Loading…

Sensory nutrition: The role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products

Many factors play a role in choosing what to eat or drink. We explored the role of sensation to explain these differences, drawing on consumer reviews for commercially available food products sold through an online retailer. We analyzed 393,568 unique food product reviews from Amazon customers with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiology & behavior 2019-10, Vol.209, p.112579-112579, Article 112579
Main Authors: Reed, Danielle R., Mainland, Joel D., Arayata, Charles J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-81f0ab9562f6c0532a68974c570d9828e20f35b59792987dce6be4c13728d0403
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-81f0ab9562f6c0532a68974c570d9828e20f35b59792987dce6be4c13728d0403
container_end_page 112579
container_issue
container_start_page 112579
container_title Physiology & behavior
container_volume 209
creator Reed, Danielle R.
Mainland, Joel D.
Arayata, Charles J.
description Many factors play a role in choosing what to eat or drink. We explored the role of sensation to explain these differences, drawing on consumer reviews for commercially available food products sold through an online retailer. We analyzed 393,568 unique food product reviews from Amazon customers with a total of 256,043 reviewers rating 67,553 products. Taste-associated words were mentioned more than words associated with price, food texture, customer service, nutrition, smell, or those referring to the trigeminal senses, e.g., “spicy”. We computed the overall number of reviews that mentioned taste qualities: the word taste was mentioned in over 30% of the reviews (N = 142,768), followed by sweet (10.7%, N = 42,315), bitter (2.9%, N = 11,424), sour (2.1%, N = 8252) and salty (1.4%, N = 5688). We identified 38 phrases used to describe the evaluation of sweetness, finding that ‘too sweet’ was used in nearly 0.8% of the reviews and oversweetness was mentioned over 25 times more often than under-sweetness. We then focused on ‘polarizing’ products, those that elicited a wide difference of opinion (as measured by the ranges of the product ratings). Using the products that had more than 50 reviews, we identified the top 10 most polarizing foods and provide representative comments about the polarized taste experience of consumers. Overall, these results support the primacy of taste in real-world food ratings and individualized taste experience, such as whether a product is ‘too sweet’. Analysis of consumer review data sets can provide information about purchasing decisions and customer sensory responses to particular commercially available products and represents a promising methodology for the emerging field of sensory nutrition. •Taste is mentioned in over 30% of consumer food reviews pointing to the primacy of sensory experience in when there are nearly limitless choices•Polarizing foods are those that elicit extreme and diverse viewpoints and are a new avenue to understand the biology of personal differences in food choice
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112579
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250646271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031938419301246</els_id><sourcerecordid>2250646271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-81f0ab9562f6c0532a68974c570d9828e20f35b59792987dce6be4c13728d0403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EouXxCSAv2aT4EccxG4QqXlKlLigSOytxJqqrJC62A-rfk6iFLbMZaebeuZqD0BUlM0podruZbde7UMJ6xghVM0qZkOoITWkueSKI_DhGU0I4TRTP0wk6C2FDhuIpP0UTTqlSw2KKlm_QBed3uOujt9G67g6v1oC9awC7GsciRMC2w3EcwpeF7zDOjWtb8MYWDa6dq_DWu6o3MVygk7poAlwe-jl6f3pczV-SxfL5df6wSExKWUxyWpOiVCJjdWaI4KzIciVTIySpVM5yYKTmohRKKqZyWRnISkgN5ZLlFUkJP0c3-7tD8GcPIerWBgNNU3Tg-qAZEyRLMybpIBV7qfEuBA-13nrbFn6nKdEjS73RB5Z6ZKn3LAff9SGiL1uo_ly_8AbB_V4Aw6MDGa-DsdAZqKwHE3Xl7D8RP9IEhxU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250646271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory nutrition: The role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Reed, Danielle R. ; Mainland, Joel D. ; Arayata, Charles J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, Danielle R. ; Mainland, Joel D. ; Arayata, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><description>Many factors play a role in choosing what to eat or drink. We explored the role of sensation to explain these differences, drawing on consumer reviews for commercially available food products sold through an online retailer. We analyzed 393,568 unique food product reviews from Amazon customers with a total of 256,043 reviewers rating 67,553 products. Taste-associated words were mentioned more than words associated with price, food texture, customer service, nutrition, smell, or those referring to the trigeminal