Two‐dimensional strain echocardiography‐derived left ventricular ejection fraction, volumes, and global systolic dyssynchrony index: Comparison with three‐dimensional echocardiography

Background Three‐dimensional (3D) echocardiography is the most accurate echocardiographic method for ventricular chamber quantification. It is unclear how two‐dimensional (2D) techniques perform against 3D technology and whether 2D methods can be extrapolated to obtain 3D data. Methods Retrospective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1054-1065
Main Authors: Vaidya, Gaurang Nandkishor, Salgado, Benjamin C., Badar, Faraz, John, Anub, Stoddard, Marcus F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
biplane
Echocardiography - methods
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods
ejection fraction
Female
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
strain
three‐dimensional echocardiography
two‐dimensional echocardiography
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
ventricular synchrony
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Three‐dimensional (3D) echocardiography is the most accurate echocardiographic method for ventricular chamber quantification. It is unclear how two‐dimensional (2D) techniques perform against 3D technology and whether 2D methods can be extrapolated to obtain 3D data. Methods Retrospective review of transthoracic echocardiography was performed, with comparison of ejection fraction (EF), end‐diastolic volume (EDV), end‐systolic volume (ESV), and 2D strain‐derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) and synchrony index. Results One‐hundred patients were identified. Using 3D echocardiography as reference standard, good correlation was noted with 2D strain‐derived EF (r = 0.89, P 
ISSN:0742-2822
1540-8175
DOI:10.1111/echo.14362