Letters of Recommendation

• Published in: The Journal of emergency medicine 2019-09, Vol.57 (3), p.405-410
• Main Authors: Garmel, Gus M, Grover, Casey A, Quinn, Antonia, Lotfipour, Shahram, Langdorf, Mark I, Cheaito, Mohamad Ali, Epter, Michael, Kazzi, Amin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0736-4679
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.04.020

Letters of recommendation (LORs) are a central element of an applicant's portfolio for the National Resident Matching Program (known as the "Match"). This is especially true when applying to competitive specialties like emergency medicine (EM). LORs convey an applicant's potential for success, and also highlight an applicant's qualities that cannot always be recognized from a curriculum vitae, test scores, or grades. Traditional LORs, also called narrative LORs, are written in prose and are therefore highly subjective. This led to the establishment of a task force by the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors in 1995 to develop a standardized LOR. Revisions of this form are now referred to as a standardized letter of evaluation. These evaluations in this format have proven to increase inter-rater reliability, decrease interpretation time, and standardize the process used by EM faculty to prepare evaluations for EM applicants. In this article, we will discuss LORs; address applicants' concerns, including from whom to request LORs (EM faculty vs. non-EM faculty vs. non-clinical faculty), number of LORs an applicant should include in his or her application materials, the preferred manner of requesting and the timing in which to ask for an LOR, as well as the philosophy behind waiving the right to see the letter.