Loading…
Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Purpose To report clinical and functional results of ACL reconstruction in patients over 50 years old and investigate the influence of surgery on osteoarthritis progression in this cohort of patients. Methods A systematic review was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, Cochrane library and E...
Saved in:
Published in: | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019-11, Vol.27 (11), p.3679-3691 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1c2198945815ea734afe0026940d1a9996de9cb781928f71031ce542035caf063 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1c2198945815ea734afe0026940d1a9996de9cb781928f71031ce542035caf063 |
container_end_page | 3691 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3679 |
container_title | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca Grassi, Alberto Perelli, Simone Agrò, Giuseppe Bozzi, Federico Lo Presti, Mirco Zaffagnini, Stefano |
description | Purpose
To report clinical and functional results of ACL reconstruction in patients over 50 years old and investigate the influence of surgery on osteoarthritis progression in this cohort of patients.
Methods
A systematic review was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, Cochrane library and EMBASE, using a strategy search design to collect clinical studies reporting outcomes of ACL reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older. The primary outcome measure was clinical and functional results, including failure rate defined as reoperation for revision ACL surgery or conversion to total knee arthroplasty; secondary outcomes included radiological findings, expressed according to the validated grading score.
Results
A total of 16 studies were found suitable and included. Overall, 470 arthroscopic ACL reconstructions were performed in 468 patients (278 males, 190 females), with a mean age of 53.6 years (50–75 years). The total failure rate, described as reoperation for revision ACL surgery was 2.7% (10 knees), ranging from 0 to 14.3% in the selected studies. All papers reviewed showed a statistically significant improvement of clinical and functional scores at final follow-up, comparable to younger control group, when reported. Post-operative objective stability testing with KT-1000 arthrometer device or equivalent was performed in seven studies, with a mean side-to-side difference of 2.2 mm (0.2–2.7 mm). Radiographic signs of progression of osteoarthritis were reported in six studies, where severe signs of degeneration (grade 3 or 4 according Kellgren–Lawrence or Ahlbäck classification) shifted from 4 out of 216 knees (1.9%) before surgery to 28 out of 187 knees (15%) following ACL reconstruction, after a mean period of follow-up ranging from 32 to 64 months.
Conclusion
ACL reconstruction in patients older than 50 years is a safe procedure with good results that are comparable to those of younger patients previously reported. Age itself is not a contraindication to ACL surgery because physiological age, clinical symptoms and functional requests are more important than chronological age in decision process. Since cohort size in the present study is not large enough, and taking into account the high occurrence of concomitant meniscal and chondral lesions, more high-quality studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions about development of osteoarthritis of the knee after ACL surgery in these patients.
Level of evidence
IV. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00167-019-05450-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2203137839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2203137839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1c2198945815ea734afe0026940d1a9996de9cb781928f71031ce542035caf063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OWzEQha2qqAm0L9AFstRNNxfGf9fXS4QoICF1Axs2lnHmRo4Sm9q-lXgbnoUnq0NSKrHoyiPPd84cHUK-MjhhAPq0ALBed8BMB0oq6NgHMmdSiE4LqT-SORjJOw6qn5HDUlYAbZTmE5mJtpFGqjm5P1siTb8xUwUvz0_ocqGh0JgqddSnWLMLcRG8qyFFOqZMXayYQxt8nnxwFek6LN0GY6UZm6LU9r-lP5OD0a0Lftm_R-Tux8Xt-VV38_Py-vzspvNCq9oxz5kZWpiBKXQtuRsRgPdGwoI5Y0y_QOMf9MAMH0bNQDCPSnIQyrsRenFEvu98H3P6NWGpdhOKx_XaRUxTsbyhTOhBmIZ-e4eu0pRjS7eleN8PWuhG8R3lcyol42gfc9i4_GQZ2G3zdte8bc3b1-Yta6LjvfX0sMHFm-Rv1Q0QO6C0VVxi_nf7P7Z_AJ4vjbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2202668737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca ; Grassi, Alberto ; Perelli, Simone ; Agrò, Giuseppe ; Bozzi, Federico ; Lo Presti, Mirco ; Zaffagnini, Stefano</creator><creatorcontrib>Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca ; Grassi, Alberto ; Perelli, Simone ; Agrò, Giuseppe ; Bozzi, Federico ; Lo Presti, Mirco ; Zaffagnini, Stefano</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To report clinical and functional results of ACL reconstruction in patients over 50 years old and investigate the influence of surgery on osteoarthritis progression in this cohort of patients.
Methods
A systematic review was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, Cochrane library and EMBASE, using a strategy search design to collect clinical studies reporting outcomes of ACL reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older. The primary outcome measure was clinical and functional results, including failure rate defined as reoperation for revision ACL surgery or conversion to total knee arthroplasty; secondary outcomes included radiological findings, expressed according to the validated grading score.
