Loading…

Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term?

Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 guidelines recommend group B streptococcus (GBS) screening at 35-37-week gestation to identify women with positive cultures who should receive intrapartum antibiotics and notes that the predictive value of a negative culture declines aft...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine 2020-11, Vol.33 (22), p.3791-3797
Main Authors: Mirsky, Rachel, Carpenter, Diane M., Postlethwaite, Debbie A., Regenstein, Anne C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5355a0ea7464d7649d813fa9d727ccdc10910deaf91ab293702e81a8d99fcd213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5355a0ea7464d7649d813fa9d727ccdc10910deaf91ab293702e81a8d99fcd213
container_end_page 3797
container_issue 22
container_start_page 3791
container_title The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine
container_volume 33
creator Mirsky, Rachel
Carpenter, Diane M.
Postlethwaite, Debbie A.
Regenstein, Anne C.
description Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 guidelines recommend group B streptococcus (GBS) screening at 35-37-week gestation to identify women with positive cultures who should receive intrapartum antibiotics and notes that the predictive value of a negative culture declines after 5 weeks. However, despite the lack of evidence, current guidelines do not recommend rescreening for those screened between 35 and 37 weeks. Our objectives were to investigate the rate of conversion from negative to positive results in women rescreened after appropriate screening at 35-37-week gestation and to examine the impact of rescreening on the use of intrapartum antibiotics. Additionally, we examined cases of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis (early-onset GBS) in term neonates. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women delivering liveborn infants 1 January, 2010-31 December, 2014 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Data were obtained from database extraction and chart review. Results: We identified 135,585 women with GBS screening at 35-37-week gestation; 4511 (3.3%) women were rescreened. Of the 3860 (85.6%) initially screened negative, 218 (5.6%) converted to positive. Fewer women in the discordant negative to positive group received GBS prophylaxis prior to delivery compared with women with a single positive culture (65.9 versus 92.3%, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14767058.2019.1586874
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194591782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2194591782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5355a0ea7464d7649d813fa9d727ccdc10910deaf91ab293702e81a8d99fcd213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi1UBMuWn0DlYy9Z7MSO7V5aiviSkOBAz5axJzRVEqdjh2r_PYl26ZHTfOiZd6SHkDPONpxpds6FqhWTelMybjZc6lorcUBWy74QRopP-36BjslJSn8YK7lg8ogcV0wbNo8rYh8RXmHI7fBCwWG3LeKQINMXjNNIf9KUEcYcffTedTTBmNr0jbaJ5t-AQB3F2AFtIlKE5BFgWJKGOYpmwP77Z3LYuC7B6b6uya_rq6fL2-L-4ebu8uK-8FVd50JWUjoGTolaBFULEzSvGmeCKpX3wXNmOAvgGsPdc2kqxUrQ3OlgTONDyas1-brLHTH-nSBl27fJQ9e5AeKUbMmNkIYrXc6o3KEeY0oIjR2x7R1uLWd2cWvf3drFrd27ne--7F9Mzz2E_1fvMmfgxw5oh1lI7_5F7ILNbttFbNANvk22-vjHG0goiQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2194591782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term?</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Mirsky, Rachel ; Carpenter, Diane M. ; Postlethwaite, Debbie A. ; Regenstein, Anne C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mirsky, Rachel ; Carpenter, Diane M. ; Postlethwaite, Debbie A. ; Regenstein, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 guidelines recommend group B streptococcus (GBS) screening at 35-37-week gestation to identify women with positive cultures who should receive intrapartum antibiotics and notes that the predictive value of a negative culture declines after 5 weeks. However, despite the lack of evidence, current guidelines do not recommend rescreening for those screened between 35 and 37 weeks. Our objectives were to investigate the rate of conversion from negative to positive results in women rescreened after appropriate screening at 35-37-week gestation and to examine the impact of rescreening on the use of intrapartum antibiotics. Additionally, we examined cases of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis (early-onset GBS) in term neonates. