Socially Assigned Race and Diabetes: Findings from the Arizona Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013–2014

• Published in: Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities 2019-10, Vol.6 (5), p.926-934
• Main Authors: Lawrence, Jourdyn A., White, Kellee, Cummings, Jason L., Hardin, James W., Torres, Myriam E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agreements; Assignment; Classification; Cross-sectional studies; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent); Epidemiology; Ethnic factors; Ethnicity; Health disparities; Health research; Health services; Health services utilization; Health status; Hispanic Americans; Inequality; Insight; Law enforcement; Medical diagnosis; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Minority & ethnic groups; Native North Americans; ORIGINAL PAPERS; Pacific Islander people; Quality of Life Research; Race; Racial discrimination; Racial stratification; Regression analysis; Regression models; Risk behavior; Risk factors; Risk taking; Social Inequality; Social Structure; Sociodemographics; Statistical analysis; Stratification; Surveillance; Surveillance systems; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; White people
• ISSN: 2197-3792; 2196-8837
• DOI: 10.1007/s40615-019-00593-w

Socially assigned race, the racial/ethnic categorization of individuals by others, may serve as the basis for differential or unfair treatment. Latinxs are commonly socially assigned to a race/ethnicity with which they do not self-identify. However, it is unclear the degree to which self-identified Latinxs who are socially assigned as white or Latinx may differentially predict health outcomes beyond general health status and healthcare utilization. We examine the association between socially assigned race and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Data from the Arizona’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2013, 2014) was used in a cross-sectional analysis (restricted to Latinxs and non-Hispanic whites; N = 8370) to examine the association between self-identified (SI) and socially assigned (SA) race/ethnicity agreement and T2DM. Latinxs were categorized according to SI-SA race/ethnicity agreement: discordant (SI-SA, different) and concordant (SI-SA, same). T2DM was based on self-reported physician diagnosis. Data were analyzed using Poisson regression models to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Latinxs comprised 28.5% of our sample, of which, 18.5% was discordant and 81.5% was concordant. In fully adjusted models, concordant Latinxs were more likely to have T2DM than whites (aPR 2.01, 95% CI 1.44, 2.82). There were no significant differences in T2DM between discordant Latinxs and whites. Our results suggest that socially assigned race is an understudied determinant of health and may further understanding of the impact of racial stratification on Latinx health inequities. Additional research examining socially assigned race and other health outcomes are warranted to gain further insight of the biological impact of racialized lived experiences.