Loading…
A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion
Background/Aims To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion. Methods In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 ey...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2019-09, Vol.97 (6), p.e933-e936 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-cd3fc0f2f654057443dc16a9ed576379edf62149f6a9fdb798c12a4e5d47eac23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-cd3fc0f2f654057443dc16a9ed576379edf62149f6a9fdb798c12a4e5d47eac23 |
container_end_page | e936 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e933 |
container_title | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Dulz, Simon Green, Sylvia Mehlan, Juliane Schüttauf, Frank Keserü, Matthias |
description | Background/Aims
To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.
Methods
In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty‐six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow‐up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14‐month follow‐up visit.
Results
A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow‐up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow‐up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow‐up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92–1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85–1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log‐rank test: p = 0.46).
Conclusion
These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aos.14093 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2198560069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2269770306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-cd3fc0f2f654057443dc16a9ed576379edf62149f6a9fdb798c12a4e5d47eac23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8KKH1aRpk_a4LH6BsIgK3kpMJxrtNjVJd_HfO7rqQTCXd5h58jLMS8g-Zycc36n28YTnrBJrZMRVUYyFkuX6b108bJHtGF8Yk1zKfJNsCVZxWZZyRNKEGj_vdXDRd9Rbmp6BtjpB0C1NOkSUmILr6dKlZwoLCMl1TzQOaQgQqe6ary83gzOvOKN98AYanFHrA3XdwrdDcr5DH-hS8D3Wu2TD6jbC3rfukPvzs7vp5fh6dnE1nVyPjShLMTaNsIbZzMoiZ4XKc9EYLnUFTaGkUKhWZjyvLPZs86iq0vBM51A0uQJtMrFDjla-uNTbADHVcxcNtK3uwA-xznhVFhLPUiF6-Ad98UPArZHKZKUUE0widbyiTPAxBrB1H9xch_eas_ozihqjqL-iQPbg23F4nEPzS_7cHoHTFbB0Lbz_71RPZrcryw_y0JTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269770306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Dulz, Simon ; Green, Sylvia ; Mehlan, Juliane ; Schüttauf, Frank ; Keserü, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Dulz, Simon ; Green, Sylvia ; Mehlan, Juliane ; Schüttauf, Frank ; Keserü, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims
To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.
Methods
In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty‐six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow‐up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14‐month follow‐up visit.
Results
A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow‐up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow‐up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow‐up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92–1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85–1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log‐rank test: p = 0.46).
Conclusion
These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aos.14093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30916886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Eyelid ; involutional entropion ; lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures ; Patients ; Quickert procedure ; Randomization ; Rank tests ; Statistical analysis ; Success ; Surgery ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2019-09, Vol.97 (6), p.e933-e936</ispartof><rights>2019 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-cd3fc0f2f654057443dc16a9ed576379edf62149f6a9fdb798c12a4e5d47eac23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-cd3fc0f2f654057443dc16a9ed576379edf62149f6a9fdb798c12a4e5d47eac23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0677-6937 ; 0000-0002-6893-9714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30916886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dulz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehlan, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schüttauf, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keserü, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background/Aims
To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.
Methods
In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty‐six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow‐up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14‐month follow‐up visit.
Results
A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow‐up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow‐up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow‐up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92–1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85–1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log‐rank test: p = 0.46).
Conclusion
These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP).</description><subject>Eyelid</subject><subject>involutional entropion</subject><subject>lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quickert procedure</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Rank tests</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8KKH1aRpk_a4LH6BsIgK3kpMJxrtNjVJd_HfO7rqQTCXd5h58jLMS8g-Zycc36n28YTnrBJrZMRVUYyFkuX6b108bJHtGF8Yk1zKfJNsCVZxWZZyRNKEGj_vdXDRd9Rbmp6BtjpB0C1NOkSUmILr6dKlZwoLCMl1TzQOaQgQqe6ary83gzOvOKN98AYanFHrA3XdwrdDcr5DH-hS8D3Wu2TD6jbC3rfukPvzs7vp5fh6dnE1nVyPjShLMTaNsIbZzMoiZ4XKc9EYLnUFTaGkUKhWZjyvLPZs86iq0vBM51A0uQJtMrFDjla-uNTbADHVcxcNtK3uwA-xznhVFhLPUiF6-Ad98UPArZHKZKUUE0widbyiTPAxBrB1H9xch_eas_ozihqjqL-iQPbg23F4nEPzS_7cHoHTFbB0Lbz_71RPZrcryw_y0JTA</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Dulz, Simon</creator><creator>Green, Sylvia</creator><creator>Mehlan, Juliane</creator><creator>Schüttauf, Frank</creator><creator>Keserü, Matthias</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0677-6937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-9714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion</title><author>Dulz, Simon ; Green, Sylvia ; Mehlan, Juliane ; Schüttauf, Frank ; Keserü, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-cd3fc0f2f654057443dc16a9ed576379edf62149f6a9fdb798c12a4e5d47eac23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Eyelid</topic><topic>involutional entropion</topic><topic>lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quickert procedure</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Rank tests</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dulz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehlan, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schüttauf, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keserü, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dulz, Simon</au><au>Green, Sylvia</au><au>Mehlan, Juliane</au><au>Schüttauf, Frank</au><au>Keserü, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e933</spage><epage>e936</epage><pages>e933-e936</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>Background/Aims
To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.
Methods
In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty‐six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow‐up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14‐month follow‐up visit.
Results
A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow‐up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow‐up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow‐up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92–1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85–1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log‐rank test: p = 0.46).
Conclusion
These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30916886</pmid><doi>10.1111/aos.14093</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0677-6937</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-9714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-375X |
ispartof | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2019-09, Vol.97 (6), p.e933-e936 |
issn | 1755-375X 1755-3768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2198560069 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Eyelid involutional entropion lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures Patients Quickert procedure Randomization Rank tests Statistical analysis Success Surgery Sutures |
title | A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20lateral%20tarsal%20strip%20with%20everting%20sutures%20and%20the%20Quickert%20procedure%20for%20involutional%20entropion&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Dulz,%20Simon&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e933&rft.epage=e936&rft.pages=e933-e936&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aos.14093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2269770306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-cd3fc0f2f654057443dc16a9ed576379edf62149f6a9fdb798c12a4e5d47eac23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269770306&rft_id=info:pmid/30916886&rfr_iscdi=true |