Loading…
Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing
Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2019-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2437-2451 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233 |
container_end_page | 2451 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2437 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Falbén, Johanna K Tsamadi, Dimitra Golubickis, Marius Olivier, Juliana L Persson, Linn M Cunningham, William A Macrae, C Neil |
description | Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1747021819844219 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201711039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747021819844219</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2283204705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcmCFy_Rnd00m3iT4hcUFKznsNnM1pQkW3eTQ_57t7RWKHia4fGbN49HyCWwWwAp70DGknFIIUvjmEN2RMYbKWKcJ8f7HdIROfN-xVgsZCJPyUiwTIDMsjH5eHdYVrpTRT1QbVtTuUZ11g33dPGFtGpN3WOrkVpDfYcObTes0dOyd1W7pCXqyle2VTVdO6vR-6CekxOjao8Xuzkhn0-Pi9lLNH97fp09zCMdM9lFyErkaQLCoE5hikokUIDUSqKGYhoLRCGZ4ZqDYKaQSVrIoBVZSM8LLsSE3Gx9w-vvHn2XN5XXWNeqRdv7nHMGEoCJLKDXB-jK9i7E3lCp4Cz0OA0U21LaWe8dmnztqka5IQeWbwrPDwsPJ1c7475osNwf_DYcgGgLeLXEv6__Gv4AApmH9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283204705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Falbén, Johanna K ; Tsamadi, Dimitra ; Golubickis, Marius ; Olivier, Juliana L ; Persson, Linn M ; Cunningham, William A ; Macrae, C Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Falbén, Johanna K ; Tsamadi, Dimitra ; Golubickis, Marius ; Olivier, Juliana L ; Persson, Linn M ; Cunningham, William A ; Macrae, C Neil</creatorcontrib><description>Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747021819844219</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30931799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Decision Making - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Social Perception ; Stereotypes ; Stereotyping ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2019-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2437-2451</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4711-1771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,79135</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falbén, Johanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsamadi, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubickis, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Juliana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persson, Linn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrae, C Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcmCFy_Rnd00m3iT4hcUFKznsNnM1pQkW3eTQ_57t7RWKHia4fGbN49HyCWwWwAp70DGknFIIUvjmEN2RMYbKWKcJ8f7HdIROfN-xVgsZCJPyUiwTIDMsjH5eHdYVrpTRT1QbVtTuUZ11g33dPGFtGpN3WOrkVpDfYcObTes0dOyd1W7pCXqyle2VTVdO6vR-6CekxOjao8Xuzkhn0-Pi9lLNH97fp09zCMdM9lFyErkaQLCoE5hikokUIDUSqKGYhoLRCGZ4ZqDYKaQSVrIoBVZSM8LLsSE3Gx9w-vvHn2XN5XXWNeqRdv7nHMGEoCJLKDXB-jK9i7E3lCp4Cz0OA0U21LaWe8dmnztqka5IQeWbwrPDwsPJ1c7475osNwf_DYcgGgLeLXEv6__Gv4AApmH9w</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Falbén, Johanna K</creator><creator>Tsamadi, Dimitra</creator><creator>Golubickis, Marius</creator><creator>Olivier, Juliana L</creator><creator>Persson, Linn M</creator><creator>Cunningham, William A</creator><creator>Macrae, C Neil</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4711-1771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</title><author>Falbén, Johanna K ; Tsamadi, Dimitra ; Golubickis, Marius ; Olivier, Juliana L ; Persson, Linn M ; Cunningham, William A ; Macrae, C Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falbén, Johanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsamadi, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golubickis, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Juliana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persson, Linn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrae, C Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falbén, Johanna K</au><au>Tsamadi, Dimitra</au><au>Golubickis, Marius</au><au>Olivier, Juliana L</au><au>Persson, Linn M</au><au>Cunningham, William A</au><au>Macrae, C Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2437</spage><epage>2451</epage><pages>2437-2451</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Stereotypes facilitate the processing of expectancy-consistent (vs expectancy-inconsistent) information, yet the underlying origin of this congruency effect remains unknown. As such, here we sought to identify the cognitive operations through which stereotypes influence decisional processing. In six experiments, participants responded to stimuli that were consistent or inconsistent with respect to prevailing gender stereotypes. To identify the processes underpinning task performance, responses were submitted to a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) analysis. A consistent pattern of results emerged. Whether manipulated at the level of occupational (Expts. 1, 3, and 5) or trait-based (Expts. 2, 4, and 6) expectancies, stereotypes facilitated task performance and influenced decisional processing via a combination of response and stimulus biases. Specifically, (1) stereotype-consistent stimuli were classified more rapidly than stereotype-inconsistent stimuli; (2) stereotypic responses were favoured over counter-stereotypic responses (i.e., starting-point shift towards stereotypic responses); (3) less evidence was required when responding to stereotypic than counter-stereotypic stimuli (i.e., narrower threshold separation for stereotypic stimuli); and (4) decisional evidence was accumulated more efficiently for stereotype-inconsistent than stereotype-consistent stimuli and when targets had a typical than atypical facial appearance. Collectively, these findings elucidate how stereotypes influence person construal.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30931799</pmid><doi>10.1177/1747021819844219</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4711-1771</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2019-10, Vol.72 (10), p.2437-2451 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201711039 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Adult Decision Making - physiology Female Humans Male Models, Theoretical Social Perception Stereotypes Stereotyping Task Performance and Analysis Young Adult |
title | Predictably confirmatory: The influence of stereotypes during decisional processing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T06%3A53%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictably%20confirmatory:%20The%20influence%20of%20stereotypes%20during%20decisional%20processing&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Falb%C3%A9n,%20Johanna%20K&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2437&rft.epage=2451&rft.pages=2437-2451&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747021819844219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2283204705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-e0de28613fec815ea361b17ca7ec1b543ee370f2c2130fb768b73eeb93092b233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283204705&rft_id=info:pmid/30931799&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747021819844219&rfr_iscdi=true |