Loading…
SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME
The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient am...
Saved in:
Published in: | WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2017-01, Vol.211, p.69 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment |
container_volume | 211 |
creator | SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA Tyrrel, Sean COULON, FRÉDÉRIC |
description | The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (>50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3). |
doi_str_mv | 10.2495/AIR170071 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2256164132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2256164132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jE9LwzAchoMoOOYOfoMcvVTz59em9Ra7rgbSprSdipeRNQkMqlO7fX-HiqfnheflQeiaklsGWXwnVUsFIYKeoRkVwCMeAz3_2UkEkL5cosU07bYEYk5jzsgMvXayarSqS1ypvDUPSmr8ZLTslS6waUtZqxznpmrMul5299g0vapUd_KmxmaFV9o841b2BZb1Ev_HTqfiCl0EO05-8cc5Wq-KPn-MtClVLnU0sIQfoq21LCWQeOoGG4gXA80gjV0mAifBZ6kD5hIXwDMnLHUQKGRBbEWwIrgs8Dm6-e1-fO0_j346bN520-DH0b77_XHaMBYnNAHKGf8GQ3xOqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256164132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA ; Tyrrel, Sean ; COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creator><creatorcontrib>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA ; Tyrrel, Sean ; COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (>50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-448X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-3541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2495/AIR170071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Southampton: W I T Press</publisher><subject>Acetone ; Air pumps ; Air quality ; Air sampling ; Airborne microorganisms ; Bioaerosols ; Chemical fingerprinting ; Collection ; Contamination ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Indoor environments ; Ketones ; Microorganisms ; Optimization ; Organic chemistry ; Organic compounds ; Sampling methods ; Tubes ; Urban agriculture ; VOCs ; Volatile compounds ; Volatile organic compounds ; Volatiles ; Wastewater treatment plants</subject><ispartof>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2017-01, Vol.211, p.69</ispartof><rights>2017. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.witpress.com/elibrary .</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2256164132?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25754,27924,27925,37013,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrel, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creatorcontrib><title>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</title><title>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</title><description>The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (>50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3).</description><subject>Acetone</subject><subject>Air pumps</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Air sampling</subject><subject>Airborne microorganisms</subject><subject>Bioaerosols</subject><subject>Chemical fingerprinting</subject><subject>Collection</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><issn>1746-448X</issn><issn>1743-3541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jE9LwzAchoMoOOYOfoMcvVTz59em9Ra7rgbSprSdipeRNQkMqlO7fX-HiqfnheflQeiaklsGWXwnVUsFIYKeoRkVwCMeAz3_2UkEkL5cosU07bYEYk5jzsgMvXayarSqS1ypvDUPSmr8ZLTslS6waUtZqxznpmrMul5299g0vapUd_KmxmaFV9o841b2BZb1Ev_HTqfiCl0EO05-8cc5Wq-KPn-MtClVLnU0sIQfoq21LCWQeOoGG4gXA80gjV0mAifBZ6kD5hIXwDMnLHUQKGRBbEWwIrgs8Dm6-e1-fO0_j346bN520-DH0b77_XHaMBYnNAHKGf8GQ3xOqg</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</creator><creator>Tyrrel, Sean</creator><creator>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creator><general>W I T Press</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</title><author>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA ; Tyrrel, Sean ; COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acetone</topic><topic>Air pumps</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Air sampling</topic><topic>Airborne microorganisms</topic><topic>Bioaerosols</topic><topic>Chemical fingerprinting</topic><topic>Collection</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrel, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</au><au>Tyrrel, Sean</au><au>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</atitle><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>211</volume><spage>69</spage><pages>69-</pages><issn>1746-448X</issn><eissn>1743-3541</eissn><abstract>The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (>50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3).</abstract><cop>Southampton</cop><pub>W I T Press</pub><doi>10.2495/AIR170071</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-448X |
ispartof | WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2017-01, Vol.211, p.69 |
issn | 1746-448X 1743-3541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2256164132 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Acetone Air pumps Air quality Air sampling Airborne microorganisms Bioaerosols Chemical fingerprinting Collection Contamination Environmental impact Environmental policy Flow rates Flow velocity Indoor environments Ketones Microorganisms Optimization Organic chemistry Organic compounds Sampling methods Tubes Urban agriculture VOCs Volatile compounds Volatile organic compounds Volatiles Wastewater treatment plants |
title | SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A31%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAMPLING%20MICROBIAL%20VOLATILE%20ORGANIC%20COMPOUNDS:%20OPTIMISATION%20OF%20FLOW%20RATE%20AND%20SAMPLING%20TIME&rft.jtitle=WIT%20Transactions%20on%20Ecology%20and%20the%20Environment&rft.au=SONIA%20GARC%C3%8DA%20ALCEGA&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=211&rft.spage=69&rft.pages=69-&rft.issn=1746-448X&rft.eissn=1743-3541&rft_id=info:doi/10.2495/AIR170071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2256164132%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256164132&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |