Loading…

Instrumented Version of the Modified Dynamic Gait Index in Patients With Neurologic Disorders

Background Gait instability is common in adults with neurologic disorders and the modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI) was recently introduced to assess dynamic balance. However, instrumental assessment is needed to provide quantitative measures. Objective To develop and validate an instrumented versi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PM & R 2019-12, Vol.11 (12), p.1312-1319
Main Authors: Anastasi, Denise, Carpinella, Ilaria, Gervasoni, Elisa, Matsuda, Patricia N., Bovi, Gabriele, Ferrarin, Maurizio, Cattaneo, Davide
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Gait instability is common in adults with neurologic disorders and the modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI) was recently introduced to assess dynamic balance. However, instrumental assessment is needed to provide quantitative measures. Objective To develop and validate an instrumented version of the mDGI. Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting Clinical setting. Participants Thirty adults with neurologic disorders (10 with multiple sclerosis, 10 with Parkinson disease, and 10 with stroke) and 20 healthy volunteers. Methods Participants were assessed with the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and with the mDGI. During the assessment of mDGI, data were collected by a single Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) positioned on the sternum. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the instrumented data extracting eight PC scores (ImPC) describing dynamic balance. The instrumented overall score (ImDGI) was then calculated as the sum of the mPCs. PCA revealed two components associated with stride features and regularity (ImDGI_Gait_Pattern) and trunk movements (ImDGI_Trunk_Sway). Spearman coefficients were calculated between mDGI and ImDGI, whereas Mann‐Whitney (U) and Kruskal‐Wallis (H) tests assessed differences between groups and neurologic conditions. Main Outcome Measurements ImDGI. Results ImDGI did not show ceiling effects, and good correlations were found between ImDGI and mDGI (r = .84), and TUG (r = .84) for people with neurologic disorders (P 
ISSN:1934-1482
1934-1563
DOI:10.1002/pmrj.12137