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women delivering liveborn infants 1 January, 2010-31 December, 2014 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Data were obtained from database extraction and chart review. Results: We identified 135,585 women with GBS screening at 35-37-week gestation; 4511 (3.3%) women were rescreened. Of the 3860 (85.6%) initially screened negative, 218 (5.6%) converted to positive. Fewer women in the discordant negative to positive group received GBS prophylaxis prior to delivery compared with women with a single positive culture (65.9 versus 92.3%, p &lt; .001). In the discordant negative to positive group, results were available at the time of delivery in 133 of 217 subjects (61.3%). There were 18 cases of early-onset GBS at term (0.10 per 1000 livebirths); the majority of cases occurred among women with negative screening. Conclusion: Our results provide support for the current CDC recommendation against rescreening near term for those women already screened at 35-37-week gestation given the low rate of conversion from negative to positive, and the extremely low rate of early-onset GBS in the screened population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-7058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1586874</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30890002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Early-onset neonatal sepsis ; GBS ; GBS rescreening ; group B streptococcus ; neonatal early-onset GBS</subject><ispartof>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine, 2020-11, Vol.33 (22), p.3791-3797</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5355a0ea7464d7649d813fa9d727ccdc10910deaf91ab293702e81a8d99fcd213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5355a0ea7464d7649d813fa9d727ccdc10910deaf91ab293702e81a8d99fcd213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mirsky, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Diane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postlethwaite, Debbie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regenstein, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><title>Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term?</title><title>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</title><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><description>Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 guidelines recommend group B streptococcus (GBS) screening at 35-37-week gestation to identify women with positive cultures who should receive intrapartum antibiotics and notes that the predictive value of a negative culture declines after 5 weeks. However, despite the lack of evidence, current guidelines do not recommend rescreening for those screened between 35 and 37 weeks. Our objectives were to investigate the rate of conversion from negative to positive results in women rescreened after appropriate screening at 35-37-week gestation and to examine the impact of rescreening on the use of intrapartum antibiotics. Additionally, we examined cases of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis (early-onset GBS) in term neonates. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women delivering liveborn infants 1 January, 2010-31 December, 2014 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Data were obtained from database extraction and chart review. Results: We identified 135,585 women with GBS screening at 35-37-week gestation; 4511 (3.3%) women were rescreened. Of the 3860 (85.6%) initially screened negative, 218 (5.6%) converted to positive. Fewer women in the discordant negative to positive group received GBS prophylaxis prior to delivery compared with women with a single positive culture (65.9 versus 92.3%, p &lt; .001). In the discordant negative to positive group, results were available at the time of delivery in 133 of 217 subjects (61.3%). There were 18 cases of early-onset GBS at term (0.10 per 1000 livebirths); the majority of cases occurred among women with negative screening. Conclusion: Our results provide support for the current CDC recommendation against rescreening near term for those women already screened at 35-37-week gestation given the low rate of conversion from negative to positive, and the extremely low rate of early-onset GBS in the screened population.</description><subject>Early-onset neonatal sepsis</subject><subject>GBS</subject><subject>GBS rescreening</subject><subject>group B streptococcus</subject><subject>neonatal early-onset GBS</subject><issn>1476-7058</issn><issn>1476-4954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi1UBMuWn0DlYy9Z7MSO7V5aiviSkOBAz5axJzRVEqdjh2r_PYl26ZHTfOiZd6SHkDPONpxpds6FqhWTelMybjZc6lorcUBWy74QRopP-36BjslJSn8YK7lg8ogcV0wbNo8rYh8RXmHI7fBCwWG3LeKQINMXjNNIf9KUEcYcffTedTTBmNr0jbaJ5t-AQB3F2AFtIlKE5BFgWJKGOYpmwP77Z3LYuC7B6b6uya_rq6fL2-L-4ebu8uK-8FVd50JWUjoGTolaBFULEzSvGmeCKpX3wXNmOAvgGsPdc2kqxUrQ3OlgTONDyas1-brLHTH-nSBl27fJQ9e5AeKUbMmNkIYrXc6o3KEeY0oIjR2x7R1uLWd2cWvf3drFrd27ne--7F9Mzz2E_1fvMmfgxw5oh1lI7_5F7ILNbttFbNANvk22-vjHG0goiQ0</recordid><startdate>20201116</startdate><enddate>20201116</enddate><creator>Mirsky, Rachel</creator><creator>Carpenter, Diane M.