Loading…
Coeliac disease in Caucasian and South Asian patients in the North West of England
Background Coeliac disease is an autoimmune enteropathy characterised by mucosal inflammation subsequent to gluten exposure, leading to malabsorption. Treatment is strict dietary control, relying on the patient's ability to maintain lifestyle modifications. The present study aimed to compare cl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics 2019-08, Vol.32 (4), p.525-530 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Coeliac disease is an autoimmune enteropathy characterised by mucosal inflammation subsequent to gluten exposure, leading to malabsorption. Treatment is strict dietary control, relying on the patient's ability to maintain lifestyle modifications. The present study aimed to compare clinical presentation and adherence to a gluten‐free diet between South Asian and Caucasian patients with coeliac disease in East Lancashire
Methods
In total, 33 South Asian and 113 Caucasian adult patients diagnosed with coeliac disease under the care of the Dietetics Department at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust were selected using a convenience sampling method and then allocated to the South Asian or Caucasian group. A subjective assessment of dietetic notes from follow‐up visits within 1 year of the first appointment was undertaken by two investigators who subsequently allocated the patients to one of the three categories: (i) fully‐adherent; (ii) partly‐adherent; and (iii) non‐adherent. Presenting complaint, vitamin D, vitamin B12, folate and ferritin levels were also compared.
Results
There was a significant difference in adherence to gluten‐free diet between the groups, with a larger proportion of Caucasian patients being fully adherent to gluten‐free diet compared to South Asian patients (64.6% versus 12.1%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0952-3871 1365-277X |
DOI: | 10.1111/jhn.12622 |