents, gauging their views on the RRC.
Over a 5-y period, 958 RRCs with the resident listed as the primary operator were collected across 29 different procedures. Resident cohort and individual performance scores stratified by postgraduate year (PGY) were shown to significantly improve when all procedures (cohort, 6.5 ± 1.9 [PGY-1] to 9.1 ± 1.0 [PGY-5]; individual [resident M], 8.8 ± 1.8 [PGY-3] to 9.4 ± 0.7 [PGY-5], P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.006 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194135264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480419300836</els_id><sourcerecordid>2194135264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-3633198c478300faff158856fc981ff2162ce959b86830111d6d7e055d5784413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVoSZyPH5BL0bGX3Y6klVbbnoJJ0kIg0LqXXIQsjYic9cqV1ob--yo47bGn-eCZF-Yh5JpBy4CpT5t2U0rLgQ0t8BZAnZAFg0E2WvXiHVkAcN50Grozcl7KBuo89OKUnAnQuhOaL8jT6hnpdyzR4zTXZpfyTJc2-8_0hq5SGmlImT7uMNs5HpDeIfq1dS_UTp7eHuy4r_s00RToCt3zFJ0d6Y-XOI7lkrwPdix49VYvyM-729Xya_PweP9tefPQOCHF3AglBBu063otAIINgUmtpQpu0CwEzhR3OMhhrVUFGGNe-R5BSi973XVMXJCPx9xdTr_2WGazjcXhONoJ074YzoZKSa66irIj6nIqJWMwuxy3Nv82DMyrUrMxVal5VWqAm6q03nx4i9-vt-j_Xfx1WIEvRwDrk4eI2RQXcXLoY0Y3G5_if-L_AKEnhG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2194135264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Resident Report Card: A Tool for Operative Feedback and Evaluation of Technical Skills</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Harriman, David ; Singla, Rohit ; Nguan, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Harriman, David ; Singla, Rohit ; Nguan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Competency-based medical education surgical curriculums will require frequent, recorded trainee performance evaluations. It is our hypothesis that written feedback after each operation can be used to chart surgical progress, can identify underperforming trainees, and will prove beneficial for resident learning.
The resident report card (RRC) is an online, easy-to-use evaluation tool designed to facilitate the creation and distribution of resident technical assessments. RRC data were collected from urologic trainees and analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc testing to confirm our hypothesis. A standardized survey was sent to residents, gauging their views on the RRC.
Over a 5-y period, 958 RRCs with the resident listed as the primary operator were collected across 29 different procedures. Resident cohort and individual performance scores stratified by postgraduate year (PGY) were shown to significantly improve when all procedures (cohort, 6.5 ± 1.9 [PGY-1] to 9.1 ± 1.0 [PGY-5]; individual [resident M], 8.8 ± 1.8 [PGY-3] to 9.4 ± 0.7 [PGY-5], P < 0.01) and specific procedures (laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: cohort, 7.3 ± 1.3 [PGY-3] to 8.9 ± 1.0 [PGY-5]; individual [resident I], 7.2 ± 1.3 [PGY-3] to 9.5 ± 0.6 [PGY-5], P < 0.01) were analyzed. Individual residents were able to be compared to their own peer group and to the average scores across all evaluated residents. Surveyed residents were overwhelmingly positive about the RRC.
The RRC adds further evidence to the fact that standardized, formative, and timely assessment can capture trainee performance over time and against comparator cohorts in an acceptable format to residents and academic training programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30884382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Cohort Studies ; Competency-Based Education - organization & administration ; Competency-Based Education - standards ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Feedback ; Female ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Internet ; Internship and Residency - organization & administration ; Internship and Residency - standards ; Male ; Operative skills ; Resident training ; Surgery ; Surgical education ; Technical assessment ; Urology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2019-07, Vol.239, p.261-268</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-3633198c478300faff158856fc981ff2162ce959b86830111d6d7e055d5784413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-3633198c478300faff158856fc981ff2162ce959b86830111d6d7e055d5784413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8876-654X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30884382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harriman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singla, Rohit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>The Resident Report Card: A Tool for Operative Feedback and Evaluation of Technical Skills</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Competency-based medical education surgical curriculums will require frequent, recorded trainee performance evaluations. It is our hypothesis that written feedback after each operation can be used to chart surgical progress, can identify underperforming trainees, and will prove beneficial for resident learning.
The resident report card (RRC) is an online, easy-to-use evaluation tool designed to facilitate the creation and distribution of resident technical assessments. RRC data were collected from urologic trainees and analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc testing to confirm our hypothesis. A standardized survey was sent to residents, gauging their views on the RRC.
Over a 5-y period, 958 RRCs with the resident listed as the primary operator were collected across 29 different procedures. Resident cohort and individual performance scores stratified by postgraduate year (PGY) were shown to significantly improve when all procedures (cohort, 6.5 ± 1.9 [PGY-1] to 9.1 ± 1.0 [PGY-5]; individual [resident M], 8.8 ± 1.8 [PGY-3] to 9.4 ± 0.7 [PGY-5], P < 0.01) and specific procedures (laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: cohort, 7.3 ± 1.3 [PGY-3] to 8.9 ± 1.0 [PGY-5]; individual [resident I], 7.2 ± 1.3 [PGY-3] to 9.5 ± 0.6 [PGY-5], P < 0.01) were analyzed. Individual residents were able to be compared to their own peer group and to the average scores across all evaluated residents. Surveyed residents were overwhelmingly positive about the RRC.
