Loading…

Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing

Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2019-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2437-2451
Main Authors: Falbén, Johanna K, Tsamadi, Dimitra, Golubickis, Marius, Olivier, Juliana L, Persson, Linn M, Cunningham, William A, Macrae, C Neil
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233
container_end_page 2451
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2437
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 72
creator Falbén, Johanna K
Tsamadi, Dimitra
Golubickis, Marius
Olivier, Juliana L
Persson, Linn M
Cunningham, William A
Macrae, C Neil
description Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1747021819844219
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201711039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747021819844219</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2283204705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcmCFy_Rnd00m3iT4hcUFKznsNnM1pQkW3eTQ_57t7RWKHia4fGbN49HyCWwWwAp70DGknFIIUvjmEN2RMYbKWKcJ8f7HdIROfN-xVgsZCJPyUiwTIDMsjH5eHdYVrpTRT1QbVtTuUZ11g33dPGFtGpN3WOrkVpDfYcObTes0dOyd1W7pCXqyle2VTVdO6vR-6CekxOjao8Xuzkhn0-Pi9lLNH97fp09zCMdM9lFyErkaQLCoE5hikokUIDUSqKGYhoLRCGZ4ZqDYKaQSVrIoBVZSM8LLsSE3Gx9w-vvHn2XN5XXWNeqRdv7nHMGEoCJLKDXB-jK9i7E3lCp4Cz0OA0U21LaWe8dmnztqka5IQeWbwrPDwsPJ1c7475osNwf_DYcgGgLeLXEv6__Gv4AApmH9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283204705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Falbén, Johanna K ; Tsamadi, Dimitra ; Golubickis, Marius ; Olivier, Juliana L ; Persson, Linn M ; Cunningham, William A ; Macrae, C Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Falbén, Johanna K ; Tsamadi, Dimitra ; Golubickis, Marius ; Olivier, Juliana L ; Persson, Linn M ; Cunningham, William A ; Macrae, C Neil</creatorcontrib><description>Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747021819844219</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30931799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Decision Making - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Social Perception ; Stereotypes ; Stereotyping ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2019-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2437-2451</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4711-1771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,79135</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falbén, Johanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsamadi, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubickis, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Juliana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persson, Linn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrae, C Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcmCFy_Rnd00m3iT4hcUFKznsNnM1pQkW3eTQ_57t7RWKHia4fGbN49HyCWwWwAp70DGknFIIUvjmEN2RMYbKWKcJ8f7HdIROfN-xVgsZCJPyUiwTIDMsjH5eHdYVrpTRT1QbVtTuUZ11g33dPGFtGpN3WOrkVpDfYcObTes0dOyd1W7pCXqyle2VTVdO6vR-6CekxOjao8Xuzkhn0-Pi9lLNH97fp09zCMdM9lFyErkaQLCoE5hikokUIDUSqKGYhoLRCGZ4ZqDYKaQSVrIoBVZSM8LLsSE3Gx9w-vvHn2XN5XXWNeqRdv7nHMGEoCJLKDXB-jK9i7E3lCp4Cz0OA0U21LaWe8dmnztqka5IQeWbwrPDwsPJ1c7475osNwf_DYcgGgLeLXEv6__Gv4AApmH9w</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Falbén, Johanna K</creator><creator>Tsamadi, Dimitra</creator><creator>Golubickis, Marius</creator><creator>Olivier, Juliana L</creator><creator>Persson, Linn M</creator><creator>Cunningham, William A</creator><creator>Macrae, C Neil</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4711-1771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</title><author>Falbén, Johanna K ; Tsamadi, Dimitra ; Golubickis, Marius ; Olivier, Juliana L ; Persson, Linn M ; Cunningham, William A ; Macrae, C Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falbén, Johanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsamadi, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubickis, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Juliana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persson, Linn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrae, C Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falbén, Johanna K</au><au>Tsamadi, Dimitra</au><au>Golubickis, Marius</au><au>Olivier, Juliana L</au><au>Persson, Linn M</au><au>Cunningham, William A</au><au>Macrae, C Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2437</spage><epage>2451</epage><pages>2437-2451</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30931799</pmid><doi>10.1177/1747021819844219</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4711-1771</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2019-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2437-2451
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201711039
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Adult
Decision Making - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Models, Theoretical
Social Perception
Stereotypes
Stereotyping
Task Performance and Analysis
Young Adult
title Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T06%3A53%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictably%20confirmatory:%20The%20influence%20of%20stereotypes%20during%20decisional%20processing&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Falb%C3%A9n,%20Johanna%20K&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2437&rft.epage=2451&rft.pages=2437-2451&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747021819844219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283204705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283204705&rft_id=info:pmid/30931799&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747021819844219&rfr_iscdi=true