Loading…

Factors influencing selection of an interventional radiology training program

To understand factors influencing the choice and ranking of Interventional Radiology (IR) training programs among a cohort of medical students and diagnostic radiology residents pursuing careers in IR. An IRB approved, 34 question online survey (surveymonkey.com) evaluated the impact of twenty-two d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical imaging 2019-09, Vol.57, p.30-34
Main Authors: Ramaswamy, Raja S., Fung, Daniel, Tiwari, Tatulya, Foltz, Gretchen, Akinwande, Olaguoke, Mokkarala, Mahati, Kim, Seung, Malone, Christopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To understand factors influencing the choice and ranking of Interventional Radiology (IR) training programs among a cohort of medical students and diagnostic radiology residents pursuing careers in IR. An IRB approved, 34 question online survey (surveymonkey.com) evaluated the impact of twenty-two different factors and demographics on IR training program selection for medical students and residents. The factors analyzed included programmatic features, location characteristics, academic reputation, program size, benefits/financial incentives, emphasis on clinical care, and future job opportunities. Comparison of Likert scale responses between medical students and residents were performed by using unpaired two-sample t-tests. 181 (145 male, 35 female) individuals responded to the survey, 74 medical students (40.9%) and 107 residents (59.1%). Medical students and residents both selected variety of IR cases as the most important and highest rated factor when choosing an IR program. Medical students ranked availability of a mentor (p = .03), inpatient consultation service (p = .003), outpatient clinic experience (p = .003), and ICU rotation experience (p 
ISSN:0899-7071
1873-4499
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.05.001