Loading…

International review of national‐level guidelines on end‐of‐life care with focus on the withholding and withdrawing of artificial nutrition and hydration

Aim The purpose of the present study was to collate examples of end‐of‐life care guidelines from various counties, examine their contents, and gain an overall picture of how end‐of‐life care guidance is offered to physicians and care providers internationally. Methods In this study, eight researcher...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geriatrics & gerontology international 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.847-853
Main Authors: Mayers, Thomas, Kashiwagi, Shiho, Mathis, Bryan J., Kawabe, Makiko, Gallagher, Joshua, Morales Aliaga, Maria L., Kai, Ichiro, Tamiya, Nanako
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3771-4b349e67ddd6df76503d3afe59a3a5d121f14429c1df07dd1bb619d4d05007273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3771-4b349e67ddd6df76503d3afe59a3a5d121f14429c1df07dd1bb619d4d05007273
container_end_page 853
container_issue 9
container_start_page 847
container_title Geriatrics & gerontology international
container_volume 19
creator Mayers, Thomas
Kashiwagi, Shiho
Mathis, Bryan J.
Kawabe, Makiko
Gallagher, Joshua
Morales Aliaga, Maria L.
Kai, Ichiro
Tamiya, Nanako
description Aim The purpose of the present study was to collate examples of end‐of‐life care guidelines from various counties, examine their contents, and gain an overall picture of how end‐of‐life care guidance is offered to physicians and care providers internationally. Methods In this study, eight researchers worked independently to source and examine national‐level end‐of‐life care guidelines from different countries and regions. Data collected by each researcher were gathered into a unified table. The items in the table included basic information (publisher, year, URL etc.) and more specific items, such as the presence/absence of legal information and family's role in decision‐making. These data were then used to identify trends, and examine the mechanics and delivery of guidance on this topic. Results A total of 54 guidelines were included in the study. All the guidelines were published between 2000 and 2016, and 60% (n = 33) were published after 2012. The length of the guidelines varied from two to 487 pages (median 38 pages), and had different target audiences – both lay and professional. A total of 38 (70%) of the guidelines included information about the relevant laws and legal issues, 47 (87%) offered advice on withholding and withdrawing treatment, 46 (85%) discussed the family's role in decision‐making and 46 (85%) emphasized the teamwork aspect of care. Conclusions The present findings show that end‐of‐life care guidelines are generally made reactively in response to the trend toward patient‐centered care, and that to create effective guidelines and implement them requires multilevel cooperation between governmental bodies, healthcare teams, and patients and their families. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 847–853.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ggi.13741
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2269394660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2284942658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3771-4b349e67ddd6df76503d3afe59a3a5d121f14429c1df07dd1bb619d4d05007273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu3CAQhlHVqknTHvICEVIv7cEJGAzLMYqa7UqRemnPFmuGXSIWErCz2lsfoW-Qd8uTBNtJD5XKhflnPv0jzY_QKSXntLyLzcadUyY5fYOOKeeyIo3ib6eaV7RZiCP0IedbQqhUlL5HR4yyRanYMXpchR5S0L2LQXuc4MHBHkeLX1tPv_94eACPN4Mz4F2AjGPAEEyZRDuOnQXc6QR47_ottrEbJqTfzp1t9MaFDdbBTNokvR91WaJT76zrXNkchj65ceXEbQ-FGtVH9M5qn-HTy3-Cfl1_-3n1vbr5sVxdXd5UHZOSVnzNuAIhjTHCWCkawgzTFhqlmW4Mraktx6hVR40lhaLrtaDKcEMaQmQt2Qn6MvvepXg_QO7bncsdeK8DxCG3dS0UU1wIUtDP_6C3cSgn9CO14IrXolkU6utMdSnmnMC2d8ntdDq0lLRjam1JrZ1SK-zZi-Ow3oH5S77GVICLGdg7D4f_O7XL5Wq2fAZaz6a5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284942658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International review of national‐level guidelines on end‐of‐life care with focus on the withholding and withdrawing of artificial nutrition and hydration</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Mayers, Thomas ; Kashiwagi, Shiho ; Mathis, Bryan J. ; Kawabe, Makiko ; Gallagher, Joshua ; Morales Aliaga, Maria L. ; Kai, Ichiro ; Tamiya, Nanako</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayers, Thomas ; Kashiwagi, Shiho ; Mathis, Bryan J. ; Kawabe, Makiko ; Gallagher, Joshua ; Morales Aliaga, Maria L. ; Kai, Ichiro ; Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The purpose of the present study was to collate examples of end‐of‐life care guidelines from various counties, examine their contents, and gain an overall picture of how end‐of‐life care guidance is offered to physicians and care providers internationally. Methods In this study, eight researchers worked independently to source and examine national‐level end‐of‐life care guidelines from different countries and regions. Data collected by each researcher were gathered into a unified table. The items in the table included basic information (publisher, year, URL etc.) and more specific items, such as the presence/absence of legal information and family's role in decision‐making. These data were then used to identify trends, and examine the mechanics and delivery of guidance on this topic. Results A total of 54 guidelines were included in the study. All the guidelines were published between 2000 and 2016, and 60% (n = 33) were published after 2012. The length of the guidelines varied from two to 487 pages (median 38 pages), and had different target audiences – both lay and professional. A total of 38 (70%) of the guidelines included information about the relevant laws and legal issues, 47 (87%) offered advice on withholding and withdrawing treatment, 46 (85%) discussed the family's role in decision‐making and 46 (85%) emphasized the teamwork aspect of care. Conclusions The present findings show that end‐of‐life care guidelines are generally made reactively in response to the trend toward patient‐centered care, and that to create effective guidelines and implement them requires multilevel cooperation between governmental bodies, healthcare teams, and patients and their families. