Loading…

Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: A Study of Employee Attributions of Supervisor Justice Motives

A large body of research demonstrates that employee perceptions of fair treatment matter. The overwhelming focus of these investigations has been on how employees react to whether or not they perceive their supervisor behaved in a fair manner. We contend, however, that employees not only question an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2020-03, Vol.105 (3), p.274-293
Main Authors: Matta, Fadel K, Sabey, Tyler B, Scott, Brent A, Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna), Koopman, Joel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-cbf612ca86e86ab46ea1b7047afcff12faa03375b60228a9cfa6922e7c94ded23
cites
container_end_page 293
container_issue 3
container_start_page 274
container_title Journal of applied psychology
container_volume 105
creator Matta, Fadel K
Sabey, Tyler B
Scott, Brent A
Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna)
Koopman, Joel
description A large body of research demonstrates that employee perceptions of fair treatment matter. The overwhelming focus of these investigations has been on how employees react to whether or not they perceive their supervisor behaved in a fair manner. We contend, however, that employees not only question and react to whether they are treated fairly, but also to why they believe their supervisor acted fairly in the first place. To do so, we consider how employee attributions of supervisor motives for fair treatment influence the cognitive and affective mechanisms by which fair treatment influences employee reactions to fairness. Drawing from the justice actor model, we focus on both cognitive (establishing fairness, identity maintenance, and effecting compliance) and affective (positive affect) motives underlying supervisors' fair treatment. Relying on theory and research on motive attribution and leader affect, we develop predictions for how employees' perceptions of these motives as a result of short-term exchanges over time influence supervisor-directed citizenship behavior through both cognitive (trust in the supervisor) and affective (positive affect) mechanisms. Our experience sampling study of 613 weekly fair events (from 171 employees) largely supported our predictions, demonstrating that attribution of supervisor motives is a meaningful component of an employee's justice experience.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/apl0000440
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268573216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268573216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-cbf612ca86e86ab46ea1b7047afcff12faa03375b60228a9cfa6922e7c94ded23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhhtRzCZ68QdIgxcJTuyPme4Zb8uyiZFED9FzU9NTAxN6pyf9Edh_n142KniwLnWoh4eXegl5x9kFZ1J_hsWxMnXNXpAV72RX8bapX5IVY4JXHePshJzGeM8Yr2XHXpMTyWXLlGpXBL77RNfO0UuYwowx0utINwEh4UC3DxncF7qmdykPe-pHut0tzu8R6TqlMPU5TX6Oh8NdXjA8TtEH-i3HNFmktz5NjxjfkFcjuIhvn_cZ-XW5_bn5Wt38uLrerG8qKFlSZftRcWGhVdgq6GuFwHvNag2jHUcuRgAmpW56xYRoobMjqE4I1LarBxyEPCMfj94l-IeMMZndFC06BzP6HI0Qqm20FFwV9MM_6L3PYS7pjJCqfK1h9f-p4pJaaHagzo-UDT7GgKNZwrSDsDecmUM95m89BX7_rMz9Doc_6O8-CvDpCMACZol7C6H80mG0OQSc00FWrI2RRuhaPgGd55jX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268372706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: A Study of Employee Attributions of Supervisor Justice Motives</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Matta, Fadel K ; Sabey, Tyler B ; Scott, Brent A ; Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna) ; Koopman, Joel</creator><contributor>Eby, Lillian T ; Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Matta, Fadel K ; Sabey, Tyler B ; Scott, Brent A ; Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna) ; Koopman, Joel ; Eby, Lillian T ; Chen, Gilad</creatorcontrib><description>A large body of research demonstrates that employee perceptions of fair treatment matter. The overwhelming focus of these investigations has been on how employees react to whether or not they perceive their supervisor behaved in a fair manner. We contend, however, that employees not only question and react to whether they are treated fairly, but also to why they believe their supervisor acted fairly in the first place. To do so, we consider how employee attributions of supervisor motives for fair treatment influence the cognitive and affective mechanisms by which fair treatment influences employee reactions to fairness. Drawing from the justice actor model, we focus on both cognitive (establishing fairness, identity maintenance, and effecting compliance) and affective (positive affect) motives underlying supervisors' fair treatment. Relying on theory and research on motive attribution and leader affect, we develop predictions for how employees' perceptions of these motives as a result of short-term exchanges over time influence supervisor-directed citizenship behavior through both cognitive (trust in the supervisor) and affective (positive affect) mechanisms. Our experience sampling study of 613 weekly fair events (from 171 employees) largely supported our predictions, demonstrating that attribution of supervisor motives is a meaningful component of an employee's justice experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/apl0000440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31380668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attribution ; Citizenship ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Compliance ; Ecological momentary assessment ; Employee Attitudes ; Employees ; Fairness ; Female ; Human ; Identity ; Justice ; Male ; Management Personnel ; Motivation ; Negative Emotions ; Perceptions ; Positive Emotions ; Supervisor Employee Interaction ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2020-03, Vol.105 (3), p.274-293</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-cbf612ca86e86ab46ea1b7047afcff12faa03375b60228a9cfa6922e7c94ded23</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-2056-0139</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,33202</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31380668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Eby, Lillian T</contributor><contributor>Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Matta, Fadel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabey, Tyler B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Brent A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopman, Joel</creatorcontrib><title>Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: A Study of Employee Attributions of Supervisor Justice Motives</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>A large body of research demonstrates that employee perceptions of fair treatment matter. The overwhelming focus of these investigations has