Loading…
A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device
To compare the expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion by intrauterine device (IUD) type. This prospective cohort included participants with a postplacental IUD inserted after vaginal or cesarean delivery, aged 18–45 and ≥24 weeks’ gestation. Study enrollment took place after IUD se...
Saved in:
Published in: | Contraception (Stoneham) 2019-08, Vol.100 (2), p.101-105 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b27b1e7e9e6da914ee58513919cae4096de9b5633d856829764341a1a566c9823 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b27b1e7e9e6da914ee58513919cae4096de9b5633d856829764341a1a566c9823 |
container_end_page | 105 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Contraception (Stoneham) |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Hinz, Erica K. Murthy, Amitasrigowri Wang, Binhuan Ryan, Nessa Ades, Veronica |
description | To compare the expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion by intrauterine device (IUD) type.
This prospective cohort included participants with a postplacental IUD inserted after vaginal or cesarean delivery, aged 18–45 and ≥24 weeks’ gestation. Study enrollment took place after IUD selection and insertion. Participants returned for a postpartum visit and received a short message service survey regarding IUD expulsion, removal, vaginal bleeding and breastfeeding weekly from weeks 0 to 5 and on weeks 12 and 24 postpartum. Multivariable logistic regression examined 6-month expulsion rate by IUD type adjusting for variables that differed between the groups at baseline and in the bivariate analyses.
Of 114 participants, 75 (65.8%) chose a levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD and 39 (34.2%) chose a copper IUD; 58 (50.9%) had a vaginal delivery, and 56 (49.1%) had a cesarean delivery. Groups were similar except that copper IUD users had a higher median parity (3 vs. 2, p=.03) and a higher proportion of senior residents compared to junior residents had performed insertion (46.2% vs. 22.7%, p=.02). The expulsion rate at 6 months was similar between the levonorgestrel and copper groups (26.7% and 20.5%, respectively; p=.38). Multivariable logistic regression also demonstrated that the odds of expulsion did not differ by IUD type (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.22–4.48).
The expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion did not differ between the levonorgestrel and copper IUD type.
Prior studies demonstrate a wide range of expulsion after postplacental insertion, and recent data suggest a higher expulsion rate for the levonorgestrel compared to the copper intrauterine device. However, many studies did not control for patient-level factors or delivery route. We found that when controlling for these confounding variables, the expulsion rate at 6 months postpartum did not differ by intrauterine device type. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232093308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010782419301519</els_id><sourcerecordid>2232093308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b27b1e7e9e6da914ee58513919cae4096de9b5633d856829764341a1a566c9823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctuFDEQtBCILIFfQJa4cJmhezwPG05RlABSJC5wtrye3sSr2bGxPaPkB_huvNmAxI1Tq9VVXdVdjL1DqBGw_7CvrZ9zNJZCdn6uG0BVQ1sD4jO2QTmoCjqUz9kGAKEaZNOesVcp7QFgUN3wkp0JRJDQiQ37dcFD9CmQzW4lbv2dj5mnvIwPpTkEE918y-k-LFMqYtzsMkUefMphKg7mbCbu5kTxaOUjz3fEJ1r97OMtpRxp4ivFtKTHifUhFLY7ul_KHjcTH2l1ll6zFzszJXrzVM_Zj-ur75dfqptvn79eXtxUVkiRq20zbJEGUtSPRmFL1MkOhUJlDbWg-pHUtuuFGGXXy0YNfStaNGi6vrdKNuKcvT_tLUf_XIpDfXDJ0jSZmfySdNOIBpQQIAv00wlqy39SpJ0O0R1MfNAI-hiE3ut_gtDHIDS0ugRR2G-fhJbtgca_3D-fL4CrE4DKuaujqJN1NFsaXSxh6NG7_xL6DW6CpaE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232093308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hinz, Erica K. ; Murthy, Amitasrigowri ; Wang, Binhuan ; Ryan, Nessa ; Ades, Veronica</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Erica K. ; Murthy, Amitasrigowri ; Wang, Binhuan ; Ryan, Nessa ; Ades, Veronica</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion by intrauterine device (IUD) type.