senses, e.g., “spicy”. We computed the overall number of reviews that mentioned taste qualities: the word taste was mentioned in over 30% of the reviews (N = 142,768), followed by sweet (10.7%, N = 42,315), bitter (2.9%, N = 11,424), sour (2.1%, N = 8252) and salty (1.4%, N = 5688). We identified 38 phrases used to describe the evaluation of sweetness, finding that ‘too sweet’ was used in nearly 0.8% of the reviews and oversweetness was mentioned over 25 times more often than under-sweetness. We then focused on ‘polarizing’ products, those that elicited a wide difference of opinion (as measured by the ranges of the product ratings). Using the products that had more than 50 reviews, we identified the top 10 most polarizing foods and provide representative comments about the polarized taste experience of consumers. Overall, these results support the primacy of taste in real-world food ratings and individualized taste experience, such as whether a product is ‘too sweet’. Analysis of consumer review data sets can provide information about purchasing decisions and customer sensory responses to particular commercially available products and represents a promising methodology for the emerging field of sensory nutrition. •Taste is mentioned in over 30% of consumer food reviews pointing to the primacy of sensory experience in when there are nearly limitless choices•Polarizing foods are those that elicit extreme and diverse viewpoints and are a new avenue to understand the biology of personal differences in food choice</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31199938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bitterness ; Consumers ; Segmentation ; Sweetness ; Taste</subject><ispartof>Physiology &amp; behavior, 2019-10, Vol.209, p.112579-112579, Article 112579</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-81f0ab9562f6c0532a68974c570d9828e20f35b59792987dce6be4c13728d0403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-81f0ab9562f6c0532a68974c570d9828e20f35b59792987dce6be4c13728d0403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, Danielle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainland, Joel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arayata, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory nutrition: The role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products</title><title>Physiology &amp; behavior</title><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><description>Many factors play a role in choosing what to eat or drink. We explored the role of sensation to explain these differences, drawing on consumer reviews for commercially available food products sold through an online retailer. We analyzed 393,568 unique food product reviews from Amazon customers with a total of 256,043 reviewers rating 67,553 products. Taste-associated words were mentioned more than words associated with price, food texture, customer service, nutrition, smell, or those referring to the trigeminal senses, e.g., “spicy”. We computed the overall number of reviews that mentioned taste qualities: the word taste was mentioned in over 30% of the reviews (N = 142,768), followed by sweet (10.7%, N = 42,315), bitter (2.9%, N = 11,424), sour (2.1%, N = 8252) and salty (1.4%, N = 5688). We identified 38 phrases used to describe the evaluation of sweetness, finding that ‘too sweet’ was used in nearly 0.8% of the reviews and oversweetness was mentioned over 25 times more often than under-sweetness. We then focused on ‘polarizing’ products, those that elicited a wide difference of opinion (as measured by the ranges of the product ratings). Using the products that had more than 50 reviews, we identified the top 10 most polarizing foods and provide representative comments about the polarized taste experience of consumers. Overall, these results support the primacy of taste in real-world food ratings and individualized taste experience, such as whether a product is ‘too sweet’. Analysis of consumer review data sets can provide information about purchasing decisions and customer sensory responses to particular commercially available products and represents a promising methodology for the emerging field of sensory nutrition. •Taste is mentioned in over 30% of consumer food reviews pointing to the primacy of sensory experience in when there are nearly limitless choices•Polarizing foods are those that elicit extreme and diverse viewpoints and are a new avenue to understand the biology of personal differences in food choice</description><subject>Bitterness</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Sweetness</subject><subject>Taste</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EouXxCSAv2aT4EccxG4QqXlKlLigSOytxJqqrJC62A-rfk6iFLbMZaebeuZqD0BUlM0podruZbde7UMJ6xghVM0qZkOoITWkueSKI_DhGU0I4TRTP0wk6C2FDhuIpP0UTTqlSw2KKlm_QBed3uOujt9G67g6v1oC9awC7GsciRMC2w3EcwpeF7zDOjWtb8MYWDa6dq_DWu6o3MVygk7poAlwe-jl6f3pczV-SxfL5df6wSExKWUxyWpOiVCJjdWaI4KzIciVTIySpVM5yYKTmohRKKqZyWRnISkgN5ZLlFUkJP0c3-7tD8GcPIerWBgNNU3Tg-qAZEyRLMybpIBV7qfEuBA-13nrbFn6nKdEjS73RB5Z6ZKn3LAff9SGiL1uo_ly_8AbB_V4Aw6MDGa-DsdAZqKwHE3Xl7D8RP9IEhxU</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Reed, Danielle R.