Loading…
Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illness
To determine if the addition of lactate to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scoring improves emergency department (ED) screening of septic patients for critical illness. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital from the...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of emergency medicine 2020-05, Vol.38 (5), p.883-889 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8f127e5c5798c991c3c8080ab0d563c0cef39a493d44dc649f7a9f2ce9451cf43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8f127e5c5798c991c3c8080ab0d563c0cef39a493d44dc649f7a9f2ce9451cf43 |
container_end_page | 889 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 883 |
container_title | The American journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Baumann, Brigitte M. Greenwood, John C. Lewis, Kristin Nuckton, Thomas J. Darger, Bryan Shofer, Frances S. Troeger, Dawn Jung, Soo Y. Kilgannon, J. Hope Rodriguez, Robert M. |
description | To determine if the addition of lactate to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scoring improves emergency department (ED) screening of septic patients for critical illness.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital from the ED with infectious disease-related illnesses. We recorded qSOFA criteria and initial lactate levels in the first 6 h of ED stay. Our primary outcome was a composite of hospital death, vasopressor use, and intensive care unit stay ≤72 h of presentation. Diagnostic test characteristics were determined for: 1) lactate levels ≥2 and ≥4; 2) qSOFA scores ≥1, ≥2, and =3; and 3) combinations of these.
Of 3743 patients, 2584 had a lactate drawn ≤6 h of ED stay and 18% met the primary outcome. The qSOFA scores were ≥1, ≥2, and =3 in 59.2%, 22.0%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively, and 34.4% had a lactate level ≥2 and 7.9% had a lactate level ≥4. The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 had the highest sensitivity, 94.0% (95% CI: 91.3–95.9).
The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 provides substantially improved sensitivity for the screening of critical illness compared to isolated lactate and qSOFA thresholds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261233084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675719304504</els_id><sourcerecordid>2261233084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8f127e5c5798c991c3c8080ab0d563c0cef39a493d44dc649f7a9f2ce9451cf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT1vFDEQhi0EIsfBH6BAlmhodvHnehfRRCcCkSKlAGrLNzsLXnk_YvsO5d_jywUKCioX87yvR_MQ8pqzmjPevB9rN-JUC8a7mpmaMfmEbLiWomq54U_Jhhmpq8Zoc0FepDQyxrnS6jm5kFwKJrjakHW3THs_-_kHvft6e3VJIfqM0Tv6y-eftEyyd4EGB9llpAGPGNIHej2tcTliTxNExIf4MtCEa_ZAV5c9zjnRYYkPfR5KhQ9hxpRekmeDCwlfPb5b8v3q07fdl-rm9vP17vKmAtmqXLUDFwY1aNO10HUcJLSsZW7Pet1IYICD7JzqZK9UD43qBuO6QQB2SnMYlNySd-fesujdAVO2k0-AIbgZl0OyQjRcSMnaE_r2H3RcDnEu21mhhG50a8qfWyLOFMQlpYiDXaOfXLy3nNmTDzvakw978mGZscVHCb15rD7sJ-z_Rv4IKMDHM1DOikeP0SYoxwPsfUTItl_8__p_A9LZnD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425658756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illness</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Baumann, Brigitte M. ; Greenwood, John C. ; Lewis, Kristin ; Nuckton, Thomas J. ; Darger, Bryan ; Shofer, Frances S. ; Troeger, Dawn ; Jung, Soo Y. ; Kilgannon, J. Hope ; Rodriguez, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Brigitte M. ; Greenwood, John C. ; Lewis, Kristin ; Nuckton, Thomas J. ; Darger, Bryan ; Shofer, Frances S. ; Troeger, Dawn ; Jung, Soo Y. ; Kilgannon, J. Hope ; Rodriguez, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>To determine if the addition of lactate to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scoring improves emergency department (ED) screening of septic patients for critical illness.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital from the ED with infectious disease-related illnesses. We recorded qSOFA criteria and initial lactate levels in the first 6 h of ED stay. Our primary outcome was a composite of hospital death, vasopressor use, and intensive care unit stay ≤72 h of presentation. Diagnostic test characteristics were determined for: 1) lactate levels ≥2 and ≥4; 2) qSOFA scores ≥1, ≥2, and =3; and 3) combinations of these.
Of 3743 patients, 2584 had a lactate drawn ≤6 h of ED stay and 18% met the primary outcome. The qSOFA scores were ≥1, ≥2, and =3 in 59.2%, 22.0%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively, and 34.4% had a lactate level ≥2 and 7.9% had a lactate level ≥4. The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 had the highest sensitivity, 94.0% (95% CI: 91.3–95.9).
The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 provides substantially improved sensitivity for the screening of critical illness compared to isolated lactate and qSOFA thresholds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31320214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Emergency medical care ; Infectious diseases ; Intensive care ; intensive care units ; Lactic acid ; mass screening ; Mortality ; Patients ; Sepsis</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020-05, Vol.38 (5), p.883-889</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8f127e5c5798c991c3c8080ab0d563c0cef39a493d44dc649f7a9f2ce9451cf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8f127e5c5798c991c3c8080ab0d563c0cef39a493d44dc649f7a9f2ce9451cf43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8046-6227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31320214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Brigitte M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuckton, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darger, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shofer, Frances S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troeger, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Soo Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgannon, J. Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illness</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>To determine if the addition of lactate to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scoring improves emergency department (ED) screening of septic patients for critical illness.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital from the ED with infectious disease-related illnesses. We recorded qSOFA criteria and initial lactate levels in the first 6 h of ED stay. Our primary outcome was a composite of hospital death, vasopressor use, and intensive care unit stay ≤72 h of presentation. Diagnostic test characteristics were determined for: 1) lactate levels ≥2 and ≥4; 2) qSOFA scores ≥1, ≥2, and =3; and 3) combinations of these.
