Loading…
Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve range of motion and modulate pain perception in healthy individuals?
•c-tDCS over motor cortex and a-tDCS over prefrontal cortex increases Hip ROM.•Only this montage reduced pain perception.•Inverted polarity reduced Hip ROM with no alterations in pain perception. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of different electrode assemblies and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuroscience letters 2019-08, Vol.707, p.134311-134311, Article 134311 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f48a516edb4650695af6d19933ff6f38ad785ae7156f593e5ae296b6094eec293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f48a516edb4650695af6d19933ff6f38ad785ae7156f593e5ae296b6094eec293 |
container_end_page | 134311 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 134311 |
container_title | Neuroscience letters |
container_volume | 707 |
creator | Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias Lattari, Eduardo Torres, Gabriela Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques Machado, Sérgio |
description | •c-tDCS over motor cortex and a-tDCS over prefrontal cortex increases Hip ROM.•Only this montage reduced pain perception.•Inverted polarity reduced Hip ROM with no alterations in pain perception.
The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of different electrode assemblies and electric current polarity on the ROM of the hip and pain perception. Ten healthy male, sedentary, right-leg-dominant, and aged between 19 and 30 years (24.0 ± 4.0 years) subjects were recruited. For the experimental conditions, the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was performed with the following montages. In the montage 1, the cathodal electrode was placed over the motor cortex (MC) horizontally, and the anodal electrode was positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In the montage 2, the anodal electrode was placed over the MC bilaterally, and the cathode electrode was positioned over the left DLPFC. The sham montage was the same as the montage 1. In the montage 1 and 2 stimulation was applied with 2 mA current intensity for 20 min. In the Sham condition, the stimulator was turned off after 30 s of active stimulation and the electrodes remained on the participants for 20 min. Before and after experimental conditions (Pre-stimulation, Post-stimulation), the maximum Hip ROM and pain perception was measured. For the Montage 1, the maximum Hip ROM increased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation, and in the Montage 2, the maximum Hip ROM decreased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. The pain perception in the Montage 1 decreased in the post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. In the post-stimulation, pain perception for the Montage 1 was lower compared to Montage 2 (p = 0.005), and sham (p = 0.004). When the anodic stimulus was applied on the left DLPFC and the cathodic stimulus on the motor cortex, an increase in ROM and a reduction in the pain perception was observed. This montage may to modulate pain perception and joint flexibility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134311 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2235063426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304394019303854</els_id><sourcerecordid>2235063426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f48a516edb4650695af6d19933ff6f38ad785ae7156f593e5ae296b6094eec293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2PFCEQhonRuOPqPzCGo5ce-e7mojETdTfZxIueCQOFy6SbboGeuP9exl49eqEq5Hmr4EHoNSV7Sqh6d9onWEeoe0ao3lMuOKVP0I4OPet63bOnaEc4ER3XglyhF6WcCCGSSvEcXTVUDoLzHfp1sAnXbFNx7Yh2xD5mcBW7NWdIFZcap3W0Nc4Jx2nJ8xlwI38AngOe5j_3NvnW-gsGeLEx4QWyg2ULJXwPdqz3D6318Rz9asfy4SV6FlqFV4_1Gn3__Onb4aa7-_rl9vDxrnNcsdoFMVhJFfijUJIoLW1QnmrNeQgq8MH6fpAWeipVkJpD65lWR0W0AHBM82v0dpvbnv5zhVLNFIuDcbQJ5rUYxnibywVTDRUb6vJcSoZglhwnmx8MJebi3JzM5txcnJvNeYu9edywHifw_0J_JTfg_QZA--c5QjbFRUgONtXGz_H_G34DcauW2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2235063426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve range of motion and modulate pain perception in healthy individuals?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias ; Lattari, Eduardo ; Torres, Gabriela ; Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes ; Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho ; Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão ; Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques ; Machado, Sérgio</creator><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias ; Lattari, Eduardo ; Torres, Gabriela ; Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes ; Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho ; Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão ; Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques ; Machado, Sérgio</creatorcontrib><description>•c-tDCS over motor cortex and a-tDCS over prefrontal cortex increases Hip ROM.•Only this montage reduced pain perception.•Inverted polarity reduced Hip ROM with no alterations in pain perception.
