Loading…

Sudden Gains in the Alliance in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Brief Relational Therapy

Objective: Two decades of empirical research suggest that changes in symptoms are not linear, and many patients gain much of their symptom reduction in one between-sessions interval. Theoretically, such gains are expected to be manifested in the working alliance as well, following a rupture session;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2019-06, Vol.87 (6), p.501-509
Main Authors: Zilcha-Mano, Sigal, Eubanks, Catherine F, Muran, J. Christopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-40ccc9a78293fa9125946cf2833880dc17af02ac0d1ae973ff31c048b20870523
cites
container_end_page 509
container_issue 6
container_start_page 501
container_title Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
container_volume 87
creator Zilcha-Mano, Sigal
Eubanks, Catherine F
Muran, J. Christopher
description Objective: Two decades of empirical research suggest that changes in symptoms are not linear, and many patients gain much of their symptom reduction in one between-sessions interval. Theoretically, such gains are expected to be manifested in the working alliance as well, following a rupture session; however, no study to date has directly examined between-sessions sudden gains in the alliance. In the present study we examined whether ruptures predict subsequent sudden gains in the alliance, which in turn show an effect on outcome that is specific to the treatment in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change. Method: In a sample of 241 patient-therapist dyads, patients received either brief relational therapy (BRT), in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change, or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), in which it is not. We examined whether patient and therapist reports of ruptures predicted sudden gains in alliance in the subsequent session, and whether early sudden gains in alliance were significantly associated with treatment outcome in BRT versus CBT. Results: Rupture sessions, as reported by therapists but not by patients, predicted a sudden gain in both patient and therapist-reported alliance in the subsequent session. Findings revealed a moderating effect of treatment condition on the association between sudden gains and treatment outcome, in which gains in alliance were associated with better treatment outcome in BRT than in CBT. Conclusions: The findings support the potential role of gains in alliance as a specific mechanism of change in BRT versus CBT. What is the public health significance of this article? The findings suggest that for many patients much of the improvement in alliance occurs in a single between-sessions interval, following a session in which the therapist reported a rupture. Such alliance gains may show a specific association with treatment outcome in a treatment focusing on the alliance as a core mechanism of change. These findings are consistent with theoretical conceptualizations of gains in alliance as products of the therapists identifying and resolving ruptures, and attest to the important role such a rupture resolution process is expected to play in Brief Relational Therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/ccp0000397
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212718525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2212718525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-40ccc9a78293fa9125946cf2833880dc17af02ac0d1ae973ff31c048b20870523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V1LHDEUBuBQKrpqb_oDSqA3xTL1JNlMkktdWhUEQW3pRSEcM2e6kdmZMZkR9t93lvUDeuG5CYc8vBx4Gfso4JsAZY5D6GEa5cw7NhNOuUIKYd6zGYCUBUD5e4_t53w_GVGC3mV7SgDYUpkZ-3MzVhW1_Axjm3ls-bAkftI0EdtAm33R_W3jEB-Jn9ISH2OXsOG3S0rYr_kvSnnM_DRFqvk1NTjErn39P2Q7NTaZPjy9B-znj--3i_Pi8ursYnFyWeBc6KGYQwjBobHSqRqdkNrNy1BLq5S1UAVhsAaJASqB5IyqayUCzO2dBGtAS3XAvmxz-9Q9jJQHv4o5UNNgS92YvZRCGmG11BP9_B-978Y03bxRGrQFNc2bSkhZOtBuUkdbFVKXc6La9ymuMK29AL9pxr82M-FPT5Hj3YqqF_pcxQS-bgH26Pu8DpiGGBrKYUyJ2mET5q3xpdcg1D-4ZZWp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2212269059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sudden Gains in the Alliance in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Brief Relational Therapy</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Zilcha-Mano, Sigal ; Eubanks, Catherine F ; Muran, J. Christopher</creator><contributor>Davila, Joanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zilcha-Mano, Sigal ; Eubanks, Catherine F ; Muran, J. Christopher ; Davila, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Two decades of empirical research suggest that changes in symptoms are not linear, and many patients gain much of their symptom reduction in one between-sessions interval. Theoretically, such gains are expected to be manifested in the working alliance as well, following a rupture session; however, no study to date has directly examined between-sessions sudden gains in the alliance. In the present study we examined whether ruptures predict subsequent sudden gains in the alliance, which in turn show an effect on outcome that is specific to the treatment in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change. Method: In a sample of 241 patient-therapist dyads, patients received either brief relational therapy (BRT), in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change, or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), in which it is not. We examined whether patient and therapist reports of ruptures predicted sudden gains in alliance in the subsequent session, and whether early sudden gains in alliance were significantly associated with treatment outcome in BRT versus