Preexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV Infection: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

• Published in: JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2019-06, Vol.321 (22), p.2214-2230
• Main Authors: Chou, Roger, Evans, Christopher, Hoverman, Adam, Sun, Christina, Dana, Tracy, Bougatsos, Christina, Grusing, Sara, Korthuis, P. Todd
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Adhesion; Antiretroviral agents; Antiretroviral therapy; Clinical trials; Diagnostic systems; Discrimination; Emtricitabine; Health risk assessment; Health risks; HIV; Human immunodeficiency virus; Infections; Literature reviews; Medical research; Mortality; Prevention; Prophylaxis; Public health; Risk management; Risk reduction; Sexually transmitted diseases; STD; Systematic review; Task forces; Tenofovir
• ISSN: 0098-7484; 1538-3598
• DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2591

IMPORTANCE: Effective prevention strategies for HIV infection are an important public health priority. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) involves use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) daily or before and after sex to decrease risk of acquiring HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the evidence on the benefits and harms of PrEP, instruments for predicting incident HIV infection, and PrEP adherence to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE through June 2018, with surveillance through January 2019. STUDY SELECTION: English-language placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials of oral PrEP with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy; studies on the diagnostic accuracy of instruments for predicting incident HIV infection; and studies on PrEP adherence. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Dual review of titles and abstracts, full-text articles, study quality, and data abstraction. Data were pooled using the Dersimonian and Laird random-effects model for effects of PrEP on HIV infection, mortality, and harms. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: HIV acquisition, mortality, and harms; adherence to PrEP; and diagnostic test accuracy and discrimination. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (N = 18 837), 8 observational studies (N = 3884), and 7 studies of diagnostic accuracy (N = 32 279) were included. PrEP was associated with decreased risk of HIV infection vs placebo or no PrEP after 4 months to 4 years (11 trials; relative risk [RR], 0.46 [95% CI, 0.33-0.66]; I2 = 67%; absolute risk reduction [ARD], −2.0% [95% CI, −2.8% to −1.2%]). Greater adherence was associated with greater efficacy (RR with adherence ≥70%, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.19-0.39]; I2 = 0%) in 6 trials. PrEP was associated with an increased risk of renal adverse events (12 trials; RR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.18-1.75]; I2 = 0%; ARD, 0.56% [95% CI, 0.09%-1.04%]) and gastrointestinal adverse events (12 trials; RR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.26-2.11]; I2 = 43%; ARD, 1.95% [95% CI, 0.48%-3.43%]); most adverse events were mild and reversible. Instruments for predicting incident HIV infection had moderate discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.49-0.72) and require further validation. Adherence to PrEP in the United States in men who have sex with men varied widely (22%-90%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In adults at increased risk of HIV infe