The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of different electrode assemblies and electric current polarity on the ROM of the hip and pain perception. Ten healthy male, sedentary, right-leg-dominant, and aged between 19 and 30 years (24.0 ± 4.0 years) subjects were recruited. For the experimental conditions, the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was performed with the following montages. In the montage 1, the cathodal electrode was placed over the motor cortex (MC) horizontally, and the anodal electrode was positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In the montage 2, the anodal electrode was placed over the MC bilaterally, and the cathode electrode was positioned over the left DLPFC. The sham montage was the same as the montage 1. In the montage 1 and 2 stimulation was applied with 2 mA current intensity for 20 min. In the Sham condition, the stimulator was turned off after 30 s of active stimulation and the electrodes remained on the participants for 20 min. Before and after experimental conditions (Pre-stimulation, Post-stimulation), the maximum Hip ROM and pain perception was measured. For the Montage 1, the maximum Hip ROM increased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation, and in the Montage 2, the maximum Hip ROM decreased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. The pain perception in the Montage 1 decreased in the post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. In the post-stimulation, pain perception for the Montage 1 was lower compared to Montage 2 (p = 0.005), and sham (p = 0.004). When the anodic stimulus was applied on the left DLPFC and the cathodic stimulus on the motor cortex, an increase in ROM and a reduction in the pain perception was observed. This montage may to modulate pain perception and joint flexibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31158433</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anodal stimulation tDCS ; Cathodal stimulation tDCS ; Electrodes ; Humans ; Joint flexibility ; Joints - physiopathology ; Motor Cortex - physiopathology ; Pain ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Pain Perception ; Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience letters, 2019-08, Vol.707, p.134311-134311, Article 134311</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f48a516edb4650695af6d19933ff6f38ad785ae7156f593e5ae296b6094eec293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f48a516edb4650695af6d19933ff6f38ad785ae7156f593e5ae296b6094eec293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5918-7218</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31158433$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattari, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Sérgio</creatorcontrib><title>Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve range of motion and modulate pain perception in healthy individuals?</title><title>Neuroscience letters</title><addtitle>Neurosci Lett</addtitle><description>•c-tDCS over motor cortex and a-tDCS over prefrontal cortex increases Hip ROM.•Only this montage reduced pain perception.•Inverted polarity reduced Hip ROM with no alterations in pain perception.
The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of different electrode assemblies and electric current polarity on the ROM of the hip and pain perception. Ten healthy male, sedentary, right-leg-dominant, and aged between 19 and 30 years (24.0 ± 4.0 years) subjects were recruited. For the experimental conditions, the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was performed with the following montages. In the montage 1, the cathodal electrode was placed over the motor cortex (MC) horizontally, and the anodal electrode was positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In the montage 2, the anodal electrode was placed over the MC bilaterally, and the cathode electrode was positioned over the left DLPFC. The sham montage was the same as the montage 1. In the montage 1 and 2 stimulation was applied with 2 mA current intensity for 20 min. In the Sham condition, the stimulator was turned off after 30 s of active stimulation and the electrodes remained on the participants for 20 min. Before and after experimental conditions (Pre-stimulation, Post-stimulation), the maximum Hip ROM and pain perception was measured. For the Montage 1, the maximum Hip ROM increased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation, and in the Montage 2, the maximum Hip ROM decreased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. The pain perception in the Montage 1 decreased in the post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. In the post-stimulation, pain perception for the Montage 1 was lower compared to Montage 2 (p = 0.005), and sham (p = 0.004). When the anodic stimulus was applied on the left DLPFC and the cathodic stimulus on the motor cortex, an increase in ROM and a reduction in the pain perception was observed. This montage may to modulate pain perception and joint flexibility.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anodal stimulation tDCS</subject><subject>Cathodal stimulation tDCS</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint flexibility</subject><subject>Joints - physiopathology</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Perception</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0304-3940</issn><issn>1872-7972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE2PFCEQhonRuOPqPzCGo5ce-e7mojETdTfZxIueCQOFy6SbboGeuP9exl49eqEq5Hmr4EHoNSV7Sqh6d9onWEeoe0ao3lMuOKVP0I4OPet63bOnaEc4ER3XglyhF6WcCCGSSvEcXTVUDoLzHfp1sAnXbFNx7Yh2xD5mcBW7NWdIFZcap3W0Nc4Jx2nJ8xlwI38AngOe5j_3NvnW-gsGeLEx4QWyg2ULJXwPdqz3D6318Rz9asfy4SV6FlqFV4_1Gn3__Onb4aa7-_rl9vDxrnNcsdoFMVhJFfijUJIoLW1QnmrNeQgq8MH6fpAWeipVkJpD65lWR0W0AHBM82v0dpvbnv5zhVLNFIuDcbQJ5rUYxnibywVTDRUb6vJcSoZglhwnmx8MJebi3JzM5txcnJvNeYu9edywHifw_0J_JTfg_QZA--c5QjbFRUgONtXGz_H_G34DcauW2Q</recordid><startdate>20190810</startdate><enddate>20190810</enddate><creator>Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias</creator><creator>Lattari, Eduardo</creator><creator>Torres, Gabriela</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes</creator><creator>Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho</creator><creator>Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão</creator><creator>Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques</creator><creator>Machado, Sérgio</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-7218</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190810</creationdate><title>Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve range of motion and modulate pain perception in healthy individuals?