Assessing appropriateness of paediatric asthma management: A population‐based sample survey

• Published in: Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Vic.), 2020-01, Vol.25 (1), p.71-79
• Main Authors: Homaira, Nusrat, Wiles, Louise K., Gardner, Claire, Molloy, Charlotte J., Arnolda, Gaston, Ting, Hsuen P., Hibbert, Peter, Boyling, Claire, Braithwaite, Jeffrey, Jaffe, Adam
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Asthma; asthma management guidelines, paediatrics; Children; Drug therapy; Medical records; paediatric asthma; Respiratory diseases
• ISSN: 1323-7799; 1440-1843
• DOI: 10.1111/resp.13611

ABSTRACT Background and objective We conducted a comprehensive assessment of guideline adherence in paediatric asthma care, including inpatient and ambulatory services, in Australia. Methods National and international clinical practice guidelines (CPG) relating to asthma in children were searched and 39 medical record audit indicator questions were developed. Retrospective medical record review was conducted across hospital inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) presentations, general practice (GP) and paediatrician consultations in three Australian states for children aged ≤15 years receiving care in 2012 and 2013. Eligibility of, and adherence to, indicators was assessed from medical records by nine experienced and purpose‐trained paediatric nurses (surveyors). Results Surveyors conducted 18 453 asthma indicator assessments across 1600 visits for 881 children in 129 locations. Overall, the adherence for asthma care across the 39 indicators was 58.1%, with 54.4% adherence at GP (95% CI: 46.0–62.5), 77.7% by paediatricians (95% CI: 40.5–97.0), 79.9% in ED (95% CI: 70.6–87.3) and 85.1% for inpatient care (95% CI: 76.7–91.5). For 14 acute asthma indicators, overall adherence was 56.3% (95% CI: 47.6–64.7). Lowest adherences were for recording all four types of vital signs in children aged >2 years presenting with asthma attack (15.1%, 95% CI: 8.7–23.7), and reviewing patients’ compliance, inhaler technique and triggers prior to commencing a new drug therapy (20.5%, 95% CI: 10.1–34.8). Conclusion The study demonstrated differences between existing care and CPG recommendations for paediatric asthma care in Australia. Evidence‐based interventions to improve adherence to CPG may help to standardize quality of paediatric asthma care and reduce variation of care. This study provides comprehensive findings on the quality of health care received by children with asthma care across different healthcare settings in Australia. There was marked variation in the quality of both pharmacological and non‐pharmacological management of paediatric asthma and children received quality care for