Loading…

Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth

This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology 2019-08, Vol.63 (10), p.1931-1951
Main Authors: Silva, Jason R., Fera, Beth, Sudula, Susruta, Koetzle, Deborah, Schwalbe, Craig
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23
container_end_page 1951
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1931
container_title International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology
container_volume 63
creator Silva, Jason R.
Fera, Beth
Sudula, Susruta
Koetzle, Deborah
Schwalbe, Craig
description This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0306624X19839597
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2199184849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0306624X19839597</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2256039841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNtLwzAYxYMobk7ffZKCL75Uc788yvBSFURQ0KeStens6JKZtBX_e1M2FQbmJeH7fufkcAA4RvAcISEuIIGcY_qKlCSKKbEDxogxnHJFyC4YD-t02I_AQQgLGA-VYh-MCFRRDskY3E_d3NZt3Zsks63xfW0-aztPWpdky5V3cf7UmdDWzlpdexOSyvnkrouTwqSZ7V3TmzJ5c137fgj2Kt0Ec7S5J-Dl-up5eps-PN5k08uHtCCctSkvBOKYaYYJJrooaaUJFDw-jWCwUjMmsKSswLKUM6ow1EohaMoqcpIbTCbgbO0b830M4fJlHQrTNNoa14UcoyiQVFIV0dMtdOE6b2O6HGPGIVGSokjBNVV4F4I3Vb7y9VL7rxzBfCg63y46Sk42xt1sacpfwU-zEUjXQNBz8_frv4bffX2Ezw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256039841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Silva, Jason R. ; Fera, Beth ; Sudula, Susruta ; Koetzle, Deborah ; Schwalbe, Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jason R. ; Fera, Beth ; Sudula, Susruta ; Koetzle, Deborah ; Schwalbe, Craig</creatorcontrib><description>This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-624X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0306624X19839597</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30917703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Ambiguity ; Child ; Cognitive interviews ; Comprehension ; Content analysis ; Criminal justice ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Interviews ; Juvenile Delinquency ; Juvenile justice ; Juvenile offenders ; Male ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Questionnaires ; Reading ; Reading comprehension ; Recidivism ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Youth</subject><ispartof>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 2019-08, Vol.63 (10), p.1931-1951</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fera, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudula, Susruta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetzle, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwalbe, Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</title><title>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology</title><addtitle>Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol</addtitle><description>This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Juvenile Delinquency</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Juvenile offenders</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0306-624X</issn><issn>1552-6933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNtLwzAYxYMobk7ffZKCL75Uc788yvBSFURQ0KeStens6JKZtBX_e1M2FQbmJeH7fufkcAA4RvAcISEuIIGcY_qKlCSKKbEDxogxnHJFyC4YD-t02I_AQQgLGA-VYh-MCFRRDskY3E_d3NZt3Zsks63xfW0-aztPWpdky5V3cf7UmdDWzlpdexOSyvnkrouTwqSZ7V3TmzJ5c137fgj2Kt0Ec7S5J-Dl-up5eps-PN5k08uHtCCctSkvBOKYaYYJJrooaaUJFDw-jWCwUjMmsKSswLKUM6ow1EohaMoqcpIbTCbgbO0b830M4fJlHQrTNNoa14UcoyiQVFIV0dMtdOE6b2O6HGPGIVGSokjBNVV4F4I3Vb7y9VL7rxzBfCg63y46Sk42xt1sacpfwU-zEUjXQNBz8_frv4bffX2Ezw</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Silva, Jason R.</creator><creator>Fera, Beth</creator><creator>Sudula, Susruta</creator><creator>Koetzle, Deborah</creator><creator>Schwalbe, Craig</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</title><author>Silva, Jason R. ; Fera, Beth ; Sudula, Susruta ; Koetzle, Deborah ; Schwalbe, Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Juvenile Delinquency</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Juvenile offenders</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fera, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudula, Susruta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetzle, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwalbe, Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Jason R.</au><au>Fera, Beth</au><au>Sudula, Susruta</au><au>Koetzle, Deborah</au><au>Schwalbe, Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</atitle><jtitle>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1931</spage><epage>1951</epage><pages>1931-1951</pages><issn>0306-624X</issn><eissn>1552-6933</eissn><abstract>This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30917703</pmid><doi>10.1177/0306624X19839597</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-624X
ispartof International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 2019-08, Vol.63 (10), p.1931-1951
issn 0306-624X
1552-6933
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2199184849
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adolescent
Ambiguity
Child
Cognitive interviews
Comprehension
Content analysis
Criminal justice
Female
Humans
Interview, Psychological
Interviews
Juvenile Delinquency
Juvenile justice
Juvenile offenders
Male
Polls & surveys
Questionnaires
Reading
Reading comprehension
Recidivism
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Youth
title Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A28%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20Interviewing%20to%20Improve%20Questionnaires%20for%20Justice-Involved%20Youth&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20offender%20therapy%20and%20comparative%20criminology&rft.au=Silva,%20Jason%20R.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1931&rft.epage=1951&rft.pages=1931-1951&rft.issn=0306-624X&rft.eissn=1552-6933&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0306624X19839597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2256039841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256039841&rft_id=info:pmid/30917703&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0306624X19839597&rfr_iscdi=true