</title><author>Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias ; Lattari, Eduardo ; Torres, Gabriela ; Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes ; Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho ; Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão ; Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques ; Machado, Sérgio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f48a516edb4650695af6d19933ff6f38ad785ae7156f593e5ae296b6094eec293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anodal stimulation tDCS</topic><topic>Cathodal stimulation tDCS</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint flexibility</topic><topic>Joints - physiopathology</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Perception</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattari, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Sérgio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henriques, Ighor Amadeu Dias</au><au>Lattari, Eduardo</au><au>Torres, Gabriela</au><au>Rodrigues, Guilherme Moraes</au><au>Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho</au><au>Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão</au><au>Neto, Silvio Rodrigues Marques</au><au>Machado, Sérgio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve range of motion and modulate pain perception in healthy individuals?</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience letters</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Lett</addtitle><date>2019-08-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>707</volume><spage>134311</spage><epage>134311</epage><pages>134311-134311</pages><artnum>134311</artnum><issn>0304-3940</issn><eissn>1872-7972</eissn><abstract>•c-tDCS over motor cortex and a-tDCS over prefrontal cortex increases Hip ROM.•Only this montage reduced pain perception.•Inverted polarity reduced Hip ROM with no alterations in pain perception.
The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of different electrode assemblies and electric current polarity on the ROM of the hip and pain perception. Ten healthy male, sedentary, right-leg-dominant, and aged between 19 and 30 years (24.0 ± 4.0 years) subjects were recruited. For the experimental conditions, the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was performed with the following montages. In the montage 1, the cathodal electrode was placed over the motor cortex (MC) horizontally, and the anodal electrode was positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In the montage 2, the anodal electrode was placed over the MC bilaterally, and the cathode electrode was positioned over the left DLPFC. The sham montage was the same as the montage 1. In the montage 1 and 2 stimulation was applied with 2 mA current intensity for 20 min. In the Sham condition, the stimulator was turned off after 30 s of active stimulation and the electrodes remained on the participants for 20 min. Before and after experimental conditions (Pre-stimulation, Post-stimulation), the maximum Hip ROM and pain perception was measured. For the Montage 1, the maximum Hip ROM increased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation, and in the Montage 2, the maximum Hip ROM decreased in post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. The pain perception in the Montage 1 decreased in the post-stimulation compared to pre-stimulation. In the post-stimulation, pain perception for the Montage 1 was lower compared to Montage 2 (p = 0.005), and sham (p = 0.004). When the anodic stimulus was applied on the left DLPFC and the cathodic stimulus on the motor cortex, an increase in ROM and a reduction in the pain perception was observed. This montage may to modulate pain perception and joint flexibility.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31158433</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134311</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-7218</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3940 |
ispartof | Neuroscience letters, 2019-08, Vol.707, p.134311-134311, Article 134311 |
issn | 0304-3940 1872-7972 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2235063426 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult Anodal stimulation tDCS Cathodal stimulation tDCS Electrodes Humans Joint flexibility Joints - physiopathology Motor Cortex - physiopathology Pain Pain - physiopathology Pain - psychology Pain Perception Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology Range of Motion, Articular Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Young Adult |
title | Can transcranial direct current stimulation improve range of motion and modulate pain perception in healthy individuals? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A31%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20transcranial%20direct%20current%20stimulation%20improve%20range%20of%20motion%20and%20modulate%20pain%20perception%20in%20healthy%20individuals?&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20letters&rft.au=Henriques,%20Ighor%20Amadeu%20Dias&rft.date=2019-08-10&rft.volume=707&rft.spage=134311&rft.epage=134311&rft.pages=134311-134311&rft.artnum=134311&rft.issn=0304-3940&rft.eissn=1872-7972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2235063426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f48a516edb4650695af6d19933ff6f38ad785ae7156f593e5ae296b6094eec293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2235063426&rft_id=info:pmid/31158433&rfr_iscdi=true |