Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty

Reconstruction of proximal humeral bone defects in the setting of shoulder revision arthroplasty by implantation of a modular humeral component. Severe segmental humeral bone defects in revision total shoulder arthroplasty, after tumor resection, trauma, pathological fractures, post-infectious or af...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 2019-04, Vol.31 (2), p.115-126
Main Authors: Friedrich, M, Cucchi, D, Walter, S, Gravius, S, Wirtz, D C, Schmolders, J
Format: Article
Language:ger
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 126
container_issue 2
container_start_page 115
container_title Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie
container_volume 31
creator Friedrich, M
Cucchi, D
Walter, S
Gravius, S
Wirtz, D C
Schmolders, J
description Reconstruction of proximal humeral bone defects in the setting of shoulder revision arthroplasty by implantation of a modular humeral component. Severe segmental humeral bone defects in revision total shoulder arthroplasty, after tumor resection, trauma, pathological fractures, post-infectious or after failed osteosynthesis. Acute or chronic local infections, large diaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00064-019-0588-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2202672284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2202672284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-48f9b91bfecbef40c1ca54f60c5ac516da9babe9c55776be026ad0df839939023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9LxDAQxYMg7rr6AbxIjl6q-d_mKMu6Cgte1nNJ0wmttE1NUnG_vQHX0_Bmfm94MwjdUfJICSmfIiFEiYJQXRBZVYW6QGsqeFa6oit0HeNnJrgq6RVacVIySalco-Nuav0cfEwdpN7iAPNgLIwwJewdzl2cpz_9aAbcLSOEJeJ-yth3H3s_4dj5ZWghYBNSF3w2x3S6QZfODBFuz3WDPl52x-1rcXjfv22fD8VMBU2FqJxuNG0c2AacIJZaI4VTxEpjJVWt0Y1pQFspy1I1QJgyLWldxbXmmjC-QQ9_e3PErwViqsc-WhgGM4FfYs1YtpSMVSKj92d0aUZo6znkk8Kp_v8E_wVAPGDj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2202672284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Friedrich, M ; Cucchi, D ; Walter, S ; Gravius, S ; Wirtz, D C ; Schmolders, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, M ; Cucchi, D ; Walter, S ; Gravius, S ; Wirtz, D C ; Schmolders, J</creatorcontrib><description>Reconstruction of proximal humeral bone defects in the setting of shoulder revision arthroplasty by implantation of a modular humeral component. Severe segmental humeral bone defects in revision total shoulder arthroplasty, after tumor resection, trauma, pathological fractures, post-infectious or after failed osteosynthesis. Acute or chronic local infections, large diaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (&lt;3 months). Removal of the implant using an extended deltopectoral approach. Periarticular arthrolysis with preservation of neurovascular structures. Resection of the meta-diaphyseal bone and reconstruction of the humeral length with the help of different extension sleeves and a modular humeral component. Soft tissue management is crucial, especially with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Three weeks postoperatively immobilization in a shoulder sling, active assisted movement therapy by gradual pain-adapted increase of movement, muscle coordination, and strength. The results of 11 consecutive patients treated with a modular humeral component due to a failed shoulder arthroplasty between 2008 and 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Mean length of reconstruction was 100 mm. Due to recurrent dislocations one patient required revision and conversion to a reverse component. No cases of aseptic loosening or periprosthetic infection were observed.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00064-019-0588-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30725115</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><ispartof>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2019-04, Vol.31 (2), p.115-126</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30725115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucchi, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravius, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmolders, J</creatorcontrib><title>Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</title><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><description>Reconstruction of proximal humeral bone defects in the setting of shoulder revision arthroplasty by implantation of a modular humeral component. Severe segmental humeral bone defects in revision total shoulder arthroplasty, after tumor resection, trauma, pathological fractures, post-infectious or after failed osteosynthesis. Acute or chronic local infections, large diaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (&lt;3 months). Removal of the implant using an extended