Loading…
A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues
The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Science of the total environment 2019-10, Vol.686, p.774-787 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53 |
container_end_page | 787 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 774 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 686 |
creator | Costa, D. Quinteiro, P. Dias, A.C. |
description | The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects.
[Display omitted]
•There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242153976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969719324891</els_id><sourcerecordid>2242153976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2PFCEQhonRuOPqX1COHrZHoJtu8DaZ-JVs4kXPhIbqXSZ0M1L0mrn502Uy616tC3V43nrDQ8g7zrac8f7DYYsulFRgedgKxvWWyW3Xymdkw9WgG85E_5xsGOtUo3s9XJFXiAdWZ1D8JblqOddSKLkhf3YUT1hgtiU4muEhwG-aJhrDBNSdXASKKxYbFjuGGMqJWkRAnGEpH-l-zbkutAIFbugM5T75FNNdcDZSd29jhOUO8IbaxdMwHyOcg7UrLTQgroCvyYvJRoQ3j-81-fn504_91-b2-5dv-91t47quL82g-nbg0gs3CS0mO2kuppYJ1WkGvbeql50cp96PnfWDEL5rlWOasbFlSoFsr8n7y91jTr9qbzFzQAcx2gXSikaITnDZ6qGv6HBBXU6IGSZzzGG2-WQ4M2f95mCe9JuzfsOkqfpr8u1jyTrO4J9y_3xXYHcBoH61us7nQ7A48CGDK8an8N-SvxkfncY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2242153976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Costa, D. ; Quinteiro, P. ; Dias, A.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Costa, D. ; Quinteiro, P. ; Dias, A.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects.
[Display omitted]
•There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31195285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Life cycle assessment (LCA) ; Life cycle costing (LCC) ; Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) ; Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2019-10, Vol.686, p.774-787</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3451-0458</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costa, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinteiro, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, A.C.</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects.
[Display omitted]
•There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified.</description><subject>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</subject><subject>Life cycle costing (LCC)</subject><subject>Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)</subject><subject>Social life cycle assessment (SLCA)</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2PFCEQhonRuOPqX1COHrZHoJtu8DaZ-JVs4kXPhIbqXSZ0M1L0mrn502Uy616tC3V43nrDQ8g7zrac8f7DYYsulFRgedgKxvWWyW3Xymdkw9WgG85E_5xsGOtUo3s9XJFXiAdWZ1D8JblqOddSKLkhf3YUT1hgtiU4muEhwG-aJhrDBNSdXASKKxYbFjuGGMqJWkRAnGEpH-l-zbkutAIFbugM5T75FNNdcDZSd29jhOUO8IbaxdMwHyOcg7UrLTQgroCvyYvJRoQ3j-81-fn504_91-b2-5dv-91t47quL82g-nbg0gs3CS0mO2kuppYJ1WkGvbeql50cp96PnfWDEL5rlWOasbFlSoFsr8n7y91jTr9qbzFzQAcx2gXSikaITnDZ6qGv6HBBXU6IGSZzzGG2-WQ4M2f95mCe9JuzfsOkqfpr8u1jyTrO4J9y_3xXYHcBoH61us7nQ7A48CGDK8an8N-SvxkfncY</recordid><startdate>20191010</startdate><enddate>20191010</enddate><creator>Costa, D.</creator><creator>Quinteiro, P.</creator><creator>Dias, A.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-0458</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191010</creationdate><title>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</title><author>Costa, D. ; Quinteiro, P. ; Dias, A.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</topic><topic>Life cycle costing (LCC)</topic><topic>Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)</topic><topic>Social life cycle assessment (SLCA)</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costa, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinteiro, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, A.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costa, D.</au><au>Quinteiro, P.</au><au>Dias, A.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2019-10-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>686</volume><spage>774</spage><epage>787</epage><pages>774-787</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) is a tool to assess sustainability from a life cycle perspective, which has been receiving increased attention over the years. This work presents a systematic review of the current application of LCSA, presenting the foundations, main methods, current operationalization state, and major challenges to its broad implementation. The review protocol considered the search of keywords in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The search has considered the literature published or in the press until December 2018, resulting in the selection of 144 articles written in English. Of those, 71 articles operationalize LCSA in real case studies, while the remaining consist of review, viewpoint, and methodological development articles. This review demonstrates that the use of LCSA has been increasing in recent years. Today, the most applied approach is to consider LCSA as the sum of life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social life cycle assessment because it is built on the methodologies that already exist and are under continuous development. However, the lack of harmonization of the methodology is a central challenge to its operationalization. Therefore, LCSA still requires further improvement in, among others, definition of coherent system boundaries, the development of robust databases to allow the assessment of economic and social perspectives, definition of impact categories that allow comparability between studies, development of impact assessment methods, development of methods to carry out uncertainty analysis, and communication strategies. Besides, further case studies should be developed to support the improvement of the methodology and a better understanding of the interaction of the environmental, economic, and social aspects.
[Display omitted]
•There are several approaches to conduct LCSA.•LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA is the most used approach.•Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are widely used to assess LCSA.•Methodological challenges for operationalization of LCSA are identified.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31195285</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-0458</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2019-10, Vol.686, p.774-787 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242153976 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Life cycle assessment (LCA) Life cycle costing (LCC) Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) Systematic review |
title | A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A01%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20life%20cycle%20sustainability%20assessment:%20Current%20state,%20methodological%20challenges,%20and%20implementation%20issues&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Costa,%20D.&rft.date=2019-10-10&rft.volume=686&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=787&rft.pages=774-787&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2242153976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7863715d2cf292faf912f3028490e6da86545bf6db4ad722d438c0900b3088e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2242153976&rft_id=info:pmid/31195285&rfr_iscdi=true |