Loading…
MAP(ASH): A new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Background and Aim Risk stratification for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is recommended. However, scoring system accuracy is suboptimal, and score calculation can be complex. Our aim was to develop a new score, the MAP(ASH) score, with information available in the emergency room and to vali...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2020-01, Vol.35 (1), p.82-89 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background and Aim
Risk stratification for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is recommended. However, scoring system accuracy is suboptimal, and score calculation can be complex. Our aim was to develop a new score, the MAP(ASH) score, with information available in the emergency room and to validate it.
Methods
The score was built from a prospective database of patients with UGIB and validated in an international database of 3012 patients from six hospitals. Outcomes were 30‐day mortality, endoscopic intervention, any intervention (red blood transfusion, endoscopic treatment, interventional radiology, surgery, or death), and rebleeding. Accuracy to predict outcomes was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results
Five hundred forty‐seven patients were included in the development cohort. Impaired mental status, albumin 100, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, systolic blood pressure |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.14811 |