Patient decision‐making in severe inflammatory bowel disease: the need for improved communication of treatment options and preferences

• Published in: Colorectal disease 2019-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1406-1414
• Main Authors: Lai, C., Sceats, L. A., Qiu, W., Park, K. T., Morris, A. M., Kin, C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: biologic medications; colectomy; Communication; Crohn's disease; Decision making; Health care facilities; Inflammatory bowel disease; Inflammatory bowel diseases; Intestine; Medical treatment; Patients; Social interactions; Surgery; ulcerative colitis
• ISSN: 1462-8910; 1463-1318
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.14759

Aim Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and their physicians must navigate ever‐increasing options for treatment. The aim of this study was to elucidate the key drivers of treatment decision‐making in inflammatory bowel disease. Methods We conducted qualitative semi‐structured in‐person interviews of 20 adult patients undergoing treatment for inflammatory bowel disease at an academic medical centre who either recently initiated biologic therapy or underwent an operation or surgical evaluation. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, iteratively coded, and discussed to consensus by five researchers. We used thematic analysis to explore factors influencing decision‐making. Results Four major themes emerged as key drivers of treatment decision‐making: perceived clinical state and disease severity, the patient–physician relationship, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about treatment options, and social isolation and stigma. Patients described experiencing a clinical turning point as the impetus for proceeding with a previously undesired treatment such as infusion medication or surgery. Patients reported delays in care or diagnosis, inadequate communication with their physicians, and lack of control over their disease management. Patients often stated that they considered surgery to be the treatment of last resort, which further compounded the complexity of making treatment decisions. Conclusion Patients described multiple barriers to making informed and collaborative decisions about treatment, especially when considering surgical options. Our study reveals a need for more comprehensive communication between the patient and their physician about the range of medical and surgical treatment options. We recommend a patient‐centred approach toward the decision‐making process that accounts for patient decision‐making preferences, causes of social stress, and clinical status.