Loading…

Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension

•The functional interpretation of the N400 and the P600 is still a matter of debate.•In a single ERP study, we tested the competing hypotheses about both components.•The results show that the N400 indexes retrieval rather than integration processes.•The P600 indexes general integration difficulty, n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and cognition 2019-10, Vol.135, p.103569-103569, Article 103569
Main Authors: Delogu, Francesca, Brouwer, Harm, Crocker, Matthew W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-793b1345b4a012f718c6ff19e81f48ac2f8de08d5b61854cd508d852f8ec75453
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-793b1345b4a012f718c6ff19e81f48ac2f8de08d5b61854cd508d852f8ec75453
container_end_page 103569
container_issue
container_start_page 103569
container_title Brain and cognition
container_volume 135
creator Delogu, Francesca
Brouwer, Harm
Crocker, Matthew W.
description •The functional interpretation of the N400 and the P600 is still a matter of debate.•In a single ERP study, we tested the competing hypotheses about both components.•The results show that the N400 indexes retrieval rather than integration processes.•The P600 indexes general integration difficulty, not syntactic processes alone.•Findings suggest spatiotemporal overlap between the N400 and P600 components. The functional interpretation of two salient language-sensitive ERP components – the N400 and the P600 – remains a matter of debate. Prominent alternative accounts link the N400 to processes related to lexical retrieval, semantic integration, or both, while the P600 has been associated with syntactic reanalysis or, alternatively, to semantic integration. The often overlapping predictions of these competing accounts in extant experimental designs, however, has meant that previous findings have failed to clearly decide among them. Here, we present an experiment that directly tests the competing hypotheses using a design that clearly teases apart the retrieval versus integration view of the N400, while also dissociating a syntactic reanalysis/reprocessing account of the P600 from semantic integration. Our findings provide support for an integrated functional interpretation according to which the N400 reflects context-sensitive lexical retrieval – but not integration – processes. While the observed P600 effects were not predicted by any account, we argue that they can be reconciled with the integration view, if spatio-temporal overlap of ERP components is taken into consideration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242157504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278262618304299</els_id><sourcerecordid>2296097676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-793b1345b4a012f718c6ff19e81f48ac2f8de08d5b61854cd508d852f8ec75453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFX4CEInFZDknHjh07Bw6oKgWpajnA2XLsyeJV1llsZ1X-PV62cODAyZ7RM-98vIS8ptBQoN3VthlMcLZhQPsGRAMgn5EVhR5qRrl8TlbApKpZx7pzcpHSFgB6ztgLct5SBowKtSLTzQFDriNOJqOr9nMuoTdTqnxw-FhN-OitmaqIOXo8lN_6ngO8q0rrgmTcRJP9HKr1l-6Ydkv0YVNNJmwWs8HKzrt9xO8YUoFekrOxSOOrp_eSfPt48_X6U333cPv5-sNdbXmvci37dqAtFwM3QNkoqbLdONIeFR25MpaNyiEoJ4aOKsGtEyVQoqTRSsFFe0nWJ919nH8smLLe-WRxKlPhvCTNGC_bSwG8oG__QbfzEkOZrlB9B73sZFeo9kTZOKcUcdT76Hcm_tQU9NEMvdW_zdBHMzQIXcwoVW-etJdhh-5vzZ_rF-D9CcByjIPHqJP1GCw6H9Fm7Wb_3wa_AKgSmh8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2296097676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Delogu, Francesca ; Brouwer, Harm ; Crocker, Matthew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Delogu, Francesca ; Brouwer, Harm ; Crocker, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><description>•The functional interpretation of the N400 and the P600 is still a matter of debate.•In a single ERP study, we tested the competing hypotheses about both components.•The results show that the N400 indexes retrieval rather than integration processes.•The P600 indexes general integration difficulty, not syntactic processes alone.•Findings suggest spatiotemporal overlap between the N400 and P600 components. The functional interpretation of two salient language-sensitive ERP components – the N400 and the P600 – remains a matter of debate. Prominent alternative accounts link the N400 to processes related to lexical retrieval, semantic integration, or both, while the P600 has been associated with syntactic reanalysis or, alternatively, to semantic integration. The often overlapping predictions of these competing accounts in extant experimental designs, however, has meant that previous findings have failed to clearly decide among them. Here, we present an experiment that directly tests the competing hypotheses using a design that clearly teases apart the retrieval versus integration view of the N400, while also dissociating a syntactic reanalysis/reprocessing account of the P600 from semantic integration. Our findings provide support for an integrated functional interpretation according to which the N400 reflects context-sensitive lexical retrieval – but not integration – processes. While the observed P600 effects were not predicted by any account, we argue that they can be reconciled with the integration view, if spatio-temporal overlap of ERP components is taken into consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31202158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Brain - physiology ; Comprehension - physiology ; Discourse comprehension ; Electroencephalography ; Event-related potentials ; Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Humans ; Integration ; Language ; N400 ; P600 ; Semantic integration ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 2019-10, Vol.135, p.103569-103569, Article 103569</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-793b1345b4a012f718c6ff19e81f48ac2f8de08d5b61854cd508d852f8ec75453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-793b1345b4a012f718c6ff19e81f48ac2f8de08d5b61854cd508d852f8ec75453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31202158$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delogu, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Harm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crocker, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><title>Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>•The functional interpretation of the N400 and the P600 is still a matter of debate.