Electrodermal activity during Lower Paleolithic stone tool handling

Objectives Hand coordination is a key feature in primate evolution at both behavioral and cognitive levels. Humans further improved their manual abilities, and their cognitive niche is deeply associated with hand‐tool relationships and technological capacity. A main cognitive change is thought to be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of human biology 2019-09, Vol.31 (5), p.e23279-n/a
Main Authors: Fedato, Annapaola, Silva‐Gago, María, Terradillos‐Bernal, Marcos, Alonso‐Alcalde, Rodrigo, Martín‐Guerra, Elena, Bruner, Emiliano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Archaeology
Cognitive ability
Emotional factors
Emotions
Exploration
Females
Hand tools
Handling
Males
Niches
Paleolithic
Prostheses
Skewed distributions
Stone
Weight
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives Hand coordination is a key feature in primate evolution at both behavioral and cognitive levels. Humans further improved their manual abilities, and their cognitive niche is deeply associated with hand‐tool relationships and technological capacity. A main cognitive change is thought to be related to the transition from Oldowan to Acheulean stone tool technology around 1.7 million years ago. In this survey, we test whether distinct Lower Paleolithic tools induce different electrophysiological reactions during haptic exploration. Methods Electrodermal activity is a relatively quick way to measure emotional and attentional changes during specific tasks. We analyzed changes of the electrodermal response and electrodermal level during Oldowan and Acheulean stone tool handling in a sample of 46 right‐handed adult subjects with no previous archeological knowledge. Results Electrodermal proxies for attention and emotion display a skewed distribution. Females present more variable reactions than males and more emotional engagement. Acheulean tools require longer manipulation time and exert less emotional response than Oldowan tools. Attention is influenced by tool length and weight, emotion is sensitive to tool thickness and weight, and manipulation time depends on tool length and width. Conclusions This study suggests subtle but detectable perceptual differences when handling Oldowan and Acheulean stone tools. Such variations associated with hand‐tool interaction can provide information on haptic and prosthetic capacities associated with our specialized technological resources. Perceptual changes in the archeological record can reveal evolutionary changes in the corresponding body‐tool cognitive mechanisms.
ISSN:1042-0533
1520-6300
DOI:10.1002/ajhb.23279