CBT. Results: Rupture sessions, as reported by therapists but not by patients, predicted a sudden gain in both patient and therapist-reported alliance in the subsequent session. Findings revealed a moderating effect of treatment condition on the association between sudden gains and treatment outcome, in which gains in alliance were associated with better treatment outcome in BRT than in CBT. Conclusions: The findings support the potential role of gains in alliance as a specific mechanism of change in BRT versus CBT. What is the public health significance of this article? The findings suggest that for many patients much of the improvement in alliance occurs in a single between-sessions interval, following a session in which the therapist reported a rupture. Such alliance gains may show a specific association with treatment outcome in a treatment focusing on the alliance as a core mechanism of change. These findings are consistent with theoretical conceptualizations of gains in alliance as products of the therapists identifying and resolving ruptures, and attest to the important role such a rupture resolution process is expected to play in Brief Relational Therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-006X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000397</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31008637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Behavior change ; Behavior modification ; Brief Relational Therapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Cognitive Behavior Therapy ; Cognitive behavioral therapy ; Cognitive therapy ; Concept formation ; Female ; Human ; Male ; Patients ; Psychotherapeutic Breakthrough ; Therapeutic Alliance ; Therapeutic alliances ; Therapist patient relationships ; Therapists ; Therapy ; Treatment Outcomes</subject><ispartof>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019-06, Vol.87 (6), p.501-509</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-40ccc9a78293fa9125946cf2833880dc17af02ac0d1ae973ff31c048b20870523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Davila, Joanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zilcha-Mano, Sigal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eubanks, Catherine F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muran, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Sudden Gains in the Alliance in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Brief Relational Therapy</title><title>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective: Two decades of empirical research suggest that changes in symptoms are not linear, and many patients gain much of their symptom reduction in one between-sessions interval. Theoretically, such gains are expected to be manifested in the working alliance as well, following a rupture session; however, no study to date has directly examined between-sessions sudden gains in the alliance. In the present study we examined whether ruptures predict subsequent sudden gains in the alliance, which in turn show an effect on outcome that is specific to the treatment in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change. Method: In a sample of 241 patient-therapist dyads, patients received either brief relational therapy (BRT), in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change, or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), in which it is not. We examined whether patient and therapist reports of ruptures predicted sudden gains in alliance in the subsequent session, and whether early sudden gains in alliance were significantly associated with treatment outcome in BRT versus CBT. Results: Rupture sessions, as reported by therapists but not by patients, predicted a sudden gain in both patient and therapist-reported alliance in the subsequent session. Findings revealed a moderating effect of treatment condition on the association between sudden gains and treatment outcome, in which gains in alliance were associated with better treatment outcome in BRT than in CBT. Conclusions: The findings support the potential role of gains in alliance as a specific mechanism of change in BRT versus CBT. What is the public health significance of this article? The findings suggest that for many patients much of the improvement in alliance occurs in a single between-sessions interval, following a session in which the therapist reported a rupture. Such alliance gains may show a specific association with treatment outcome in a treatment focusing on the alliance as a core mechanism of change. These findings are consistent with theoretical conceptualizations of gains in alliance as products of the therapists identifying and resolving ruptures, and attest to the important role such a rupture resolution process is expected to play in Brief Relational Therapy.</description><subject>Behavior change</subject><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Brief Relational Therapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cognitive Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Cognitive behavioral therapy</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychotherapeutic Breakthrough</subject><subject>Therapeutic Alliance</subject><subject>Therapeutic alliances</subject><subject>Therapist patient relationships</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcomes</subject><issn>0022-006X</issn><issn>1939-2117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90V1LHDEUBuBQKrpqb_oDSqA3xTL1JNlMkktdWhUEQW3pRSEcM2e6kdmZMZkR9t93lvUDeuG5CYc8vBx4Gfso4JsAZY5D6GEa5cw7NhNOuUIKYd6zGYCUBUD5e4_t53w_GVGC3mV7SgDYUpkZ-3MzVhW1_Axjm3ls-bAkftI0EdtAm33R_W3jEB-Jn9ISH2OXsOG3S0rYr_kvSnnM_DRFqvk1NTjErn39P2Q7NTaZPjy9B-znj--3i_Pi8ursYnFyWeBc6KGYQwjBobHSqRqdkNrNy1BLq5S1UAVhsAaJASqB5IyqayUCzO2dBGtAS3XAvmxz-9Q9jJQHv4o5UNNgS92YvZRCGmG11BP9_B-978Y03bxRGrQFNc2bSkhZOtBuUkdbFVKXc6La9ymuMK29AL9pxr82M-FPT5Hj3YqqF_pcxQS-bgH26Pu8DpiGGBrKYUyJ2mET5q3xpdcg1D-4ZZWp</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Zilcha-Mano, Sigal</creator><creator>Eubanks, Catherine F</creator><creator>Muran, J. Christopher</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Sudden Gains in the Alliance in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Brief Relational Therapy</title><author>Zilcha-Mano, Sigal ; Eubanks, Catherine F ; Muran, J. Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-40ccc9a78293fa9125946cf2833880dc17af02ac0d1ae973ff31c048b20870523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavior change</topic><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Brief Relational Therapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cognitive Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Cognitive behavioral therapy</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychotherapeutic Breakthrough</topic><topic>Therapeutic Alliance</topic><topic>Therapeutic alliances</topic><topic>Therapist patient relationships</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zilcha-Mano, Sigal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eubanks, Catherine F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muran, J. Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zilcha-Mano, Sigal</au><au>Eubanks, Catherine F</au><au>Muran, J. Christopher</au><au>Davila, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sudden Gains in the Alliance in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Brief Relational Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>501-509</pages><issn>0022-006X</issn><eissn>1939-2117</eissn><abstract>Objective: Two decades of empirical research suggest that changes in symptoms are not linear, and many patients gain much of their symptom reduction in one between-sessions interval. Theoretically, such gains are expected to be manifested in the working alliance as well, following a rupture session; however, no study to date has directly examined between-sessions sudden gains in the alliance. In the present study we examined whether ruptures predict subsequent sudden gains in the alliance, which in turn show an effect on outcome that is specific to the treatment in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change. Method: In a sample of 241 patient-therapist dyads, patients received either brief relational therapy (BRT), in which the alliance is conceptualized as an active mechanism of change, or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), in which it is not. We examined whether patient and therapist reports of ruptures predicted sudden gains in alliance in the subsequent session, and whether early sudden gains in alliance were significantly associated with treatment outcome in BRT versus CBT. Results: Rupture sessions, as reported by therapists but not by patients, predicted a sudden gain in both patient and therapist-reported alliance in the subsequent session. Findings revealed a moderating effect of treatment condition on the association between sudden gains and treatment outcome, in which gains in alliance were associated with better treatment outcome in BRT than in CBT. Conclusions: The findings support the potential role of gains in alliance as a specific mechanism of change in BRT versus CBT. What is the public health significance of this article? The findings suggest that for many patients much of the improvement in alliance occurs in a single between-sessions interval, following a session in which the therapist reported a rupture. Such alliance gains may show a specific association with treatment outcome in a treatment focusing on the alliance as a core mechanism of change. These findings are consistent with theoretical conceptualizations of gains in alliance as products of the therapists identifying and resolving ruptures, and attest to the important role such a rupture resolution process is expected to play in Brief Relational Therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31008637</pmid><doi>10.1037/ccp0000397</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-006X
ispartof Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019-06, Vol.87 (6), p.501-509
issn 0022-006X
1939-2117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212718525
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PsycARTICLES
subjects Behavior change
Behavior modification
Brief Relational Therapy
Clinical outcomes
Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive therapy
Concept formation
Female
Human
Male
Patients
Psychotherapeutic Breakthrough
Therapeutic Alliance
Therapeutic alliances
Therapist patient relationships
Therapists
Therapy
Treatment Outcomes
title Sudden Gains in the Alliance in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Brief Relational Therapy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sudden%20Gains%20in%20the%20Alliance%20in%20Cognitive%20Behavioral%20Therapy%20Versus%20Brief%20Relational%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consulting%20and%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Zilcha-Mano,%20Sigal&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=501-509&rft.issn=0022-006X&rft.eissn=1939-2117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/ccp0000397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2212718525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-40ccc9a78293fa9125946cf2833880dc17af02ac0d1ae973ff31c048b20870523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2212269059&rft_id=info:pmid/31008637&rfr_iscdi=true