Of 3743 patients, 2584 had a lactate drawn ≤6 h of ED stay and 18% met the primary outcome. The qSOFA scores were ≥1, ≥2, and =3 in 59.2%, 22.0%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively, and 34.4% had a lactate level ≥2 and 7.9% had a lactate level ≥4. The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 had the highest sensitivity, 94.0% (95% CI: 91.3–95.9).
The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 provides substantially improved sensitivity for the screening of critical illness compared to isolated lactate and qSOFA thresholds.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>intensive care units</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>mass screening</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kT1vFDEQhi0EIsfBH6BAlmhodvHnehfRRCcCkSKlAGrLNzsLXnk_YvsO5d_jywUKCioX87yvR_MQ8pqzmjPevB9rN-JUC8a7mpmaMfmEbLiWomq54U_Jhhmpq8Zoc0FepDQyxrnS6jm5kFwKJrjakHW3THs_-_kHvft6e3VJIfqM0Tv6y-eftEyyd4EGB9llpAGPGNIHej2tcTliTxNExIf4MtCEa_ZAV5c9zjnRYYkPfR5KhQ9hxpRekmeDCwlfPb5b8v3q07fdl-rm9vP17vKmAtmqXLUDFwY1aNO10HUcJLSsZW7Pet1IYICD7JzqZK9UD43qBuO6QQB2SnMYlNySd-fesujdAVO2k0-AIbgZl0OyQjRcSMnaE_r2H3RcDnEu21mhhG50a8qfWyLOFMQlpYiDXaOfXLy3nNmTDzvakw978mGZscVHCb15rD7sJ-z_Rv4IKMDHM1DOikeP0SYoxwPsfUTItl_8__p_A9LZnD8</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Baumann, Brigitte M.</creator><creator>Greenwood, John C.</creator><creator>Lewis, Kristin</creator><creator>Nuckton, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Darger, Bryan</creator><creator>Shofer, Frances S.</creator><creator>Troeger, Dawn</creator><creator>Jung, Soo Y.</creator><creator>Kilgannon, J. Hope</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Robert M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8046-6227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illness</title><author>Baumann, Brigitte M. ; Greenwood, John C. ; Lewis, Kristin ; Nuckton, Thomas J. ; Darger, Bryan ; Shofer, Frances S. ; Troeger, Dawn ; Jung, Soo Y. ; Kilgannon, J. Hope ; Rodriguez, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8f127e5c5798c991c3c8080ab0d563c0cef39a493d44dc649f7a9f2ce9451cf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>intensive care units</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>mass screening</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumann, Brigitte M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuckton, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darger, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shofer, Frances S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troeger, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Soo Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgannon, J. Hope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumann, Brigitte M.</au><au>Greenwood, John C.</au><au>Lewis, Kristin</au><au>Nuckton, Thomas J.</au><au>Darger, Bryan</au><au>Shofer, Frances S.</au><au>Troeger, Dawn</au><au>Jung, Soo Y.</au><au>Kilgannon, J. Hope</au><au>Rodriguez, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illness</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>883-889</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>To determine if the addition of lactate to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scoring improves emergency department (ED) screening of septic patients for critical illness.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital from the ED with infectious disease-related illnesses. We recorded qSOFA criteria and initial lactate levels in the first 6 h of ED stay. Our primary outcome was a composite of hospital death, vasopressor use, and intensive care unit stay ≤72 h of presentation. Diagnostic test characteristics were determined for: 1) lactate levels ≥2 and ≥4; 2) qSOFA scores ≥1, ≥2, and =3; and 3) combinations of these.
Of 3743 patients, 2584 had a lactate drawn ≤6 h of ED stay and 18% met the primary outcome. The qSOFA scores were ≥1, ≥2, and =3 in 59.2%, 22.0%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively, and 34.4% had a lactate level ≥2 and 7.9% had a lactate level ≥4. The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 had the highest sensitivity, 94.0% (95% CI: 91.3–95.9).
The combination of qSOFA ≥1 OR Lactate ≥2 provides substantially improved sensitivity for the screening of critical illness compared to isolated lactate and qSOFA thresholds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31320214</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8046-6227</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-6757 |
ispartof | The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020-05, Vol.38 (5), p.883-889 |
issn | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261233084 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Emergency medical care Infectious diseases Intensive care intensive care units Lactic acid mass screening Mortality Patients Sepsis |
title | Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illness |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20qSOFA%20criteria%20with%20initial%20lactate%20levels:%20Improved%20screening%20of%20septic%20patients%20for%20critical%20illness&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Baumann,%20Brigitte%20M.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=883-889&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261233084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-8f127e5c5798c991c3c8080ab0d563c0cef39a493d44dc649f7a9f2ce9451cf43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425658756&rft_id=info:pmid/31320214&rfr_iscdi=true |