Results
A total of 16 studies were found suitable and included. Overall, 470 arthroscopic ACL reconstructions were performed in 468 patients (278 males, 190 females), with a mean age of 53.6 years (50–75 years). The total failure rate, described as reoperation for revision ACL surgery was 2.7% (10 knees), ranging from 0 to 14.3% in the selected studies. All papers reviewed showed a statistically significant improvement of clinical and functional scores at final follow-up, comparable to younger control group, when reported. Post-operative objective stability testing with KT-1000 arthrometer device or equivalent was performed in seven studies, with a mean side-to-side difference of 2.2 mm (0.2–2.7 mm). Radiographic signs of progression of osteoarthritis were reported in six studies, where severe signs of degeneration (grade 3 or 4 according Kellgren–Lawrence or Ahlbäck classification) shifted from 4 out of 216 knees (1.9%) before surgery to 28 out of 187 knees (15%) following ACL reconstruction, after a mean period of follow-up ranging from 32 to 64 months.
Conclusion
ACL reconstruction in patients older than 50 years is a safe procedure with good results that are comparable to those of younger patients previously reported. Age itself is not a contraindication to ACL surgery because physiological age, clinical symptoms and functional requests are more important than chronological age in decision process. Since cohort size in the present study is not large enough, and taking into account the high occurrence of concomitant meniscal and chondral lesions, more high-quality studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions about development of osteoarthritis of the knee after ACL surgery in these patients.
Level of evidence
IV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05450-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30944945</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Age Factors ; Anterior cruciate ligament ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects ; Arthritis ; Arthroplasty (knee) ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Biocompatibility ; Biomedical materials ; Contraindications, Procedure ; Control stability ; Degeneration ; Disease Progression ; Evaluation ; Failure rates ; Female ; Females ; Humans ; Joint Instability - diagnosis ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Lesions ; Male ; Males ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meniscus ; Meniscus - injuries ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications ; Reoperation ; Scientific papers ; Search engines ; Second-Look Surgery ; Signs and symptoms ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Surgical implants ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019-11, Vol.27 (11), p.3679-3691</ispartof><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019</rights><rights>Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1c2198945815ea734afe0026940d1a9996de9cb781928f71031ce542035caf063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1c2198945815ea734afe0026940d1a9996de9cb781928f71031ce542035caf063</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4672-0778</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944945$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perelli, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrò, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozzi, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Presti, Mirco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creatorcontrib><title>Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>Purpose
To report clinical and functional results of ACL reconstruction in patients over 50 years old and investigate the influence of surgery on osteoarthritis progression in this cohort of patients.
Methods
A systematic review was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, Cochrane library and EMBASE, using a strategy search design to collect clinical studies reporting outcomes of ACL reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older. The primary outcome measure was clinical and functional results, including failure rate defined as reoperation for revision ACL surgery or conversion to total knee arthroplasty; secondary outcomes included radiological findings, expressed according to the validated grading score.
Results
A total of 16 studies were found suitable and included. Overall, 470 arthroscopic ACL reconstructions were performed in 468 patients (278 males, 190 females), with a mean age of 53.6 years (50–75 years). The total failure rate, described as reoperation for revision ACL surgery was 2.7% (10 knees), ranging from 0 to 14.3% in the selected studies. All papers reviewed showed a statistically significant improvement of clinical and functional scores at final follow-up, comparable to younger control group, when reported. Post-operative objective stability testing with KT-1000 arthrometer device or equivalent was performed in seven studies, with a mean side-to-side difference of 2.2 mm (0.2–2.7 mm). Radiographic signs of progression of osteoarthritis were reported in six studies, where severe signs of degeneration (grade 3 or 4 according Kellgren–Lawrence or Ahlbäck classification) shifted from 4 out of 216 knees (1.9%) before surgery to 28 out of 187 knees (15%) following ACL reconstruction, after a mean period of follow-up ranging from 32 to 64 months.
Conclusion
ACL reconstruction in patients older than 50 years is a safe procedure with good results that are comparable to those of younger patients previously reported. Age itself is not a contraindication to ACL surgery because physiological age, clinical symptoms and functional requests are more important than chronological age in decision process. Since cohort size in the present study is not large enough, and taking into account the high occurrence of concomitant meniscal and chondral lesions, more high-quality studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions about development of osteoarthritis of the knee after ACL surgery in these patients.
