Loading…
Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth
This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology 2019-08, Vol.63 (10), p.1931-1951 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23 |
container_end_page | 1951 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1931 |
container_title | International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Silva, Jason R. Fera, Beth Sudula, Susruta Koetzle, Deborah Schwalbe, Craig |
description | This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0306624X19839597 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2199184849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0306624X19839597</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2256039841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNtLwzAYxYMobk7ffZKCL75Uc788yvBSFURQ0KeStens6JKZtBX_e1M2FQbmJeH7fufkcAA4RvAcISEuIIGcY_qKlCSKKbEDxogxnHJFyC4YD-t02I_AQQgLGA-VYh-MCFRRDskY3E_d3NZt3Zsks63xfW0-aztPWpdky5V3cf7UmdDWzlpdexOSyvnkrouTwqSZ7V3TmzJ5c137fgj2Kt0Ec7S5J-Dl-up5eps-PN5k08uHtCCctSkvBOKYaYYJJrooaaUJFDw-jWCwUjMmsKSswLKUM6ow1EohaMoqcpIbTCbgbO0b830M4fJlHQrTNNoa14UcoyiQVFIV0dMtdOE6b2O6HGPGIVGSokjBNVV4F4I3Vb7y9VL7rxzBfCg63y46Sk42xt1sacpfwU-zEUjXQNBz8_frv4bffX2Ezw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256039841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Silva, Jason R. ; Fera, Beth ; Sudula, Susruta ; Koetzle, Deborah ; Schwalbe, Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jason R. ; Fera, Beth ; Sudula, Susruta ; Koetzle, Deborah ; Schwalbe, Craig</creatorcontrib><description>This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-624X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0306624X19839597</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30917703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Ambiguity ; Child ; Cognitive interviews ; Comprehension ; Content analysis ; Criminal justice ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Interviews ; Juvenile Delinquency ; Juvenile justice ; Juvenile offenders ; Male ; Polls & surveys ; Questionnaires ; Reading ; Reading comprehension ; Recidivism ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Youth</subject><ispartof>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 2019-08, Vol.63 (10), p.1931-1951</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fera, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudula, Susruta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetzle, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwalbe, Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</title><title>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology</title><addtitle>Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol</addtitle><description>This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Juvenile Delinquency</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Juvenile offenders</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0306-624X</issn><issn>1552-6933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNtLwzAYxYMobk7ffZKCL75Uc788yvBSFURQ0KeStens6JKZtBX_e1M2FQbmJeH7fufkcAA4RvAcISEuIIGcY_qKlCSKKbEDxogxnHJFyC4YD-t02I_AQQgLGA-VYh-MCFRRDskY3E_d3NZt3Zsks63xfW0-aztPWpdky5V3cf7UmdDWzlpdexOSyvnkrouTwqSZ7V3TmzJ5c137fgj2Kt0Ec7S5J-Dl-up5eps-PN5k08uHtCCctSkvBOKYaYYJJrooaaUJFDw-jWCwUjMmsKSswLKUM6ow1EohaMoqcpIbTCbgbO0b830M4fJlHQrTNNoa14UcoyiQVFIV0dMtdOE6b2O6HGPGIVGSokjBNVV4F4I3Vb7y9VL7rxzBfCg63y46Sk42xt1sacpfwU-zEUjXQNBz8_frv4bffX2Ezw</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Silva, Jason R.</creator><creator>Fera, Beth</creator><creator>Sudula, Susruta</creator><creator>Koetzle, Deborah</creator><creator>Schwalbe, Craig</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</title><author>Silva, Jason R. ; Fera, Beth ; Sudula, Susruta ; Koetzle, Deborah ; Schwalbe, Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Juvenile Delinquency</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Juvenile offenders</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fera, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudula, Susruta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koetzle, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwalbe, Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Jason R.</au><au>Fera, Beth</au><au>Sudula, Susruta</au><au>Koetzle, Deborah</au><au>Schwalbe, Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth</atitle><jtitle>International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1931</spage><epage>1951</epage><pages>1931-1951</pages><issn>0306-624X</issn><eissn>1552-6933</eissn><abstract>This study demonstrates the utility of cognitive interviewing for survey and scale development in criminal justice research and identifies common comprehension problems with survey items for justice-involved youth. A cognitive interviewing strategy was utilized with a sample of youth who completed a survey examining risk factors for recidivism. A content analysis of interviews was used to identify patterns and to classify the nature and type of comprehension issues youth experienced. Five specific comprehension issues were identified including reading comprehension, item ambiguity, precondition binds, double-barreled questions, and double negatives. Findings illustrate the value of cognitive interviewing for pretesting survey items for justice-involved youth and provide further insight into issues surrounding word choice, question structure, and response sets. Results also point to the need to reassess the validity of established scales used in contemporary studies. Limitations of the current study and implications for future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30917703</pmid><doi>10.1177/0306624X19839597</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-624X |
ispartof | International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 2019-08, Vol.63 (10), p.1931-1951 |
issn | 0306-624X 1552-6933 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2199184849 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adolescent Ambiguity Child Cognitive interviews Comprehension Content analysis Criminal justice Female Humans Interview, Psychological Interviews Juvenile Delinquency Juvenile justice Juvenile offenders Male Polls & surveys Questionnaires Reading Reading comprehension Recidivism Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors Surveys and Questionnaires Youth |
title | Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Questionnaires for Justice-Involved Youth |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A28%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20Interviewing%20to%20Improve%20Questionnaires%20for%20Justice-Involved%20Youth&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20offender%20therapy%20and%20comparative%20criminology&rft.au=Silva,%20Jason%20R.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1931&rft.epage=1951&rft.pages=1931-1951&rft.issn=0306-624X&rft.eissn=1552-6933&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0306624X19839597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2256039841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-6c71625a52323acd4fa30763ace750f9b572845c28d8b4920a9910edffa386e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256039841&rft_id=info:pmid/30917703&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0306624X19839597&rfr_iscdi=true |