•In a single ERP study, we tested the competing hypotheses about both components.•The results show that the N400 indexes retrieval rather than integration processes.•The P600 indexes general integration difficulty, not syntactic processes alone.•Findings suggest spatiotemporal overlap between the N400 and P600 components. The functional interpretation of two salient language-sensitive ERP components – the N400 and the P600 – remains a matter of debate. Prominent alternative accounts link the N400 to processes related to lexical retrieval, semantic integration, or both, while the P600 has been associated with syntactic reanalysis or, alternatively, to semantic integration. The often overlapping predictions of these competing accounts in extant experimental designs, however, has meant that previous findings have failed to clearly decide among them. Here, we present an experiment that directly tests the competing hypotheses using a design that clearly teases apart the retrieval versus integration view of the N400, while also dissociating a syntactic reanalysis/reprocessing account of the P600 from semantic integration. Our findings provide support for an integrated functional interpretation according to which the N400 reflects context-sensitive lexical retrieval – but not integration – processes. While the observed P600 effects were not predicted by any account, we argue that they can be reconciled with the integration view, if spatio-temporal overlap of ERP components is taken into consideration.</description><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Discourse comprehension</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>N400</subject><subject>P600</subject><subject>Semantic integration</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFX4CEInFZDknHjh07Bw6oKgWpajnA2XLsyeJV1llsZ1X-PV62cODAyZ7RM-98vIS8ptBQoN3VthlMcLZhQPsGRAMgn5EVhR5qRrl8TlbApKpZx7pzcpHSFgB6ztgLct5SBowKtSLTzQFDriNOJqOr9nMuoTdTqnxw-FhN-OitmaqIOXo8lN_6ngO8q0rrgmTcRJP9HKr1l-6Ydkv0YVNNJmwWs8HKzrt9xO8YUoFekrOxSOOrp_eSfPt48_X6U333cPv5-sNdbXmvci37dqAtFwM3QNkoqbLdONIeFR25MpaNyiEoJ4aOKsGtEyVQoqTRSsFFe0nWJ919nH8smLLe-WRxKlPhvCTNGC_bSwG8oG__QbfzEkOZrlB9B73sZFeo9kTZOKcUcdT76Hcm_tQU9NEMvdW_zdBHMzQIXcwoVW-etJdhh-5vzZ_rF-D9CcByjIPHqJP1GCw6H9Fm7Wb_3wa_AKgSmh8</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Delogu, Francesca</creator><creator>Brouwer, Harm</creator><creator>Crocker, Matthew W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension</title><author>Delogu, Francesca ; Brouwer, Harm ; Crocker, Matthew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-793b1345b4a012f718c6ff19e81f48ac2f8de08d5b61854cd508d852f8ec75453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Discourse comprehension</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>N400</topic><topic>P600</topic><topic>Semantic integration</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delogu, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Harm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crocker, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delogu, Francesca</au><au>Brouwer, Harm</au><au>Crocker, Matthew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>135</volume><spage>103569</spage><epage>103569</epage><pages>103569-103569</pages><artnum>103569</artnum><issn>0278-2626</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><abstract>•The functional interpretation of the N400 and the P600 is still a matter of debate.•In a single ERP study, we tested the competing hypotheses about both components.•The results show that the N400 indexes retrieval rather than integration processes.•The P600 indexes general integration difficulty, not syntactic processes alone.•Findings suggest spatiotemporal overlap between the N400 and P600 components. The functional interpretation of two salient language-sensitive ERP components – the N400 and the P600 – remains a matter of debate. Prominent alternative accounts link the N400 to processes related to lexical retrieval, semantic integration, or both, while the P600 has been associated with syntactic reanalysis or, alternatively, to semantic integration. The often overlapping predictions of these competing accounts in extant experimental designs, however, has meant that previous findings have failed to clearly decide among them. Here, we present an experiment that directly tests the competing hypotheses using a design that clearly teases apart the retrieval versus integration view of the N400, while also dissociating a syntactic reanalysis/reprocessing account of the P600 from semantic integration. Our findings provide support for an integrated functional interpretation according to which the N400 reflects context-sensitive lexical retrieval – but not integration – processes. While the observed P600 effects were not predicted by any account, we argue that they can be reconciled with the integration view, if spatio-temporal overlap of ERP components is taken into consideration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31202158</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.007</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2626
ispartof Brain and cognition, 2019-10, Vol.135, p.103569-103569, Article 103569
issn 0278-2626
1090-2147
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242157504
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Brain - physiology
Comprehension - physiology
Discourse comprehension
Electroencephalography
Event-related potentials
Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Humans
Integration
Language
N400
P600
Semantic integration
Semantics
title Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A40%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Event-related%20potentials%20index%20lexical%20retrieval%20(N400)%20and%20integration%20(P600)%20during%20language%20comprehension&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Delogu,%20Francesca&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=135&rft.spage=103569&rft.epage=103569&rft.pages=103569-103569&rft.artnum=103569&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2296097676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-793b1345b4a012f718c6ff19e81f48ac2f8de08d5b61854cd508d852f8ec75453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2296097676&rft_id=info:pmid/31202158&rfr_iscdi=true