Loading…

A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues

The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Science of the total environment 2019-10, Vol.686, p.774-787
Main Authors: Costa, D., Quinteiro, P., Dias, A.C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53
container_end_page 787
container_issue
container_start_page 774
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 686
creator Costa, D.
Quinteiro, P.
Dias, A.C.
description The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects. [Display omitted] •There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242153976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969719324891</els_id><sourcerecordid>2242153976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2PFCEQhonRuOPqX1COHrZHoJtu8DaZ-JVs4kXPhIbqXSZ0M1L0mrn502Uy616tC3V43nrDQ8g7zrac8f7DYYsulFRgedgKxvWWyW3Xymdkw9WgG85E_5xsGOtUo3s9XJFXiAdWZ1D8JblqOddSKLkhf3YUT1hgtiU4muEhwG-aJhrDBNSdXASKKxYbFjuGGMqJWkRAnGEpH-l-zbkutAIFbugM5T75FNNdcDZSd29jhOUO8IbaxdMwHyOcg7UrLTQgroCvyYvJRoQ3j-81-fn504_91-b2-5dv-91t47quL82g-nbg0gs3CS0mO2kuppYJ1WkGvbeql50cp96PnfWDEL5rlWOasbFlSoFsr8n7y91jTr9qbzFzQAcx2gXSikaITnDZ6qGv6HBBXU6IGSZzzGG2-WQ4M2f95mCe9JuzfsOkqfpr8u1jyTrO4J9y_3xXYHcBoH61us7nQ7A48CGDK8an8N-SvxkfncY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2242153976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Costa, D. ; Quinteiro, P. ; Dias, A.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Costa, D. ; Quinteiro, P. ; Dias, A.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects. [Display omitted] •There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31195285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Life cycle assessment (LCA) ; Life cycle costing (LCC) ; Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) ; Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2019-10, Vol.686, p.774-787</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3451-0458</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costa, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinteiro, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, A.C.</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects. [Display omitted] •There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified.</description><subject>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</subject><subject>Life cycle costing (LCC)</subject><subject>Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)</subject><subject>Social life cycle assessment (SLCA)</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2PFCEQhonRuOPqX1COHrZHoJtu8DaZ-JVs4kXPhIbqXSZ0M1L0mrn502Uy616tC3V43nrDQ8g7zrac8f7DYYsulFRgedgKxvWWyW3Xymdkw9WgG85E_5xsGOtUo3s9XJFXiAdWZ1D8JblqOddSKLkhf3YUT1hgtiU4muEhwG-aJhrDBNSdXASKKxYbFjuGGMqJWkRAnGEpH-l-zbkutAIFbugM5T75FNNdcDZSd29jhOUO8IbaxdMwHyOcg7UrLTQgroCvyYvJRoQ3j-81-fn504_91-b2-5dv-91t47quL82g-nbg0gs3CS0mO2kuppYJ1WkGvbeql50cp96PnfWDEL5rlWOasbFlSoFsr8n7y91jTr9qbzFzQAcx2gXSikaITnDZ6qGv6HBBXU6IGSZzzGG2-WQ4M2f95mCe9JuzfsOkqfpr8u1jyTrO4J9y_3xXYHcBoH61us7nQ7A48CGDK8an8N-SvxkfncY</recordid><startdate>20191010</startdate><enddate>20191010</enddate><creator>Costa, D.</creator><creator>Quinteiro, P.</creator><creator>Dias, A.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-0458</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191010</creationdate><title>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</title><author>Costa, D. ; Quinteiro, P. ; Dias, A.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</topic><topic>Life cycle costing (LCC)</topic><topic>Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)</topic><topic>Social life cycle assessment (SLCA)</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costa, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinteiro, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, A.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costa, D.</au><au>Quinteiro, P.</au><au>Dias, A.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2019-10-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>686</volume><spage>774</spage><epage>787</epage><pages>774-787</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects. [Display omitted] •There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31195285</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-0458</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2019-10, Vol.686, p.774-787
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242153976
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Life cycle assessment (LCA)
Life cycle costing (LCC)
Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)
Social life cycle assessment (SLCA)
Systematic review
title A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A01%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20life%20cycle%20sustainability%20assessment:%20Current%20state,%20methodological%20challenges,%20and%20implementation%20issues&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Costa,%20D.&rft.date=2019-10-10&rft.volume=686&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=787&rft.pages=774-787&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2242153976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2242153976&rft_id=info:pmid/31195285&rfr_iscdi=true