Loading…
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer
The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes in patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer of the uterus treated with either laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent between 2011 and 2017 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of University Hosp...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anticancer research 2019-05, Vol.39 (5), p.2661-2664 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-83570a8573913e76c494cb7ddc361218e3941785a829c7088a163ce3e19f47863 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 2664 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2661 |
container_title | Anticancer research |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Ratiu, Dominik Luncescu, Christian Morgenstern, Bernd Eichler, Christian Grüttner, Berthold Ludwig, Sebastian Mallmann, Peter Thangarajah, Fabinshy |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes in patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer of the uterus treated with either laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent between 2011 and 2017 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of University Hospital Cologne.
This retrospective analysis included all patients who received surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2017 for stages IA1 to IIB cervical carcinoma. Patients receiving primary or secondary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also included.
In total, 75 patients were included, of whom 34 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and 41 underwent open surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 10 patients in the minimally-invasive group and in 14 patients in the laparotomy group. Statistically, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in both groups. Disease-free survival showed a significant difference in favor of the minimally invasive group.
Minimally invasive surgical therapy for cervical cancer improves disease-free-survival. Prospective trials are needed to further confirm these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21873/anticanres.13390 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232024262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232024262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-83570a8573913e76c494cb7ddc361218e3941785a829c7088a163ce3e19f47863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1LwzAYhYMobk5_gDeSS286k7xtPi5H8WMwUVDxsqRpNiNtOpN2sH9v2ea8euFwzuE9D0LXlEwZlQLutO-c0T7YOKUAipygMRWKJiIDcorGhGUkEYRkI3QR4zchnCsJ52gElCiW8myMyrxt1jq42HrcLvGz867Rdb3Fc7_R0W0sfuvDyoYt1r7Cs7JqG-d1fVRnTetX-FV3zvou4k_XfeHchs3wVo1z7Y0Nl-hsqetorw53gj4e7t_zp2Tx8jjPZ4vEQJp2iYRMEC0zAYqCFdykKjWlqCoDnA5zLaiUCplpyZQRREpNORgLlqplKiSHCbrd965D-9Pb2BWNi8bWtfa27WPBGDDCUsbZYKV7qwltjMEui3UYdodtQUmxQ1v8oy12aIfMzaG-LxtbHRN_LOEXtVd2tA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232024262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Ratiu, Dominik ; Luncescu, Christian ; Morgenstern, Bernd ; Eichler, Christian ; Grüttner, Berthold ; Ludwig, Sebastian ; Mallmann, Peter ; Thangarajah, Fabinshy</creator><creatorcontrib>Ratiu, Dominik ; Luncescu, Christian ; Morgenstern, Bernd ; Eichler, Christian ; Grüttner, Berthold ; Ludwig, Sebastian ; Mallmann, Peter ; Thangarajah, Fabinshy</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes in patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer of the uterus treated with either laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent between 2011 and 2017 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of University Hospital Cologne.
This retrospective analysis included all patients who received surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2017 for stages IA1 to IIB cervical carcinoma. Patients receiving primary or secondary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also included.
In total, 75 patients were included, of whom 34 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and 41 underwent open surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 10 patients in the minimally-invasive group and in 14 patients in the laparotomy group. Statistically, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in both groups. Disease-free survival showed a significant difference in favor of the minimally invasive group.
Minimally invasive surgical therapy for cervical cancer improves disease-free-survival. Prospective trials are needed to further confirm these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-7005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7530</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13390</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31092465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Laparotomy ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Anticancer research, 2019-05, Vol.39 (5), p.2661-2664</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-83570a8573913e76c494cb7ddc361218e3941785a829c7088a163ce3e19f47863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ratiu, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luncescu, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgenstern, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grüttner, Berthold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallmann, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thangarajah, Fabinshy</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer</title><title>Anticancer research</title><addtitle>Anticancer Res</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes in patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer of the uterus treated with either laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent between 2011 and 2017 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of University Hospital Cologne.
This retrospective analysis included all patients who received surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2017 for stages IA1 to IIB cervical carcinoma. Patients receiving primary or secondary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also included.
In total, 75 patients were included, of whom 34 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and 41 underwent open surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 10 patients in the minimally-invasive group and in 14 patients in the laparotomy group. Statistically, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in both groups. Disease-free survival showed a significant difference in favor of the minimally invasive group.
Minimally invasive surgical therapy for cervical cancer improves disease-free-survival. Prospective trials are needed to further confirm these results.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0250-7005</issn><issn>1791-7530</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF1LwzAYhYMobk5_gDeSS286k7xtPi5H8WMwUVDxsqRpNiNtOpN2sH9v2ea8euFwzuE9D0LXlEwZlQLutO-c0T7YOKUAipygMRWKJiIDcorGhGUkEYRkI3QR4zchnCsJ52gElCiW8myMyrxt1jq42HrcLvGz867Rdb3Fc7_R0W0sfuvDyoYt1r7Cs7JqG-d1fVRnTetX-FV3zvou4k_XfeHchs3wVo1z7Y0Nl-hsqetorw53gj4e7t_zp2Tx8jjPZ4vEQJp2iYRMEC0zAYqCFdykKjWlqCoDnA5zLaiUCplpyZQRREpNORgLlqplKiSHCbrd965D-9Pb2BWNi8bWtfa27WPBGDDCUsbZYKV7qwltjMEui3UYdodtQUmxQ1v8oy12aIfMzaG-LxtbHRN_LOEXtVd2tA</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Ratiu, Dominik</creator><creator>Luncescu, Christian</creator><creator>Morgenstern, Bernd</creator><creator>Eichler, Christian</creator><creator>Grüttner, Berthold</creator><creator>Ludwig, Sebastian</creator><creator>Mallmann, Peter</creator><creator>Thangarajah, Fabinshy</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer</title><author>Ratiu, Dominik ; Luncescu, Christian ; Morgenstern, Bernd ; Eichler, Christian ; Grüttner, Berthold ; Ludwig, Sebastian ; Mallmann, Peter ; Thangarajah, Fabinshy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-83570a8573913e76c494cb7ddc361218e3941785a829c7088a163ce3e19f47863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ratiu, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luncescu, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgenstern, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grüttner, Berthold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallmann, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thangarajah, Fabinshy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anticancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ratiu, Dominik</au><au>Luncescu, Christian</au><au>Morgenstern, Bernd</au><au>Eichler, Christian</au><au>Grüttner, Berthold</au><au>Ludwig, Sebastian</au><au>Mallmann, Peter</au><au>Thangarajah, Fabinshy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Anticancer research</jtitle><addtitle>Anticancer Res</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2661</spage><epage>2664</epage><pages>2661-2664</pages><issn>0250-7005</issn><eissn>1791-7530</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes in patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer of the uterus treated with either laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent between 2011 and 2017 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of University Hospital Cologne.
This retrospective analysis included all patients who received surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2017 for stages IA1 to IIB cervical carcinoma. Patients receiving primary or secondary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also included.
In total, 75 patients were included, of whom 34 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and 41 underwent open surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 10 patients in the minimally-invasive group and in 14 patients in the laparotomy group. Statistically, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in both groups. Disease-free survival showed a significant difference in favor of the minimally invasive group.
Minimally invasive surgical therapy for cervical cancer improves disease-free-survival. Prospective trials are needed to further confirm these results.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pmid>31092465</pmid><doi>10.21873/anticanres.13390</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0250-7005 |
ispartof | Anticancer research, 2019-05, Vol.39 (5), p.2661-2664 |
issn | 0250-7005 1791-7530 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232024262 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Adult Aged Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Hysterectomy Laparotomy Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery Neoplasm Staging Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery |
title | Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Abdominal Surgery Among Patients With Cervical Cancer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Surgery%20and%20Abdominal%20Surgery%20Among%20Patients%20With%20Cervical%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Anticancer%20research&rft.au=Ratiu,%20Dominik&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2661&rft.epage=2664&rft.pages=2661-2664&rft.issn=0250-7005&rft.eissn=1791-7530&rft_id=info:doi/10.21873/anticanres.13390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232024262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-83570a8573913e76c494cb7ddc361218e3941785a829c7088a163ce3e19f47863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232024262&rft_id=info:pmid/31092465&rfr_iscdi=true |