deltopectoral approach. Periarticular arthrolysis with preservation of neurovascular structures. Resection of the meta-diaphyseal bone and reconstruction of the humeral length with the help of different extension sleeves and a modular humeral component. Soft tissue management is crucial, especially with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Three weeks postoperatively immobilization in a shoulder sling, active assisted movement therapy by gradual pain-adapted increase of movement, muscle coordination, and strength. The results of 11 consecutive patients treated with a modular humeral component due to a failed shoulder arthroplasty between 2008 and 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Mean length of reconstruction was 100 mm. Due to recurrent dislocations one patient required revision and conversion to a reverse component. No cases of aseptic loosening or periprosthetic infection were observed.</description><issn>1439-0981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE9LxDAQxYMg7rr6AbxIjl6q-d_mKMu6Cgte1nNJ0wmttE1NUnG_vQHX0_Bmfm94MwjdUfJICSmfIiFEiYJQXRBZVYW6QGsqeFa6oit0HeNnJrgq6RVacVIySalco-Nuav0cfEwdpN7iAPNgLIwwJewdzl2cpz_9aAbcLSOEJeJ-yth3H3s_4dj5ZWghYBNSF3w2x3S6QZfODBFuz3WDPl52x-1rcXjfv22fD8VMBU2FqJxuNG0c2AacIJZaI4VTxEpjJVWt0Y1pQFspy1I1QJgyLWldxbXmmjC-QQ9_e3PErwViqsc-WhgGM4FfYs1YtpSMVSKj92d0aUZo6znkk8Kp_v8E_wVAPGDj</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Friedrich, M</creator><creator>Cucchi, D</creator><creator>Walter, S</creator><creator>Gravius, S</creator><creator>Wirtz, D C</creator><creator>Schmolders, J</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Friedrich, M ; Cucchi, D ; Walter, S ; Gravius, S ; Wirtz, D C ; Schmolders, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-48f9b91bfecbef40c1ca54f60c5ac516da9babe9c55776be026ad0df839939023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucchi, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravius, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmolders, J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedrich, M</au><au>Cucchi, D</au><au>Walter, S</au><au>Gravius, S</au><au>Wirtz, D C</au><au>Schmolders, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>115-126</pages><eissn>1439-0981</eissn><abstract>Reconstruction of proximal humeral bone defects in the setting of shoulder revision arthroplasty by implantation of a modular humeral component. Severe segmental humeral bone defects in revision total shoulder arthroplasty, after tumor resection, trauma, pathological fractures, post-infectious or after failed osteosynthesis. Acute or chronic local infections, large diaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (&lt;3 months). Removal of the implant using an extended deltopectoral approach. Periarticular arthrolysis with preservation of neurovascular structures. Resection of the meta-diaphyseal bone and reconstruction of the humeral length with the help of different extension sleeves and a modular humeral component. Soft tissue management is crucial, especially with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Three weeks postoperatively immobilization in a shoulder sling, active assisted movement therapy by gradual pain-adapted increase of movement, muscle coordination, and strength. The results of 11 consecutive patients treated with a modular humeral component due to a failed shoulder arthroplasty between 2008 and 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Mean length of reconstruction was 100 mm. Due to recurrent dislocations one patient required revision and conversion to a reverse component. No cases of aseptic loosening or periprosthetic infection were observed.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>30725115</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00064-019-0588-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1439-0981
ispartof Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2019-04, Vol.31 (2), p.115-126
issn 1439-0981
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2202672284
source Springer Nature
title Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in revision shoulder arthroplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoprosthetic%20replacement%20of%20the%20proximal%20humerus%20in%20revision%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Operative%20Orthop%C3%A4die%20und%20Traumatologie&rft.au=Friedrich,%20M&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=115-126&rft.eissn=1439-0981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00064-019-0588-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2202672284%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-48f9b91bfecbef40c1ca54f60c5ac516da9babe9c55776be026ad0df839939023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2202672284&rft_id=info:pmid/30725115&rfr_iscdi=true