Loading…

Integrated food waste and sewage treatment – A better approach than conventional food waste-sludge co-digestion for higher energy recovery via anaerobic digestion

[Display omitted] •Integrated food waste and sewerage treatment by anaerobic digestion is performed.•High digestion capability and increased energy generation potential is demonstrated.•Specific methane yield is 2.4-fold higher than from food waste-sludge co-digestion. This work proposes a new treat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresource technology 2019-10, Vol.289, p.121698-121698, Article 121698
Main Authors: Kaur, Guneet, Luo, Liwen, Chen, Guanghao, Wong, Jonathan W.C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Integrated food waste and sewerage treatment by anaerobic digestion is performed.•High digestion capability and increased energy generation potential is demonstrated.•Specific methane yield is 2.4-fold higher than from food waste-sludge co-digestion. This work proposes a new treatment approach involving both food waste disposal and sewerage treatment called MOWFAST i.e. Municipal Organic Waste management by combined Food waste disposal and Sewerage Treatment. MOWFAST involves mixing of food waste directly with raw sewage instead of separate addition to sludge and their combined anaerobic digestion (AD). Compared to conventional sludge digestion, MOWFAST exhibited better digestion capability and allowed a greater degradation of organic material along with higher production of methanogenic-favourable products from the beginning of digestion. This resulted in producing higher specific methane yields (7.86 LCH4/kg VSadded versus 0.95 LCH4/kg VSadded) and 1.4-fold higher cumulative methane yield over sludge AD. Furthermore, compared with conventional food waste-sludge co-digestion, MOWFAST gave higher solubilization of organic material (0.82 g sCOD/g VSadded versus 0.23 g sCOD/g VSadded) and specific methane yields (7.86 LCH4/kg VSadded versus 3.2 LCH4/kg VSadded). This proves its feasibility for digestion and methane generation potential.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121698