This prospective cohort included participants with a postplacental IUD inserted after vaginal or cesarean delivery, aged 18–45 and ≥24 weeks’ gestation. Study enrollment took place after IUD selection and insertion. Participants returned for a postpartum visit and received a short message service survey regarding IUD expulsion, removal, vaginal bleeding and breastfeeding weekly from weeks 0 to 5 and on weeks 12 and 24 postpartum. Multivariable logistic regression examined 6-month expulsion rate by IUD type adjusting for variables that differed between the groups at baseline and in the bivariate analyses.
Of 114 participants, 75 (65.8%) chose a levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD and 39 (34.2%) chose a copper IUD; 58 (50.9%) had a vaginal delivery, and 56 (49.1%) had a cesarean delivery. Groups were similar except that copper IUD users had a higher median parity (3 vs. 2, p=.03) and a higher proportion of senior residents compared to junior residents had performed insertion (46.2% vs. 22.7%, p=.02). The expulsion rate at 6 months was similar between the levonorgestrel and copper groups (26.7% and 20.5%, respectively; p=.38). Multivariable logistic regression also demonstrated that the odds of expulsion did not differ by IUD type (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.22–4.48).
The expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion did not differ between the levonorgestrel and copper IUD type.
Prior studies demonstrate a wide range of expulsion after postplacental insertion, and recent data suggest a higher expulsion rate for the levonorgestrel compared to the copper intrauterine device. However, many studies did not control for patient-level factors or delivery route. We found that when controlling for these confounding variables, the expulsion rate at 6 months postpartum did not differ by intrauterine device type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7824</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31108053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Copper (Cu) ; Expulsion ; Intrauterine device (IUD) ; Levonorgestrel (LNG) ; Postplacental ; Short message service (SMS)</subject><ispartof>Contraception (Stoneham), 2019-08, Vol.100 (2), p.101-105</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b27b1e7e9e6da914ee58513919cae4096de9b5633d856829764341a1a566c9823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b27b1e7e9e6da914ee58513919cae4096de9b5633d856829764341a1a566c9823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31108053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Erica K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Amitasrigowri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Binhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Nessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ades, Veronica</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device</title><title>Contraception (Stoneham)</title><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><description>To compare the expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion by intrauterine device (IUD) type.
This prospective cohort included participants with a postplacental IUD inserted after vaginal or cesarean delivery, aged 18–45 and ≥24 weeks’ gestation. Study enrollment took place after IUD selection and insertion. Participants returned for a postpartum visit and received a short message service survey regarding IUD expulsion, removal, vaginal bleeding and breastfeeding weekly from weeks 0 to 5 and on weeks 12 and 24 postpartum. Multivariable logistic regression examined 6-month expulsion rate by IUD type adjusting for variables that differed between the groups at baseline and in the bivariate analyses.
Of 114 participants, 75 (65.8%) chose a levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD and 39 (34.2%) chose a copper IUD; 58 (50.9%) had a vaginal delivery, and 56 (49.1%) had a cesarean delivery. Groups were similar except that copper IUD users had a higher median parity (3 vs. 2, p=.03) and a higher proportion of senior residents compared to junior residents had performed insertion (46.2% vs. 22.7%, p=.02). The expulsion rate at 6 months was similar between the levonorgestrel and copper groups (26.7% and 20.5%, respectively; p=.38). Multivariable logistic regression also demonstrated that the odds of expulsion did not differ by IUD type (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.22–4.48).
The expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion did not differ between the levonorgestrel and copper IUD type.
