Loading…

Quantitative assessment of the conjunctival microcirculation using a smartphone and slit-lamp biomicroscope

The conjunctival microcirculation is a readily-accessible vascular bed for quantitative haemodynamic assessment and has been studied previously using a digital charge-coupled device (CCD). Smartphone video imaging of the conjunctiva, and haemodynamic parameter quantification, represents a novel appr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microvascular research 2019-11, Vol.126, p.103907-103907, Article 103907
Main Authors: Brennan, Paul F., McNeil, Andrew J., Jing, Min, Awuah, Agnes, Finlay, Dewar D., Blighe, Kevin, McLaughlin, James A.D., Wang, Ruixuan, Moore, Jonathan, Nesbit, M. Andrew, Trucco, Emanuele, Spence, Mark S., Moore, Tara C.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The conjunctival microcirculation is a readily-accessible vascular bed for quantitative haemodynamic assessment and has been studied previously using a digital charge-coupled device (CCD). Smartphone video imaging of the conjunctiva, and haemodynamic parameter quantification, represents a novel approach. We report the feasibility of smartphone video acquisition and subsequent haemodynamic measure quantification via semi-automated means. Using an Apple iPhone 6 s and a Topcon SL-D4 slit-lamp biomicroscope, we obtained videos of the conjunctival microcirculation in 4 fields of view per patient, for 17 low cardiovascular risk patients. After image registration and processing, we quantified the diameter, mean axial velocity, mean blood volume flow, and wall shear rate for each vessel studied. Vessels were grouped into quartiles based on their diameter i.e. group 1 (22 μm). From the 17 healthy controls (mean QRISK3 6.6%), we obtained quantifiable haemodynamics from 626 vessel segments. The mean diameter of microvessels, across all sites, was 21.1μm (range 5.8–58 μm). Mean axial velocity was 0.50mm/s (range 0.11–1mm/s) and there was a modestly positive correlation (r 0.322) seen with increasing diameter, best appreciated when comparing group 4 to the remaining groups (p 
ISSN:0026-2862
1095-9319
DOI:10.1016/j.mvr.2019.103907