Loading…
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study
The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking...
Saved in:
Published in: | Law and human behavior 2019-08, Vol.43 (4), p.319-328 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 328 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | Law and human behavior |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Rosenfeld, Barry Galietta, Michele Foellmi, Melodie Coupland, Sarah Turner, Zoe Stern, Stephanie Wijetunga, Charity Gerbrandij, Jacomina Ivanoff, Andre |
description | The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear.
Public Significance Statement
This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/lhb0000336 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253838662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2242420942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgit1Wb_wBEvCmVUYzc2YyGe_arVqhULAreBfOJGfcqZkPk4yw_nqzbFVocpEQnhyS9zD2IhdvcwH1O7dtRRoA8hFb5VUNmZT5t8dsJfKyzmoQ9RE7DuEumUaJ6ik7grwQpYJixfrLHh2Z2Bt0_IK2-KufPN9syeO846eXF5sz3qWTuCW-8YRxoDHyqeO3Ed2PfvzOb7qORks-vOfn_AuOdhr632T5ehqjn5xL29u42N0z9qRDF-j5_XrCvn78sFlfZdc3nz6vz68zBFXHzFrZAhA2RkpViUKSLCXYWpEkUxYqT3-tDUCjVIuksFVYkrJFgdAR2ApO2Omh7uynnwuFqIc-GHIOR5qWoIuiAgVKyiLRVw_o3bT4Mb0uqTJN0ZR79fqgjJ9C8NTp2fcD-p3Ohd43QP9vQMIv70su7UD2H_2beAJvDgBn1HPYGfQpfEfBLN6nbPfFdAm6TFca-AOtS48A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2242420942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><creator>Rosenfeld, Barry ; Galietta, Michele ; Foellmi, Melodie ; Coupland, Sarah ; Turner, Zoe ; Stern, Stephanie ; Wijetunga, Charity ; Gerbrandij, Jacomina ; Ivanoff, Andre</creator><contributor>McAuliff, Bradley D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Barry ; Galietta, Michele ; Foellmi, Melodie ; Coupland, Sarah ; Turner, Zoe ; Stern, Stephanie ; Wijetunga, Charity ; Gerbrandij, Jacomina ; Ivanoff, Andre ; McAuliff, Bradley D</creatorcontrib><description>The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear.
Public Significance Statement
This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31204832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anger Control ; Anger Management Therapy ; Behavior ; Criminal Offenders ; Dialectical Behavior Therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Human ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New York - epidemiology ; Personality Disorders - therapy ; Recidivism ; Recidivism - statistics & numerical data ; Self Report ; Stalking ; Stalking - therapy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 2019-08, Vol.43 (4), p.319-328</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31204832$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McAuliff, Bradley D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galietta, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foellmi, Melodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijetunga, Charity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanoff, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><description>The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear.
Public Significance Statement
This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anger Control</subject><subject>Anger Management Therapy</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Dialectical Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New York - epidemiology</subject><subject>Personality Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Recidivism - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Stalking</subject><subject>Stalking - therapy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgit1Wb_wBEvCmVUYzc2YyGe_arVqhULAreBfOJGfcqZkPk4yw_nqzbFVocpEQnhyS9zD2IhdvcwH1O7dtRRoA8hFb5VUNmZT5t8dsJfKyzmoQ9RE7DuEumUaJ6ik7grwQpYJixfrLHh2Z2Bt0_IK2-KufPN9syeO846eXF5sz3qWTuCW-8YRxoDHyqeO3Ed2PfvzOb7qORks-vOfn_AuOdhr632T5ehqjn5xL29u42N0z9qRDF-j5_XrCvn78sFlfZdc3nz6vz68zBFXHzFrZAhA2RkpViUKSLCXYWpEkUxYqT3-tDUCjVIuksFVYkrJFgdAR2ApO2Omh7uynnwuFqIc-GHIOR5qWoIuiAgVKyiLRVw_o3bT4Mb0uqTJN0ZR79fqgjJ9C8NTp2fcD-p3Ohd43QP9vQMIv70su7UD2H_2beAJvDgBn1HPYGfQpfEfBLN6nbPfFdAm6TFca-AOtS48A</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Rosenfeld, Barry</creator><creator>Galietta, Michele</creator><creator>Foellmi, Melodie</creator><creator>Coupland, Sarah</creator><creator>Turner, Zoe</creator><creator>Stern, Stephanie</creator><creator>Wijetunga, Charity</creator><creator>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</creator><creator>Ivanoff, Andre</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><author>Rosenfeld, Barry ; Galietta, Michele ; Foellmi, Melodie ; Coupland, Sarah ; Turner, Zoe ; Stern, Stephanie ; Wijetunga, Charity ; Gerbrandij, Jacomina ; Ivanoff, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anger Control</topic><topic>Anger Management Therapy</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Dialectical Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New York - epidemiology</topic><topic>Personality Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Recidivism - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Stalking</topic><topic>Stalking - therapy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galietta, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foellmi, Melodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijetunga, Charity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanoff, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenfeld, Barry</au><au>Galietta, Michele</au><au>Foellmi, Melodie</au><au>Coupland, Sarah</au><au>Turner, Zoe</au><au>Stern, Stephanie</au><au>Wijetunga, Charity</au><au>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</au><au>Ivanoff, Andre</au><au>McAuliff, Bradley D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>319-328</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><abstract>The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear.
Public Significance Statement
This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>31204832</pmid><doi>10.1037/lhb0000336</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-7307 |
ispartof | Law and human behavior, 2019-08, Vol.43 (4), p.319-328 |
issn | 0147-7307 1573-661X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253838662 |
source | PsycArticles (EBSCO) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Anger Control Anger Management Therapy Behavior Criminal Offenders Dialectical Behavior Therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Human Humans Intervention Male Middle Aged New York - epidemiology Personality Disorders - therapy Recidivism Recidivism - statistics & numerical data Self Report Stalking Stalking - therapy Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation Young Adult |
title | Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A52%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dialectical%20Behavior%20Therapy%20(DBT)%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Stalking%20Offenders:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Rosenfeld,%20Barry&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=319-328&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/lhb0000336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2242420942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2242420942&rft_id=info:pmid/31204832&rfr_iscdi=true |