Prior studies demonstrate a wide range of expulsion after postplacental insertion, and recent data suggest a higher expulsion rate for the levonorgestrel compared to the copper intrauterine device. However, many studies did not control for patient-level factors or delivery route. We found that when controlling for these confounding variables, the expulsion rate at 6 months postpartum did not differ by intrauterine device type.</description><subject>Copper (Cu)</subject><subject>Expulsion</subject><subject>Intrauterine device (IUD)</subject><subject>Levonorgestrel (LNG)</subject><subject>Postplacental</subject><subject>Short message service (SMS)</subject><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUctuFDEQtBCILIFfQJa4cJmhezwPG05RlABSJC5wtrye3sSr2bGxPaPkB_huvNmAxI1Tq9VVXdVdjL1DqBGw_7CvrZ9zNJZCdn6uG0BVQ1sD4jO2QTmoCjqUz9kGAKEaZNOesVcp7QFgUN3wkp0JRJDQiQ37dcFD9CmQzW4lbv2dj5mnvIwPpTkEE918y-k-LFMqYtzsMkUefMphKg7mbCbu5kTxaOUjz3fEJ1r97OMtpRxp4ivFtKTHifUhFLY7ul_KHjcTH2l1ll6zFzszJXrzVM_Zj-ur75dfqptvn79eXtxUVkiRq20zbJEGUtSPRmFL1MkOhUJlDbWg-pHUtuuFGGXXy0YNfStaNGi6vrdKNuKcvT_tLUf_XIpDfXDJ0jSZmfySdNOIBpQQIAv00wlqy39SpJ0O0R1MfNAI-hiE3ut_gtDHIDS0ugRR2G-fhJbtgca_3D-fL4CrE4DKuaujqJN1NFsaXSxh6NG7_xL6DW6CpaE</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Hinz, Erica K.</creator><creator>Murthy, Amitasrigowri</creator><creator>Wang, Binhuan</creator><creator>Ryan, Nessa</creator><creator>Ades, Veronica</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device</title><author>Hinz, Erica K. ; Murthy, Amitasrigowri ; Wang, Binhuan ; Ryan, Nessa ; Ades, Veronica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b27b1e7e9e6da914ee58513919cae4096de9b5633d856829764341a1a566c9823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Copper (Cu)</topic><topic>Expulsion</topic><topic>Intrauterine device (IUD)</topic><topic>Levonorgestrel (LNG)</topic><topic>Postplacental</topic><topic>Short message service (SMS)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Erica K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Amitasrigowri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Binhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Nessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ades, Veronica</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinz, Erica K.</au><au>Murthy, Amitasrigowri</au><au>Wang, Binhuan</au><au>Ryan, Nessa</au><au>Ades, Veronica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device</atitle><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>101-105</pages><issn>0010-7824</issn><eissn>1879-0518</eissn><abstract>To compare the expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion by intrauterine device (IUD) type.
This prospective cohort included participants with a postplacental IUD inserted after vaginal or cesarean delivery, aged 18–45 and ≥24 weeks’ gestation. Study enrollment took place after IUD selection and insertion. Participants returned for a postpartum visit and received a short message service survey regarding IUD expulsion, removal, vaginal bleeding and breastfeeding weekly from weeks 0 to 5 and on weeks 12 and 24 postpartum. Multivariable logistic regression examined 6-month expulsion rate by IUD type adjusting for variables that differed between the groups at baseline and in the bivariate analyses.
Of 114 participants, 75 (65.8%) chose a levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD and 39 (34.2%) chose a copper IUD; 58 (50.9%) had a vaginal delivery, and 56 (49.1%) had a cesarean delivery. Groups were similar except that copper IUD users had a higher median parity (3 vs. 2, p=.03) and a higher proportion of senior residents compared to junior residents had performed insertion (46.2% vs. 22.7%, p=.02). The expulsion rate at 6 months was similar between the levonorgestrel and copper groups (26.7% and 20.5%, respectively; p=.38). Multivariable logistic regression also demonstrated that the odds of expulsion did not differ by IUD type (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.22–4.48).
The expulsion rate at 6 months after postplacental insertion did not differ between the levonorgestrel and copper IUD type.
Prior studies demonstrate a wide range of expulsion after postplacental insertion, and recent data suggest a higher expulsion rate for the levonorgestrel compared to the copper intrauterine device. However, many studies did not control for patient-level factors or delivery route. We found that when controlling for these confounding variables, the expulsion rate at 6 months postpartum did not differ by intrauterine device type.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31108053</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-7824 |
ispartof | Contraception (Stoneham), 2019-08, Vol.100 (2), p.101-105 |
issn | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232093308 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Copper (Cu) Expulsion Intrauterine device (IUD) Levonorgestrel (LNG) Postplacental Short message service (SMS) |
title | A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A14%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20cohort%20study%20comparing%20expulsion%20after%20postplacental%20insertion:%20the%20levonorgestrel%20versus%20the%20copper%20intrauterine%20device&rft.jtitle=Contraception%20(Stoneham)&rft.au=Hinz,%20Erica%20K.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=101-105&rft.issn=0010-7824&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232093308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b27b1e7e9e6da914ee58513919cae4096de9b5633d856829764341a1a566c9823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232093308&rft_id=info:pmid/31108053&rfr_iscdi=true |