Loading…

The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis

Background Severe maternal morbidity continues to be on the rise in the US. Short birth spacing is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal morbidity, yet few studies have examined this association, possibly due to few available data sources to examine these rare events. Objective To examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.469-480
Main Authors: De Silva, Dane A., Thoma, Marie E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4407f0b4c19a83482c7772f0bf80369f09f53020f2b1c8baa782529b31147303
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4407f0b4c19a83482c7772f0bf80369f09f53020f2b1c8baa782529b31147303
container_end_page 480
container_issue 4
container_start_page 469
container_title Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology
container_volume 34
creator De Silva, Dane A.
Thoma, Marie E.
description Background Severe maternal morbidity continues to be on the rise in the US. Short birth spacing is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal morbidity, yet few studies have examined this association, possibly due to few available data sources to examine these rare events. Objective To examine the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and severe maternal morbidity using near‐national birth certificate data and account for known under‐reporting using probabilistic bias analysis. Methods We used revised 2014‐2017 birth certificate data, restricting to resident women with a non–first‐born singleton birth. We examined the following: (a) maternal blood transfusion, (b) admission to intensive care unit (ICU), (c) uterine rupture (among women with a prior caesarean delivery) and (d) third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal laceration (among vaginal deliveries) by IPI categories (
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ppe.12560
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2246240704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2246240704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4407f0b4c19a83482c7772f0bf80369f09f53020f2b1c8baa782529b31147303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQha2qFVwoi75AZambdhHwT-Ik3SFEaSWksrj7yHYmYJQ4qSe56L4LD9uB0C6Q8Gbko2_OjOYw9kmKU0nvbJrgVKrCiHdsI7UpMi2kec82Qpk6K4RSh-wI8V4IYYpaHbBDLZWWVVFt2OP2DrhFHH2wcxgjdzA_AEQe4gxpSnAbbfT79buzPbex5Qg7SMAHS1okbRiTC22YAyBfMMRbnmAXEFoen00JcSHNd9xDmkMXPDXy1s72Oz_nUxqddaEPOAdPnEWaYfs9BvzIPnS2Rzh5qcds--Nye_Ezu_599evi_DrzutAiy3NRdsLlXta20nmlfFmWipSuEtrUnag7wpTolJO-ctaWlSpU7bSUeamFPmZfV1ta5c8CODdDQA99byOMCzZK5UbRDJET-uUVej8uTzcgKpdG0sVNTdS3lfJpREzQNVMKg037RormKbGGEmueEyP284vj4gZo_5P_IiLgbAUeQg_7t52am5vL1fIvR5ahmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416102669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>De Silva, Dane A. ; Thoma, Marie E.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Silva, Dane A. ; Thoma, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Severe maternal morbidity continues to be on the rise in the US. Short birth spacing is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal morbidity, yet few studies have examined this association, possibly due to few available data sources to examine these rare events. Objective To examine the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and severe maternal morbidity using near‐national birth certificate data and account for known under‐reporting using probabilistic bias analysis. Methods We used revised 2014‐2017 birth certificate data, restricting to resident women with a non–first‐born singleton birth. We examined the following: (a) maternal blood transfusion, (b) admission to intensive care unit (ICU), (c) uterine rupture (among women with a prior caesarean delivery) and (d) third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal laceration (among vaginal deliveries) by IPI categories (&lt;6, 6‐11, 12‐17, 18‐23, 24‐59 and 60+ months). Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using log‐binomial regression, adjusting for select maternal characteristics. Probabilistic bias analyses were performed. Results Compared with IPI 18 to 23 months, adjusted models revealed that the risk of maternal transfusion followed a U‐shaped curve with IPI, while risk of ICU admission and perineal laceration increased with longer IPI. Risk of uterine rupture was highest among IPI &lt;6 months. With the exception of maternal transfusion, these findings persisted regardless of the extent or type of misclassification examined in bias analyses. Conclusions Associations between IPI and maternal morbidity varied by outcome, even after adjusting for misclassification of SMM. Differences across maternal health outcomes should be considered when counselling and making recommendations regarding optimal birth spacing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-5022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12560</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31231858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Birth ; birth certificate ; Birth certificates ; birth spacing ; Blood transfusion ; Confidence intervals ; Health risk assessment ; interpregnancy interval ; maternal morbidity ; Morbidity ; probabilistic bias ; Probabilistic methods ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Statistical analysis ; Transfusion ; Uterus ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.469-480</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4407f0b4c19a83482c7772f0bf80369f09f53020f2b1c8baa782529b31147303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4407f0b4c19a83482c7772f0bf80369f09f53020f2b1c8baa782529b31147303</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9267-4384 ; 0000-0001-6558-2716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31231858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Silva, Dane A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><title>The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis</title><title>Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology</title><addtitle>Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Background Severe maternal morbidity continues to be on the rise in the US. Short birth spacing is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal morbidity, yet few studies have examined this association, possibly due to few available data sources to examine these rare events. Objective To examine the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and severe maternal morbidity using near‐national birth certificate data and account for known under‐reporting using probabilistic bias analysis. Methods We used revised 2014‐2017 birth certificate data, restricting to resident women with a non–first‐born singleton birth. We examined the following: (a) maternal blood transfusion, (b) admission to intensive care unit (ICU), (c) uterine rupture (among women with a prior caesarean delivery) and (d) third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal laceration (among vaginal deliveries) by IPI categories (&lt;6, 6‐11, 12‐17, 18‐23, 24‐59 and 60+ months). Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using log‐binomial regression, adjusting for select maternal characteristics. Probabilistic bias analyses were performed. Results Compared with IPI 18 to 23 months, adjusted models revealed that the risk of maternal transfusion followed a U‐shaped curve with IPI, while risk of ICU admission and perineal laceration increased with longer IPI. Risk of uterine rupture was highest among IPI &lt;6 months. With the exception of maternal transfusion, these findings persisted regardless of the extent or type of misclassification examined in bias analyses. Conclusions Associations between IPI and maternal morbidity varied by outcome, even after adjusting for misclassification of SMM. Differences across maternal health outcomes should be considered when counselling and making recommendations regarding optimal birth spacing.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>birth certificate</subject><subject>Birth certificates</subject><subject>birth spacing</subject><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>interpregnancy interval</subject><subject>maternal morbidity</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>probabilistic bias</subject><subject>Probabilistic methods</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>0269-5022</issn><issn>1365-3016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQha2qFVwoi75AZambdhHwT-Ik3SFEaSWksrj7yHYmYJQ4qSe56L4LD9uB0C6Q8Gbko2_OjOYw9kmKU0nvbJrgVKrCiHdsI7UpMi2kec82Qpk6K4RSh-wI8V4IYYpaHbBDLZWWVVFt2OP2DrhFHH2wcxgjdzA_AEQe4gxpSnAbbfT79buzPbex5Qg7SMAHS1okbRiTC22YAyBfMMRbnmAXEFoen00JcSHNd9xDmkMXPDXy1s72Oz_nUxqddaEPOAdPnEWaYfs9BvzIPnS2Rzh5qcds--Nye_Ezu_599evi_DrzutAiy3NRdsLlXta20nmlfFmWipSuEtrUnag7wpTolJO-ctaWlSpU7bSUeamFPmZfV1ta5c8CODdDQA99byOMCzZK5UbRDJET-uUVej8uTzcgKpdG0sVNTdS3lfJpREzQNVMKg037RormKbGGEmueEyP284vj4gZo_5P_IiLgbAUeQg_7t52am5vL1fIvR5ahmQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>De Silva, Dane A.</creator><creator>Thoma, Marie E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-4384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-2716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis</title><author>De Silva, Dane A. ; Thoma, Marie E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4407f0b4c19a83482c7772f0bf80369f09f53020f2b1c8baa782529b31147303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>birth certificate</topic><topic>Birth certificates</topic><topic>birth spacing</topic><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>interpregnancy interval</topic><topic>maternal morbidity</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>probabilistic bias</topic><topic>Probabilistic methods</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Silva, Dane A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Marie E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Silva, Dane A.</au><au>Thoma, Marie E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis</atitle><jtitle>Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>469-480</pages><issn>0269-5022</issn><eissn>1365-3016</eissn><abstract>Background Severe maternal morbidity continues to be on the rise in the US. Short birth spacing is a modifiable risk factor associated with maternal morbidity, yet few studies have examined this association, possibly due to few available data sources to examine these rare events. Objective To examine the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and severe maternal morbidity using near‐national birth certificate data and account for known under‐reporting using probabilistic bias analysis. Methods We used revised 2014‐2017 birth certificate data, restricting to resident women with a non–first‐born singleton birth. We examined the following: (a) maternal blood transfusion, (b) admission to intensive care unit (ICU), (c) uterine rupture (among women with a prior caesarean delivery) and (d) third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal laceration (among vaginal deliveries) by IPI categories (&lt;6, 6‐11, 12‐17, 18‐23, 24‐59 and 60+ months). Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using log‐binomial regression, adjusting for select maternal characteristics. Probabilistic bias analyses were performed. Results Compared with IPI 18 to 23 months, adjusted models revealed that the risk of maternal transfusion followed a U‐shaped curve with IPI, while risk of ICU admission and perineal laceration increased with longer IPI. Risk of uterine rupture was highest among IPI &lt;6 months. With the exception of maternal transfusion, these findings persisted regardless of the extent or type of misclassification examined in bias analyses. Conclusions Associations between IPI and maternal morbidity varied by outcome, even after adjusting for misclassification of SMM. Differences across maternal health outcomes should be considered when counselling and making recommendations regarding optimal birth spacing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31231858</pmid><doi>10.1111/ppe.12560</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-4384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-2716</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-5022
ispartof Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.469-480
issn 0269-5022
1365-3016
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2246240704
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Bias
Birth
birth certificate
Birth certificates
birth spacing
Blood transfusion
Confidence intervals
Health risk assessment
interpregnancy interval
maternal morbidity
Morbidity
probabilistic bias
Probabilistic methods
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Rupture
Rupturing
Statistical analysis
Transfusion
Uterus
Vagina
title The association between interpregnancy interval and severe maternal morbidities using revised national birth certificate data: A probabilistic bias analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A07%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20association%20between%20interpregnancy%20interval%20and%20severe%20maternal%20morbidities%20using%20revised%20national%20birth%20certificate%20data:%20A%20probabilistic%20bias%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Paediatric%20and%20perinatal%20epidemiology&rft.au=De%20Silva,%20Dane%20A.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=469-480&rft.issn=0269-5022&rft.eissn=1365-3016&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppe.12560&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2246240704%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4407f0b4c19a83482c7772f0bf80369f09f53020f2b1c8baa782529b31147303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416102669&rft_id=info:pmid/31231858&rfr_iscdi=true