Loading…

Verapamil and Cluster Headache: Still a Mystery. A Narrative Review of Efficacy, Mechanisms and Perspectives

Objective A evaluation of the effect of verapamil and other calcium channel blockers in cluster headache (CH) treatment and an investigation of possible effect mechanisms. Background Verapamil has been used in the prevention of CH for almost 3 decades, however, the mode of action and therapeutic tar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Headache 2019-09, Vol.59 (8), p.1198-1211
Main Authors: Petersen, Anja S., Barloese, Mads C. J., Snoer, Agneta, Soerensen, Anne Mette S., Jensen, Rigmor H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective A evaluation of the effect of verapamil and other calcium channel blockers in cluster headache (CH) treatment and an investigation of possible effect mechanisms. Background Verapamil has been used in the prevention of CH for almost 3 decades, however, the mode of action and therapeutic target is still unknown. Methods A Pubmed search was conducted: “Verapamil”[Mesh] and “Cluster Headache”[Mesh]. We identified 5 relevant studies for CH. Publications were included if they made a substantial contribution within 3 prespecified areas: Efficacy (randomized controlled‐trials or open labels studies), safety, and mechanism of effect. Results Clinical effect: Clinical preventive treatment of CH with verapamil is based on 2 randomized controlled studies and 3 open‐label studies. In total, 183 CH patients participated. Verapamil 360 mg/day was used in both controlled studies. Half of the chronic patients experienced benefit from verapamil treatment and the attack burden of episodic patients was, on average, reduced by 1 attack/day. Open‐label studies support a dose‐dependent level of efficacy. Mechanism of effect: Human and animal studies indicate that verapamil may exert its effect by modulating circadian rhythms, perhaps in central pacemakers, and/or by affecting release of calcitonin gene‐related peptide. Conclusion Verapamil appears to be an effective prophylactic drug in the treatment of CH and despite the scarcity of controlled trials, it is still the drug of choice. A chronotherapeutic approach might increase the effect. More basic and pharmacokinetic research is needed before the mechanism can be fully understood.
ISSN:0017-8748
1526-4610
DOI:10.1111/head.13603