Loading…

High incidence of hematologic malignancy relapse after allogeneic transplantation in patients with low Epstein-Barr virus–specific T-cell counts

AbstractBackgroundAssociation between low counts of herpesvirus-specific T cells and subsequent relapse of hematologic malignancy has been shown in two retrospective studies. MethodsHere we present results of a prospective validation study. Multiple subsets of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)–specific T cel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cytotherapy (Oxford, England) England), 2019-08, Vol.21 (8), p.886-894
Main Authors: GUPTA, MEHUL, KANNAPPAN, SUNAND, KALRA, AMIT, LAM, CYNTHIA, DHARMANI-KHAN, POONAM, WILLIAMSON, TYLER, TELLIER, RAYMOND, DALY, ANDREW, KHAN, FAISAL M, STOREK, JAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AbstractBackgroundAssociation between low counts of herpesvirus-specific T cells and subsequent relapse of hematologic malignancy has been shown in two retrospective studies. MethodsHere we present results of a prospective validation study. Multiple subsets of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)–specific T cells were measured in 69 patients on day 56 and 84, using intracellular flow cytometry after incubation of blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) with EBV peptides or lysate. ResultsAll EBV T-cell subsets measured, both on day 56 and 84, were lower in patients who did versus did not subsequently relapse. This was most significant for day 56 EBV lysate-stimulated CD8 T cells producing interferon-gamma. Patients with day 56 counts of this subset >5/µL had a significantly lower likelihood of relapse compared with those with ≤5/µL (subhazard ratio, 5.7; P = 0.007). Similar significant associations were shown for a total of seven EBV T-cell subsets on day 56 and nine subsets on day 84. However, sensitivity and specificity of relapse prediction using the count of any subset was low (area under the curve of receiver-operator characteristic curve was
ISSN:1465-3249
1477-2566
DOI:10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.06.001