Loading…

SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME

The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient am...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2017-01, Vol.211, p.69
Main Authors: SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA, Tyrrel, Sean, COULON, FRÉDÉRIC
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 69
container_title WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
container_volume 211
creator SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA
Tyrrel, Sean
COULON, FRÉDÉRIC
description The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (>50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3).
doi_str_mv 10.2495/AIR170071
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2256164132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2256164132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jE9LwzAchoMoOOYOfoMcvVTz59em9Ra7rgbSprSdipeRNQkMqlO7fX-HiqfnheflQeiaklsGWXwnVUsFIYKeoRkVwCMeAz3_2UkEkL5cosU07bYEYk5jzsgMvXayarSqS1ypvDUPSmr8ZLTslS6waUtZqxznpmrMul5299g0vapUd_KmxmaFV9o841b2BZb1Ev_HTqfiCl0EO05-8cc5Wq-KPn-MtClVLnU0sIQfoq21LCWQeOoGG4gXA80gjV0mAifBZ6kD5hIXwDMnLHUQKGRBbEWwIrgs8Dm6-e1-fO0_j346bN520-DH0b77_XHaMBYnNAHKGf8GQ3xOqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2256164132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA ; Tyrrel, Sean ; COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creator><creatorcontrib>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA ; Tyrrel, Sean ; COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (&gt;50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-448X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-3541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2495/AIR170071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Southampton: W I T Press</publisher><subject>Acetone ; Air pumps ; Air quality ; Air sampling ; Airborne microorganisms ; Bioaerosols ; Chemical fingerprinting ; Collection ; Contamination ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Indoor environments ; Ketones ; Microorganisms ; Optimization ; Organic chemistry ; Organic compounds ; Sampling methods ; Tubes ; Urban agriculture ; VOCs ; Volatile compounds ; Volatile organic compounds ; Volatiles ; Wastewater treatment plants</subject><ispartof>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2017-01, Vol.211, p.69</ispartof><rights>2017. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.witpress.com/elibrary .</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2256164132?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25754,27924,27925,37013,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrel, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creatorcontrib><title>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</title><title>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</title><description>The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (&gt;50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3).</description><subject>Acetone</subject><subject>Air pumps</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Air sampling</subject><subject>Airborne microorganisms</subject><subject>Bioaerosols</subject><subject>Chemical fingerprinting</subject><subject>Collection</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><issn>1746-448X</issn><issn>1743-3541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jE9LwzAchoMoOOYOfoMcvVTz59em9Ra7rgbSprSdipeRNQkMqlO7fX-HiqfnheflQeiaklsGWXwnVUsFIYKeoRkVwCMeAz3_2UkEkL5cosU07bYEYk5jzsgMvXayarSqS1ypvDUPSmr8ZLTslS6waUtZqxznpmrMul5299g0vapUd_KmxmaFV9o841b2BZb1Ev_HTqfiCl0EO05-8cc5Wq-KPn-MtClVLnU0sIQfoq21LCWQeOoGG4gXA80gjV0mAifBZ6kD5hIXwDMnLHUQKGRBbEWwIrgs8Dm6-e1-fO0_j346bN520-DH0b77_XHaMBYnNAHKGf8GQ3xOqg</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</creator><creator>Tyrrel, Sean</creator><creator>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creator><general>W I T Press</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</title><author>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA ; Tyrrel, Sean ; COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acetone</topic><topic>Air pumps</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Air sampling</topic><topic>Airborne microorganisms</topic><topic>Bioaerosols</topic><topic>Chemical fingerprinting</topic><topic>Collection</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrel, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SONIA GARCÍA ALCEGA</au><au>Tyrrel, Sean</au><au>COULON, FRÉDÉRIC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME</atitle><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>211</volume><spage>69</spage><pages>69-</pages><issn>1746-448X</issn><eissn>1743-3541</eissn><abstract>The impact of bioaerosols emissions from urban, agricultural and industrial environments on local air quality is of growing policy concern. However, there is no standardised protocol established yet, despite a large number of bioaerosols sampling methods in use. Additionally, capturing sufficient amounts of material to allow reproducible separation and detection of molecular patterns is still difficult. Chemical fingerprint analysis of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) is a potentially rapid and reproducible approach for the early detection and identification of outdoor contamination as it has been shown to be a successful approach for indoor environments and it can be done on a fine-scale, allowing the identification of species-specific volatiles that may serve as marker compounds for the selective detection of pathogens. In this study we have tested the number and concentration of MVOCs collected using different sampling conditions: 10 min sampling time with variable flow rate (100, 500 and 1000 ml min–1) and 100 ml min–1 flow rate during 10, 20 and 30 min using Tenax®-Carbotrap thermal desorption (TD) tubes attached to portable GilAir® air pumps. Our aim was to determine the best sampling conditions in order to get enough material allowing reproducible data of the microbial markers present in outdoor environments. Substantial loses (&gt;50%) of MVOCs occurred when sampling at flow rates higher than 100 ml min–1. 10 min sampling time allowed the collection of most of the MVOCs present in the air (~96%). The optimal sampling settings that allowed the collection of higher concentrations of MVOCs without breakthrough was 10 min sampling at 100 ml min–1 flow rate. Ketones were the predominant group of MVOCs identified in the WWTP (34–42%), acetone being the compound present at higher concentration (6476–11731 ng m–3).</abstract><cop>Southampton</cop><pub>W I T Press</pub><doi>10.2495/AIR170071</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1746-448X
ispartof WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2017-01, Vol.211, p.69
issn 1746-448X
1743-3541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2256164132
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Acetone
Air pumps
Air quality
Air sampling
Airborne microorganisms
Bioaerosols
Chemical fingerprinting
Collection
Contamination
Environmental impact
Environmental policy
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Indoor environments
Ketones
Microorganisms
Optimization
Organic chemistry
Organic compounds
Sampling methods
Tubes
Urban agriculture
VOCs
Volatile compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Volatiles
Wastewater treatment plants
title SAMPLING MICROBIAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: OPTIMISATION OF FLOW RATE AND SAMPLING TIME
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A31%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAMPLING%20MICROBIAL%20VOLATILE%20ORGANIC%20COMPOUNDS:%20OPTIMISATION%20OF%20FLOW%20RATE%20AND%20SAMPLING%20TIME&rft.jtitle=WIT%20Transactions%20on%20Ecology%20and%20the%20Environment&rft.au=SONIA%20GARC%C3%8DA%20ALCEGA&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=211&rft.spage=69&rft.pages=69-&rft.issn=1746-448X&rft.eissn=1743-3541&rft_id=info:doi/10.2495/AIR170071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2256164132%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-baa28046e1dcaf0e7c19485d97f30fe98d42d6df4e2d7a1d4f149f7b7fa7fd9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2256164132&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true