Loading…

Effectiveness of black tea versus placebo in subjects with hypercholesterolemia: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis

To determine if the black tea is more effective in serum lipid profile that placebo in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The databases Medline, Central, Embase, Lilacs, Cinahl, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews 2019-05, Vol.13 (3), p.2250-2258
Main Authors: Araya-Quintanilla, Felipe, Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor, Moyano-Gálvez, Valeria, Muñoz-Yánez, María Jesús, Pavez, Leonardo, García, Katherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To determine if the black tea is more effective in serum lipid profile that placebo in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The databases Medline, Central, Embase, Lilacs, Cinahl, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched from inception up to January 2019. RCTs that compared black tea versus placebo, that included serum lipid profile outcomes in subjects older than 18 years of age with hypercholesterolemia. Seven RCTs met the eligibility criteria, and for the quantitative synthesis, six studies were included. Mean difference for total cholesterol was 1.67 mg/dl 95% CI = -5.47 to 8.80 (p = 0.65), mean difference 0.28 mg/dl, 95% CI = -3.89 to 4.45 (p = 0.90) for triglycerides, mean difference 3.21 mg/dl, 95% CI = -11.02 to 4.60 (p = 0.42) for low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, mean difference 0.38 mg/dl, 95% CI = -1.12 to 1.87 (p = 0.62) for high density lipoprotein-cholesterol. In the short term, no significant differences were found in lipid serum profile comparing black tea consumption with placebo.
ISSN:1871-4021
1878-0334
DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.019