been on how employees react to whether or not they perceive their supervisor behaved in a fair manner. We contend, however, that employees not only question and react to whether they are treated fairly, but also to why they believe their supervisor acted fairly in the first place. To do so, we consider how employee attributions of supervisor motives for fair treatment influence the cognitive and affective mechanisms by which fair treatment influences employee reactions to fairness. Drawing from the justice actor model, we focus on both cognitive (establishing fairness, identity maintenance, and effecting compliance) and affective (positive affect) motives underlying supervisors' fair treatment. Relying on theory and research on motive attribution and leader affect, we develop predictions for how employees' perceptions of these motives as a result of short-term exchanges over time influence supervisor-directed citizenship behavior through both cognitive (trust in the supervisor) and affective (positive affect) mechanisms. Our experience sampling study of 613 weekly fair events (from 171 employees) largely supported our predictions, demonstrating that attribution of supervisor motives is a meaningful component of an employee's justice experience.</description><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Ecological momentary assessment</subject><subject>Employee Attitudes</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management Personnel</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Negative Emotions</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Positive Emotions</subject><subject>Supervisor Employee Interaction</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhhtRzCZ68QdIgxcJTuyPme4Zb8uyiZFED9FzU9NTAxN6pyf9Edh_n142KniwLnWoh4eXegl5x9kFZ1J_hsWxMnXNXpAV72RX8bapX5IVY4JXHePshJzGeM8Yr2XHXpMTyWXLlGpXBL77RNfO0UuYwowx0utINwEh4UC3DxncF7qmdykPe-pHut0tzu8R6TqlMPU5TX6Oh8NdXjA8TtEH-i3HNFmktz5NjxjfkFcjuIhvn_cZ-XW5_bn5Wt38uLrerG8qKFlSZftRcWGhVdgq6GuFwHvNag2jHUcuRgAmpW56xYRoobMjqE4I1LarBxyEPCMfj94l-IeMMZndFC06BzP6HI0Qqm20FFwV9MM_6L3PYS7pjJCqfK1h9f-p4pJaaHagzo-UDT7GgKNZwrSDsDecmUM95m89BX7_rMz9Doc_6O8-CvDpCMACZol7C6H80mG0OQSc00FWrI2RRuhaPgGd55jX</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Matta, Fadel K</creator><creator>Sabey, Tyler B</creator><creator>Scott, Brent A</creator><creator>Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna)</creator><creator>Koopman, Joel</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-0139</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: A Study of Employee Attributions of Supervisor Justice Motives</title><author>Matta, Fadel K ; Sabey, Tyler B ; Scott, Brent A ; Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna) ; Koopman, Joel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-cbf612ca86e86ab46ea1b7047afcff12faa03375b60228a9cfa6922e7c94ded23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Ecological momentary assessment</topic><topic>Employee Attitudes</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management Personnel</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Negative Emotions</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Positive Emotions</topic><topic>Supervisor Employee Interaction</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matta, Fadel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabey, Tyler B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Brent A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopman, Joel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matta, Fadel K</au><au>Sabey, Tyler B</au><au>Scott, Brent A</au><au>Lin, Szu-Han (Joanna)</au><au>Koopman, Joel</au><au>Eby, Lillian T</au><au>Chen, Gilad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: A Study of Employee Attributions of Supervisor Justice Motives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>274-293</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>A large body of research demonstrates that employee perceptions of fair treatment matter. The overwhelming focus of these investigations has been on how employees react to whether or not they perceive their supervisor behaved in a fair manner. We contend, however, that employees not only question and react to whether they are treated fairly, but also to why they believe their supervisor acted fairly in the first place. To do so, we consider how employee attributions of supervisor motives for fair treatment influence the cognitive and affective mechanisms by which fair treatment influences employee reactions to fairness. Drawing from the justice actor model, we focus on both cognitive (establishing fairness, identity maintenance, and effecting compliance) and affective (positive affect) motives underlying supervisors' fair treatment. Relying on theory and research on motive attribution and leader affect, we develop predictions for how employees' perceptions of these motives as a result of short-term exchanges over time influence supervisor-directed citizenship behavior through both cognitive (trust in the supervisor) and affective (positive affect) mechanisms. Our experience sampling study of 613 weekly fair events (from 171 employees) largely supported our predictions, demonstrating that attribution of supervisor motives is a meaningful component of an employee's justice experience.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31380668</pmid><doi>10.1037/apl0000440</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-0139</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof Journal of applied psychology, 2020-03, Vol.105 (3), p.274-293
issn 0021-9010
1939-1854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268573216
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PsycARTICLES
subjects Attribution
Citizenship
Cognitive-behavioral factors
Compliance
Ecological momentary assessment
Employee Attitudes
Employees
Fairness
Female
Human
Identity
Justice
Male
Management Personnel
Motivation
Negative Emotions
Perceptions
Positive Emotions
Supervisor Employee Interaction
Supervisors
title Not All Fairness Is Created Equal: A Study of Employee Attributions of Supervisor Justice Motives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A29%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20All%20Fairness%20Is%20Created%20Equal:%20A%20Study%20of%20Employee%20Attributions%20of%20Supervisor%20Justice%20Motives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Matta,%20Fadel%20K&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=274-293&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/apl0000440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268573216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-cbf612ca86e86ab46ea1b7047afcff12faa03375b60228a9cfa6922e7c94ded23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268372706&rft_id=info:pmid/31380668&rfr_iscdi=true