Loading…

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study

The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law and human behavior 2019-08, Vol.43 (4), p.319-328
Main Authors: Rosenfeld, Barry, Galietta, Michele, Foellmi, Melodie, Coupland, Sarah, Turner, Zoe, Stern, Stephanie, Wijetunga, Charity, Gerbrandij, Jacomina, Ivanoff, Andre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53
cites
container_end_page 328
container_issue 4
container_start_page 319
container_title Law and human behavior
container_volume 43
creator Rosenfeld, Barry
Galietta, Michele
Foellmi, Melodie
Coupland, Sarah
Turner, Zoe
Stern, Stephanie
Wijetunga, Charity
Gerbrandij, Jacomina
Ivanoff, Andre
description The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/lhb0000336
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253838662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2242420942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgit1Wb_wBEvCmVUYzc2YyGe_arVqhULAreBfOJGfcqZkPk4yw_nqzbFVocpEQnhyS9zD2IhdvcwH1O7dtRRoA8hFb5VUNmZT5t8dsJfKyzmoQ9RE7DuEumUaJ6ik7grwQpYJixfrLHh2Z2Bt0_IK2-KufPN9syeO846eXF5sz3qWTuCW-8YRxoDHyqeO3Ed2PfvzOb7qORks-vOfn_AuOdhr632T5ehqjn5xL29u42N0z9qRDF-j5_XrCvn78sFlfZdc3nz6vz68zBFXHzFrZAhA2RkpViUKSLCXYWpEkUxYqT3-tDUCjVIuksFVYkrJFgdAR2ApO2Omh7uynnwuFqIc-GHIOR5qWoIuiAgVKyiLRVw_o3bT4Mb0uqTJN0ZR79fqgjJ9C8NTp2fcD-p3Ohd43QP9vQMIv70su7UD2H_2beAJvDgBn1HPYGfQpfEfBLN6nbPfFdAm6TFca-AOtS48A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2242420942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><creator>Rosenfeld, Barry ; Galietta, Michele ; Foellmi, Melodie ; Coupland, Sarah ; Turner, Zoe ; Stern, Stephanie ; Wijetunga, Charity ; Gerbrandij, Jacomina ; Ivanoff, Andre</creator><contributor>McAuliff, Bradley D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Barry ; Galietta, Michele ; Foellmi, Melodie ; Coupland, Sarah ; Turner, Zoe ; Stern, Stephanie ; Wijetunga, Charity ; Gerbrandij, Jacomina ; Ivanoff, Andre ; McAuliff, Bradley D</creatorcontrib><description>The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31204832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anger Control ; Anger Management Therapy ; Behavior ; Criminal Offenders ; Dialectical Behavior Therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Human ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New York - epidemiology ; Personality Disorders - therapy ; Recidivism ; Recidivism - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Self Report ; Stalking ; Stalking - therapy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 2019-08, Vol.43 (4), p.319-328</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31204832$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McAuliff, Bradley D</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galietta, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foellmi, Melodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijetunga, Charity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanoff, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><description>The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anger Control</subject><subject>Anger Management Therapy</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Dialectical Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New York - epidemiology</subject><subject>Personality Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Recidivism - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Stalking</subject><subject>Stalking - therapy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0V1rFDEUBuAgit1Wb_wBEvCmVUYzc2YyGe_arVqhULAreBfOJGfcqZkPk4yw_nqzbFVocpEQnhyS9zD2IhdvcwH1O7dtRRoA8hFb5VUNmZT5t8dsJfKyzmoQ9RE7DuEumUaJ6ik7grwQpYJixfrLHh2Z2Bt0_IK2-KufPN9syeO846eXF5sz3qWTuCW-8YRxoDHyqeO3Ed2PfvzOb7qORks-vOfn_AuOdhr632T5ehqjn5xL29u42N0z9qRDF-j5_XrCvn78sFlfZdc3nz6vz68zBFXHzFrZAhA2RkpViUKSLCXYWpEkUxYqT3-tDUCjVIuksFVYkrJFgdAR2ApO2Omh7uynnwuFqIc-GHIOR5qWoIuiAgVKyiLRVw_o3bT4Mb0uqTJN0ZR79fqgjJ9C8NTp2fcD-p3Ohd43QP9vQMIv70su7UD2H_2beAJvDgBn1HPYGfQpfEfBLN6nbPfFdAm6TFca-AOtS48A</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Rosenfeld, Barry</creator><creator>Galietta, Michele</creator><creator>Foellmi, Melodie</creator><creator>Coupland, Sarah</creator><creator>Turner, Zoe</creator><creator>Stern, Stephanie</creator><creator>Wijetunga, Charity</creator><creator>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</creator><creator>Ivanoff, Andre</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><author>Rosenfeld, Barry ; Galietta, Michele ; Foellmi, Melodie ; Coupland, Sarah ; Turner, Zoe ; Stern, Stephanie ; Wijetunga, Charity ; Gerbrandij, Jacomina ; Ivanoff, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anger Control</topic><topic>Anger Management Therapy</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Dialectical Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New York - epidemiology</topic><topic>Personality Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Recidivism - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Stalking</topic><topic>Stalking - therapy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galietta, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foellmi, Melodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coupland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijetunga, Charity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanoff, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenfeld, Barry</au><au>Galietta, Michele</au><au>Foellmi, Melodie</au><au>Coupland, Sarah</au><au>Turner, Zoe</au><au>Stern, Stephanie</au><au>Wijetunga, Charity</au><au>Gerbrandij, Jacomina</au><au>Ivanoff, Andre</au><au>McAuliff, Bradley D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>319-328</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><abstract>The objective was to evaluate the relative efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy modified for stalking offenders (DBT-S) versus a cognitive-behavioral anger management intervention for the treatment of stalking offenders. We expected DBT to result in significantly lower rates of renewed stalking behavior and significantly greater improvements in impulsivity, aggression, anger, and empathy. We randomly assigned individuals charged with stalking-related offences (N = 109) to one of two study interventions: DBT-S and anger management. Recidivism (renewed stalking, violence, and other offences) was monitored for 1 year following the baseline assessment, and participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. We found relatively low rates of reoffence when compared to past studies of untreated stalking offenders in the U.S., but type of treatment had no impact on the likelihood of reoffence, nor did completion of the treatment program. Likewise, there was no between-groups difference in rates of treatment completion, or on changes in self-report measures. Intensive treatment focused on reducing problematic behaviors in stalking offenders may be effective regardless of treatment modality, but the mechanism by which treatment impacts criminal behavior is not yet clear. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrated that stalking recidivism and stalking-related violence can be reduced through effective intervention. However, the specific type of intervention used may be less important than the rigor of the intervention.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>31204832</pmid><doi>10.1037/lhb0000336</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-7307
ispartof Law and human behavior, 2019-08, Vol.43 (4), p.319-328
issn 0147-7307
1573-661X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253838662
source PsycArticles (EBSCO)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anger Control
Anger Management Therapy
Behavior
Criminal Offenders
Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Human
Humans
Intervention
Male
Middle Aged
New York - epidemiology
Personality Disorders - therapy
Recidivism
Recidivism - statistics & numerical data
Self Report
Stalking
Stalking - therapy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation
Young Adult
title Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for the Treatment of Stalking Offenders: A Randomized Controlled Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A52%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dialectical%20Behavior%20Therapy%20(DBT)%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Stalking%20Offenders:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Rosenfeld,%20Barry&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=319-328&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/lhb0000336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2242420942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-dd6b33ea9c6685026e6463d78e6ec4281b007c33988bae8ab8a4e8d22a3fe3d53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2242420942&rft_id=info:pmid/31204832&rfr_iscdi=true