</creator><creator>Postlethwaite, Debbie A.</creator><creator>Regenstein, Anne C.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201116</creationdate><title>Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term?</title><author>Mirsky, Rachel ; Carpenter, Diane M. ; Postlethwaite, Debbie A. ; Regenstein, Anne C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5355a0ea7464d7649d813fa9d727ccdc10910deaf91ab293702e81a8d99fcd213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Early-onset neonatal sepsis</topic><topic>GBS</topic><topic>GBS rescreening</topic><topic>group B streptococcus</topic><topic>neonatal early-onset GBS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirsky, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Diane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postlethwaite, Debbie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regenstein, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirsky, Rachel</au><au>Carpenter, Diane M.</au><au>Postlethwaite, Debbie A.</au><au>Regenstein, Anne C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term?</atitle><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><date>2020-11-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>3791</spage><epage>3797</epage><pages>3791-3797</pages><issn>1476-7058</issn><eissn>1476-4954</eissn><abstract>Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 guidelines recommend group B streptococcus (GBS) screening at 35-37-week gestation to identify women with positive cultures who should receive intrapartum antibiotics and notes that the predictive value of a negative culture declines after 5 weeks. However, despite the lack of evidence, current guidelines do not recommend rescreening for those screened between 35 and 37 weeks. Our objectives were to investigate the rate of conversion from negative to positive results in women rescreened after appropriate screening at 35-37-week gestation and to examine the impact of rescreening on the use of intrapartum antibiotics. Additionally, we examined cases of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis (early-onset GBS) in term neonates. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women delivering liveborn infants 1 January, 2010-31 December, 2014 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Data were obtained from database extraction and chart review. Results: We identified 135,585 women with GBS screening at 35-37-week gestation; 4511 (3.3%) women were rescreened. Of the 3860 (85.6%) initially screened negative, 218 (5.6%) converted to positive. Fewer women in the discordant negative to positive group received GBS prophylaxis prior to delivery compared with women with a single positive culture (65.9 versus 92.3%, p &lt; .001). In the discordant negative to positive group, results were available at the time of delivery in 133 of 217 subjects (61.3%). There were 18 cases of early-onset GBS at term (0.10 per 1000 livebirths); the majority of cases occurred among women with negative screening. Conclusion: Our results provide support for the current CDC recommendation against rescreening near term for those women already screened at 35-37-week gestation given the low rate of conversion from negative to positive, and the extremely low rate of early-onset GBS in the screened population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>30890002</pmid><doi>10.1080/14767058.2019.1586874</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-7058
ispartof The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 2020-11, Vol.33 (22), p.3791-3797
issn 1476-7058
1476-4954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2194591782
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Early-onset neonatal sepsis
GBS
GBS rescreening
group B streptococcus
neonatal early-onset GBS
title Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A12%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preventing%20early-onset%20group%20B%20streptococcal%20sepsis:%20is%20there%20a%20role%20for%20rescreening%20near%20term?&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20maternal-fetal%20&%20neonatal%20medicine&rft.au=Mirsky,%20Rachel&rft.date=2020-11-16&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=3791&rft.epage=3797&rft.pages=3791-3797&rft.issn=1476-7058&rft.eissn=1476-4954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14767058.2019.1586874&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2194591782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5355a0ea7464d7649d813fa9d727ccdc10910deaf91ab293702e81a8d99fcd213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2194591782&rft_id=info:pmid/30890002&rfr_iscdi=true