Loading…

Periodization of Plyometrics: Is There an Optimal Overload Principle?

ABSTRACTLievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Periodization of plyometricsIs there an optimal overload principle? J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—This study investigated the acute and chronic effects of 3 plyometric training (PT) programs with equal training loads (intensity × volume × freq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2669-2676
Main Authors: Lievens, Maarten, Bourgois, Jan G., Boone, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4751-b62c38c98e5859f1966d439c36314c201ef397d5fe7c6768e5e2b3dc1e61c693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4751-b62c38c98e5859f1966d439c36314c201ef397d5fe7c6768e5e2b3dc1e61c693
container_end_page 2676
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2669
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 35
creator Lievens, Maarten
Bourgois, Jan G.
Boone, Jan
description ABSTRACTLievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Periodization of plyometricsIs there an optimal overload principle? J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—This study investigated the acute and chronic effects of 3 plyometric training (PT) programs with equal training loads (intensity × volume × frequency) on speed, agility, and jumping performance. Forty-four male recreational team sport athletes were either assigned to a program that increased training volume with exercises of mixed intensity (Mix), kept training volume equal and increased exercise intensity (LowHi), increased training volume and kept exercise intensity low (Low), or to a control group (Control). Subjects were trained twice a week for 8 weeks and were tested for 5- (5 m) and 10-m sprint (10 m), 5 × 10-m shuttle run (5 × 10 m), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump without and with arm swing, and standing broad jump. Five-, 10- and 5 × 10-m performance did not change (p > 0.05) after the PT program. Jumping performance, except for SJ (p = 0.114), improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the PT groups compared with the control group. However, no mutual differences (p < 0.05) were established between plyometric groups. In addition, it was shown that a PT of high intensity was more likely to affect performance and blood inflammation markers in the following days. To conclude, PT programs following a different overload pattern, i.e., different combination of volume and intensity, but equal training load showed similar performance effects in recreationally trained men. However, before competition, a PT of low intensity is preferred over a PT of high intensity to avoid a decline in performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003231
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2252284286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575081481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4751-b62c38c98e5859f1966d439c36314c201ef397d5fe7c6768e5e2b3dc1e61c693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9v1DAQxS0EoqXwDRCKxIVLimf8JzYXhFaFFlXaldi7lXUm2hRvvNgJVfn0eLUtQj3AHGbm8HtPM4-x18DPQYF9__Xb4pz_VQIFPGGnoISoJZrmadm5lrXhACfsRc43nKNSSjxnJwJQG2vtKbtYURpiN_xqpyGOVeyrVbiLO5rS4POH6ipX6y0lqtqxWu6nYdeGavmTUohtV63SMPphH-jjS_asb0OmV_fzjK0_X6wXl_X18svV4tN17WWjoN5o9MJ4a0gZZXuwWndSWC-0AOmRA_XCNp3qqfG60QUj3IjOA2nw2ooz9u5ou0_xx0x5crshewqhHSnO2SEqRFOe1wV9-wi9iXMay3EOVaO4AWmgUPJI-RRzTtS7fSo_pjsH3B1SdiVl9zjlIntzbz5vdtT9ET3EWgBzBG5jmCjl72G-peS21IZp-z9v-Q8p54ASG1MjR4CDqD40FL8BPleV7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575081481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periodization of Plyometrics: Is There an Optimal Overload Principle?</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Lievens, Maarten ; Bourgois, Jan G. ; Boone, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lievens, Maarten ; Bourgois, Jan G. ; Boone, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTLievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Periodization of plyometricsIs there an optimal overload principle? J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—This study investigated the acute and chronic effects of 3 plyometric training (PT) programs with equal training loads (intensity × volume × frequency) on speed, agility, and jumping performance. Forty-four male recreational team sport athletes were either assigned to a program that increased training volume with exercises of mixed intensity (Mix), kept training volume equal and increased exercise intensity (LowHi), increased training volume and kept exercise intensity low (Low), or to a control group (Control). Subjects were trained twice a week for 8 weeks and were tested for 5- (5 m) and 10-m sprint (10 m), 5 × 10-m shuttle run (5 × 10 m), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump without and with arm swing, and standing broad jump. Five-, 10- and 5 × 10-m performance did not change (p &gt; 0.05) after the PT program. Jumping performance, except for SJ (p = 0.114), improved significantly (p &lt; 0.05) in the PT groups compared with the control group. However, no mutual differences (p &lt; 0.05) were established between plyometric groups. In addition, it was shown that a PT of high intensity was more likely to affect performance and blood inflammation markers in the following days. To conclude, PT programs following a different overload pattern, i.e., different combination of volume and intensity, but equal training load showed similar performance effects in recreationally trained men. However, before competition, a PT of low intensity is preferred over a PT of high intensity to avoid a decline in performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003231</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31268999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Chronic effects ; Exercise intensity ; Jumping</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2669-2676</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4751-b62c38c98e5859f1966d439c36314c201ef397d5fe7c6768e5e2b3dc1e61c693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4751-b62c38c98e5859f1966d439c36314c201ef397d5fe7c6768e5e2b3dc1e61c693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31268999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lievens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgois, Jan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boone, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Periodization of Plyometrics: Is There an Optimal Overload Principle?