</creator><creator>Mainland, Joel D.</creator><creator>Arayata, Charles J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Sensory nutrition: The role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products</title><author>Reed, Danielle R. ; Mainland, Joel D. ; Arayata, Charles J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-81f0ab9562f6c0532a68974c570d9828e20f35b59792987dce6be4c13728d0403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bitterness</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Sweetness</topic><topic>Taste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, Danielle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainland, Joel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arayata, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, Danielle R.</au><au>Mainland, Joel D.</au><au>Arayata, Charles J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory nutrition: The role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products</atitle><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>209</volume><spage>112579</spage><epage>112579</epage><pages>112579-112579</pages><artnum>112579</artnum><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>Many factors play a role in choosing what to eat or drink. We explored the role of sensation to explain these differences, drawing on consumer reviews for commercially available food products sold through an online retailer. We analyzed 393,568 unique food product reviews from Amazon customers with a total of 256,043 reviewers rating 67,553 products. Taste-associated words were mentioned more than words associated with price, food texture, customer service, nutrition, smell, or those referring to the trigeminal senses, e.g., “spicy”. We computed the overall number of reviews that mentioned taste qualities: the word taste was mentioned in over 30% of the reviews (N = 142,768), followed by sweet (10.7%, N = 42,315), bitter (2.9%, N = 11,424), sour (2.1%, N = 8252) and salty (1.4%, N = 5688). We identified 38 phrases used to describe the evaluation of sweetness, finding that ‘too sweet’ was used in nearly 0.8% of the reviews and oversweetness was mentioned over 25 times more often than under-sweetness. We then focused on ‘polarizing’ products, those that elicited a wide difference of opinion (as measured by the ranges of the product ratings). Using the products that had more than 50 reviews, we identified the top 10 most polarizing foods and provide representative comments about the polarized taste experience of consumers. Overall, these results support the primacy of taste in real-world food ratings and individualized taste experience, such as whether a product is ‘too sweet’. Analysis of consumer review data sets can provide information about purchasing decisions and customer sensory responses to particular commercially available products and represents a promising methodology for the emerging field of sensory nutrition. •Taste is mentioned in over 30% of consumer food reviews pointing to the primacy of sensory experience in when there are nearly limitless choices•Polarizing foods are those that elicit extreme and diverse viewpoints and are a new avenue to understand the biology of personal differences in food choice</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31199938</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112579</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9384
ispartof Physiology & behavior, 2019-10, Vol.209, p.112579-112579, Article 112579
issn 0031-9384
1873-507X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250646271
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Bitterness
Consumers
Segmentation
Sweetness
Taste
title Sensory nutrition: The role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A31%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20nutrition:%20The%20role%20of%20taste%20in%20the%20reviews%20of%20commercial%20food%20products&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Reed,%20Danielle%20R.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=209&rft.spage=112579&rft.epage=112579&rft.pages=112579-112579&rft.artnum=112579&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2250646271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-81f0ab9562f6c0532a68974c570d9828e20f35b59792987dce6be4c13728d0403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250646271&rft_id=info:pmid/31199938&rfr_iscdi=true