Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028)

AbstractObjectiveWe compared two groups of early stage cervical cancer patients treated with different surgical methods without adjuvant treatment using retrospective multicenter data previously collected for Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) study designed for developing prognostic models. M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gynecologic oncology 2019-09, Vol.154 (3), p.547-553
Main Authors: Paik, E Sun, Lim, Myong Cheol, Kim, Moon-Hong, Kim, Yun Hwan, Song, Eun Seop, Seong, Seok Ju, Suh, Dong Hoon, Lee, Jong-Min, Lee, Chulmin, Choi, Chel Hun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine
Minimal invasive surgery
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prognoses
Survival analyses
Uterine cervical neoplasms
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AbstractObjectiveWe compared two groups of early stage cervical cancer patients treated with different surgical methods without adjuvant treatment using retrospective multicenter data previously collected for Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) study designed for developing prognostic models. MethodWe initially assessed data from the multi-institutional cohort with early stage (IB-IIA) cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy without adjuvant treatment between 2000 and 2008. Propensity score matching was performed to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with laparoscopic to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Additionally, survival comparison was performed in patients with tumor size
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.023