</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTLievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Periodization of plyometricsIs there an optimal overload principle? J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—This study investigated the acute and chronic effects of 3 plyometric training (PT) programs with equal training loads (intensity × volume × frequency) on speed, agility, and jumping performance. Forty-four male recreational team sport athletes were either assigned to a program that increased training volume with exercises of mixed intensity (Mix), kept training volume equal and increased exercise intensity (LowHi), increased training volume and kept exercise intensity low (Low), or to a control group (Control). Subjects were trained twice a week for 8 weeks and were tested for 5- (5 m) and 10-m sprint (10 m), 5 × 10-m shuttle run (5 × 10 m), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump without and with arm swing, and standing broad jump. Five-, 10- and 5 × 10-m performance did not change (p &gt; 0.05) after the PT program. Jumping performance, except for SJ (p = 0.114), improved significantly (p &lt; 0.05) in the PT groups compared with the control group. However, no mutual differences (p &lt; 0.05) were established between plyometric groups. In addition, it was shown that a PT of high intensity was more likely to affect performance and blood inflammation markers in the following days. To conclude, PT programs following a different overload pattern, i.e., different combination of volume and intensity, but equal training load showed similar performance effects in recreationally trained men. However, before competition, a PT of low intensity is preferred over a PT of high intensity to avoid a decline in performance.</description><subject>Chronic effects</subject><subject>Exercise intensity</subject><subject>Jumping</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9v1DAQxS0EoqXwDRCKxIVLimf8JzYXhFaFFlXaldi7lXUm2hRvvNgJVfn0eLUtQj3AHGbm8HtPM4-x18DPQYF9__Xb4pz_VQIFPGGnoISoJZrmadm5lrXhACfsRc43nKNSSjxnJwJQG2vtKbtYURpiN_xqpyGOVeyrVbiLO5rS4POH6ipX6y0lqtqxWu6nYdeGavmTUohtV63SMPphH-jjS_asb0OmV_fzjK0_X6wXl_X18svV4tN17WWjoN5o9MJ4a0gZZXuwWndSWC-0AOmRA_XCNp3qqfG60QUj3IjOA2nw2ooz9u5ou0_xx0x5crshewqhHSnO2SEqRFOe1wV9-wi9iXMay3EOVaO4AWmgUPJI-RRzTtS7fSo_pjsH3B1SdiVl9zjlIntzbz5vdtT9ET3EWgBzBG5jmCjl72G-peS21IZp-z9v-Q8p54ASG1MjR4CDqD40FL8BPleV7Q</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Lievens, Maarten</creator><creator>Bourgois, Jan G.</creator><creator>Boone, Jan</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Periodization of Plyometrics: Is There an Optimal Overload Principle?</title><author>Lievens, Maarten ; Bourgois, Jan G. ; Boone, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4751-b62c38c98e5859f1966d439c36314c201ef397d5fe7c6768e5e2b3dc1e61c693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chronic effects</topic><topic>Exercise intensity</topic><topic>Jumping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lievens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourgois, Jan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boone, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lievens, Maarten</au><au>Bourgois, Jan G.</au><au>Boone, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periodization of Plyometrics: Is There an Optimal Overload Principle?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2669</spage><epage>2676</epage><pages>2669-2676</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTLievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Periodization of plyometricsIs there an optimal overload principle? J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—This study investigated the acute and chronic effects of 3 plyometric training (PT) programs with equal training loads (intensity × volume × frequency) on speed, agility, and jumping performance. Forty-four male recreational team sport athletes were either assigned to a program that increased training volume with exercises of mixed intensity (Mix), kept training volume equal and increased exercise intensity (LowHi), increased training volume and kept exercise intensity low (Low), or to a control group (Control). Subjects were trained twice a week for 8 weeks and were tested for 5- (5 m) and 10-m sprint (10 m), 5 × 10-m shuttle run (5 × 10 m), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump without and with arm swing, and standing broad jump. Five-, 10- and 5 × 10-m performance did not change (p &gt; 0.05) after the PT program. Jumping performance, except for SJ (p = 0.114), improved significantly (p &lt; 0.05) in the PT groups compared with the control group. However, no mutual differences (p &lt; 0.05) were established between plyometric groups. In addition, it was shown that a PT of high intensity was more likely to affect performance and blood inflammation markers in the following days. To conclude, PT programs following a different overload pattern, i.e., different combination of volume and intensity, but equal training load showed similar performance effects in recreationally trained men. However, before competition, a PT of low intensity is preferred over a PT of high intensity to avoid a decline in performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>31268999</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003231</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2669-2676
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2252284286
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Chronic effects
Exercise intensity
Jumping
title Periodization of Plyometrics: Is There an Optimal Overload Principle?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periodization%20of%20Plyometrics:%20Is%20There%20an%20Optimal%20Overload%20Principle?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Lievens,%20Maarten&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2669&rft.epage=2676&rft.pages=2669-2676&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003231&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575081481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4751-b62c38c98e5859f1966d439c36314c201ef397d5fe7c6768e5e2b3dc1e61c693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575081481&rft_id=info:pmid/31268999&rfr_iscdi=true