The RRC adds further evidence to the fact that standardized, formative, and timely assessment can capture trainee performance over time and against comparator cohorts in an acceptable format to residents and academic training programs.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Competency-Based Education - organization & administration</subject><subject>Competency-Based Education - standards</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Operative skills</subject><subject>Resident training</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical education</subject><subject>Technical assessment</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVoSZyPH5BL0bGX3Y6klVbbnoJJ0kIg0LqXXIQsjYic9cqV1ob--yo47bGn-eCZF-Yh5JpBy4CpT5t2U0rLgQ0t8BZAnZAFg0E2WvXiHVkAcN50Grozcl7KBuo89OKUnAnQuhOaL8jT6hnpdyzR4zTXZpfyTJc2-8_0hq5SGmlImT7uMNs5HpDeIfq1dS_UTp7eHuy4r_s00RToCt3zFJ0d6Y-XOI7lkrwPdix49VYvyM-729Xya_PweP9tefPQOCHF3AglBBu063otAIINgUmtpQpu0CwEzhR3OMhhrVUFGGNe-R5BSi973XVMXJCPx9xdTr_2WGazjcXhONoJ074YzoZKSa66irIj6nIqJWMwuxy3Nv82DMyrUrMxVal5VWqAm6q03nx4i9-vt-j_Xfx1WIEvRwDrk4eI2RQXcXLoY0Y3G5_if-L_AKEnhG0</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Harriman, David</creator><creator>Singla, Rohit</creator><creator>Nguan, Christopher</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-654X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>The Resident Report Card: A Tool for Operative Feedback and Evaluation of Technical Skills</title><author>Harriman, David ; Singla, Rohit ; Nguan, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-3633198c478300faff158856fc981ff2162ce959b86830111d6d7e055d5784413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Competency-Based Education - organization & administration</topic><topic>Competency-Based Education - standards</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Operative skills</topic><topic>Resident training</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical education</topic><topic>Technical assessment</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harriman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singla, Rohit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguan, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harriman, David</au><au>Singla, Rohit</au><au>Nguan, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Resident Report Card: A Tool for Operative Feedback and Evaluation of Technical Skills</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>239</volume><spage>261</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>261-268</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Competency-based medical education surgical curriculums will require frequent, recorded trainee performance evaluations. It is our hypothesis that written feedback after each operation can be used to chart surgical progress, can identify underperforming trainees, and will prove beneficial for resident learning.
The resident report card (RRC) is an online, easy-to-use evaluation tool designed to facilitate the creation and distribution of resident technical assessments. RRC data were collected from urologic trainees and analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc testing to confirm our hypothesis. A standardized survey was sent to residents, gauging their views on the RRC.
Over a 5-y period, 958 RRCs with the resident listed as the primary operator were collected across 29 different procedures. Resident cohort and individual performance scores stratified by postgraduate year (PGY) were shown to significantly improve when all procedures (cohort, 6.5 ± 1.9 [PGY-1] to 9.1 ± 1.0 [PGY-5]; individual [resident M], 8.8 ± 1.8 [PGY-3] to 9.4 ± 0.7 [PGY-5], P < 0.01) and specific procedures (laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: cohort, 7.3 ± 1.3 [PGY-3] to 8.9 ± 1.0 [PGY-5]; individual [resident I], 7.2 ± 1.3 [PGY-3] to 9.5 ± 0.6 [PGY-5], P < 0.01) were analyzed. Individual residents were able to be compared to their own peer group and to the average scores across all evaluated residents. Surveyed residents were overwhelmingly positive about the RRC.
The RRC adds further evidence to the fact that standardized, formative, and timely assessment can capture trainee performance over time and against comparator cohorts in an acceptable format to residents and academic training programs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30884382</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-654X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4804 |
| ispartof | The Journal of surgical research, 2019-07, Vol.239, p.261-268 |
| issn | 0022-4804 1095-8673 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194135264 |
| source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
| subjects | Clinical Competence Cohort Studies Competency-Based Education - organization & administration Competency-Based Education - standards Educational Measurement - methods Educational Measurement - standards Feedback Female General Surgery - education Humans Internet Internship and Residency - organization & administration Internship and Residency - standards Male Operative skills Resident training Surgery Surgical education Technical assessment Urology |
| title | The Resident Report Card: A Tool for Operative Feedback and Evaluation of Technical Skills |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A37%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Resident%20Report%20Card:%20A%20Tool%20for%20Operative%20Feedback%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Technical%20Skills&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Harriman,%20David&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=239&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=261-268&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2194135264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-3633198c478300faff158856fc981ff2162ce959b86830111d6d7e055d5784413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2194135264&rft_id=info:pmid/30884382&rfr_iscdi=true |