Level of evidence
IV.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Contraindications, Procedure</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Degeneration</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Failure rates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meniscus</subject><subject>Meniscus - injuries</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Scientific papers</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Second-Look Surgery</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OWzEQha2qqAm0L9AFstRNNxfGf9fXS4QoICF1Axs2lnHmRo4Sm9q-lXgbnoUnq0NSKrHoyiPPd84cHUK-MjhhAPq0ALBed8BMB0oq6NgHMmdSiE4LqT-SORjJOw6qn5HDUlYAbZTmE5mJtpFGqjm5P1siTb8xUwUvz0_ocqGh0JgqddSnWLMLcRG8qyFFOqZMXayYQxt8nnxwFek6LN0GY6UZm6LU9r-lP5OD0a0Lftm_R-Tux8Xt-VV38_Py-vzspvNCq9oxz5kZWpiBKXQtuRsRgPdGwoI5Y0y_QOMf9MAMH0bNQDCPSnIQyrsRenFEvu98H3P6NWGpdhOKx_XaRUxTsbyhTOhBmIZ-e4eu0pRjS7eleN8PWuhG8R3lcyol42gfc9i4_GQZ2G3zdte8bc3b1-Yta6LjvfX0sMHFm-Rv1Q0QO6C0VVxi_nf7P7Z_AJ4vjbA</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca</creator><creator>Grassi, Alberto</creator><creator>Perelli, Simone</creator><creator>Agrò, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Bozzi, Federico</creator><creator>Lo Presti, Mirco</creator><creator>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-0778</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</title><author>Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca ; Grassi, Alberto ; Perelli, Simone ; Agrò, Giuseppe ; Bozzi, Federico ; Lo Presti, Mirco ; Zaffagnini, Stefano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1c2198945815ea734afe0026940d1a9996de9cb781928f71031ce542035caf063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Contraindications, Procedure</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Degeneration</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Failure rates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meniscus</topic><topic>Meniscus - injuries</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Scientific papers</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Second-Look Surgery</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perelli, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrò, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozzi, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Presti, Mirco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaffagnini, Stefano</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costa, Giuseppe Gianluca</au><au>Grassi, Alberto</au><au>Perelli, Simone</au><au>Agrò, Giuseppe</au><au>Bozzi, Federico</au><au>Lo Presti, Mirco</au><au>Zaffagnini, Stefano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><stitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</stitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3679</spage><epage>3691</epage><pages>3679-3691</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To report clinical and functional results of ACL reconstruction in patients over 50 years old and investigate the influence of surgery on osteoarthritis progression in this cohort of patients.
Methods
A systematic review was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, Cochrane library and EMBASE, using a strategy search design to collect clinical studies reporting outcomes of ACL reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older. The primary outcome measure was clinical and functional results, including failure rate defined as reoperation for revision ACL surgery or conversion to total knee arthroplasty; secondary outcomes included radiological findings, expressed according to the validated grading score.
Results
A total of 16 studies were found suitable and included. Overall, 470 arthroscopic ACL reconstructions were performed in 468 patients (278 males, 190 females), with a mean age of 53.6 years (50–75 years). The total failure rate, described as reoperation for revision ACL surgery was 2.7% (10 knees), ranging from 0 to 14.3% in the selected studies. All papers reviewed showed a statistically significant improvement of clinical and functional scores at final follow-up, comparable to younger control group, when reported. Post-operative objective stability testing with KT-1000 arthrometer device or equivalent was performed in seven studies, with a mean side-to-side difference of 2.2 mm (0.2–2.7 mm). Radiographic signs of progression of osteoarthritis were reported in six studies, where severe signs of degeneration (grade 3 or 4 according Kellgren–Lawrence or Ahlbäck classification) shifted from 4 out of 216 knees (1.9%) before surgery to 28 out of 187 knees (15%) following ACL reconstruction, after a mean period of follow-up ranging from 32 to 64 months.
Conclusion
ACL reconstruction in patients older than 50 years is a safe procedure with good results that are comparable to those of younger patients previously reported. Age itself is not a contraindication to ACL surgery because physiological age, clinical symptoms and functional requests are more important than chronological age in decision process. Since cohort size in the present study is not large enough, and taking into account the high occurrence of concomitant meniscal and chondral lesions, more high-quality studies are necessary to draw definitive conclusions about development of osteoarthritis of the knee after ACL surgery in these patients.
Level of evidence
IV.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30944945</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-019-05450-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4672-0778</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0942-2056 |
ispartof | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019-11, Vol.27 (11), p.3679-3691 |
issn | 0942-2056 1433-7347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2203137839 |
source | EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Springer Link |
subjects | Age Age Factors Anterior cruciate ligament Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - adverse effects Arthritis Arthroplasty (knee) Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Biocompatibility Biomedical materials Contraindications, Procedure Control stability Degeneration Disease Progression Evaluation Failure rates Female Females Humans Joint Instability - diagnosis Joint surgery Knee Lesions Male Males Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meniscus Meniscus - injuries Middle Aged Orthopedics Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis Patients Postoperative Complications Reoperation Scientific papers Search engines Second-Look Surgery Signs and symptoms Statistical analysis Surgery Surgical implants Treatment Failure |
title | Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A12%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age%20over%2050%C2%A0years%20is%20not%20a%20contraindication%20for%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Costa,%20Giuseppe%20Gianluca&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3679&rft.epage=3691&rft.pages=3679-3691&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-019-05450-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2203137839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1c2198945815ea734afe0026940d1a9996de9cb781928f71031ce542035caf063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2202668737&rft_id=info:pmid/30944945&rfr_iscdi=true |