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 847–853.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1444-1586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13741</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31389113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>artificial nutrition and hydration ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Decision-Making - ethics ; Clinical Decision-Making - methods ; decision‐making ; Elder care ; end‐of‐life care ; Fluid Therapy - methods ; Global Health ; Guidelines ; Humans ; International comparisons ; Nutritional Support - methods ; Palliative care ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Professional-Family Relations ; Terminal Care - ethics ; Terminal Care - methods ; Terminal Care - organization &amp; administration ; Terminal Care - trends ; withholding and withdrawing treatment ; Withholding Treatment - ethics ; Withholding Treatment - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><ispartof>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international, 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.847-853</ispartof><rights>2019 Japan Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2019 Japan Geriatrics Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3771-4b349e67ddd6df76503d3afe59a3a5d121f14429c1df07dd1bb619d4d05007273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3771-4b349e67ddd6df76503d3afe59a3a5d121f14429c1df07dd1bb619d4d05007273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5248-0865 ; 0000-0003-2947-2805</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31389113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayers, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Shiho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathis, Bryan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabe, Makiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales Aliaga, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kai, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><title>International review of national‐level guidelines on end‐of‐life care with focus on the withholding and withdrawing of artificial nutrition and hydration</title><title>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international</title><addtitle>Geriatr Gerontol Int</addtitle><description>Aim The purpose of the present study was to collate examples of end‐of‐life care guidelines from various counties, examine their contents, and gain an overall picture of how end‐of‐life care guidance is offered to physicians and care providers internationally. Methods In this study, eight researchers worked independently to source and examine national‐level end‐of‐life care guidelines from different countries and regions. Data collected by each researcher were gathered into a unified table. The items in the table included basic information (publisher, year, URL etc.) and more specific items, such as the presence/absence of legal information and family's role in decision‐making. These data were then used to identify trends, and examine the mechanics and delivery of guidance on this topic. Results A total of 54 guidelines were included in the study. All the guidelines were published between 2000 and 2016, and 60% (n = 33) were published after 2012. The length of the guidelines varied from two to 487 pages (median 38 pages), and had different target audiences – both lay and professional. A total of 38 (70%) of the guidelines included information about the relevant laws and legal issues, 47 (87%) offered advice on withholding and withdrawing treatment, 46 (85%) discussed the family's role in decision‐making and 46 (85%) emphasized the teamwork aspect of care. Conclusions The present findings show that end‐of‐life care guidelines are generally made reactively in response to the trend toward patient‐centered care, and that to create effective guidelines and implement them requires multilevel cooperation between governmental bodies, healthcare teams, and patients and their families. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 847–853.</description><subject>artificial nutrition and hydration</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making - ethics</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making - methods</subject><subject>decision‐making</subject><subject>Elder care</subject><subject>end‐of‐life care</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Nutritional Support - methods</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Professional-Family Relations</subject><subject>Terminal Care - ethics</subject><subject>Terminal Care - methods</subject><subject>Terminal Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Terminal Care - trends</subject><subject>withholding and withdrawing treatment</subject><subject>Withholding Treatment - ethics</subject><subject>Withholding Treatment - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><issn>1444-1586</issn><issn>1447-0594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu3CAQhlHVqknTHvICEVIv7cEJGAzLMYqa7UqRemnPFmuGXSIWErCz2lsfoW-Qd8uTBNtJD5XKhflnPv0jzY_QKSXntLyLzcadUyY5fYOOKeeyIo3ib6eaV7RZiCP0IedbQqhUlL5HR4yyRanYMXpchR5S0L2LQXuc4MHBHkeLX1tPv_94eACPN4Mz4F2AjGPAEEyZRDuOnQXc6QR47_ottrEbJqTfzp1t9MaFDdbBTNokvR91WaJT76zrXNkchj65ceXEbQ-FGtVH9M5qn-HTy3-Cfl1_-3n1vbr5sVxdXd5UHZOSVnzNuAIhjTHCWCkawgzTFhqlmW4Mraktx6hVR40lhaLrtaDKcEMaQmQt2Qn6MvvepXg_QO7bncsdeK8DxCG3dS0UU1wIUtDP_6C3cSgn9CO14IrXolkU6utMdSnmnMC2d8ntdDq0lLRjam1JrZ1SK-zZi-Ow3oH5S77GVICLGdg7D4f_O7XL5Wq2fAZaz6a5</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Mayers, Thomas</creator><creator>Kashiwagi, Shiho</creator><creator>Mathis, Bryan J.</creator><creator>Kawabe, Makiko</creator><creator>Gallagher, Joshua</creator><creator>Morales Aliaga, Maria L.</creator><creator>Kai, Ichiro</creator><creator>Tamiya, Nanako</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-0865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2947-2805</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>International review of national‐level guidelines on end‐of‐life care with focus on the withholding and withdrawing of artificial nutrition and hydration</title><author>Mayers, Thomas ; Kashiwagi, Shiho ; Mathis, Bryan J. ; Kawabe, Makiko ; Gallagher, Joshua ; Morales Aliaga, Maria L. ; Kai, Ichiro ; Tamiya, Nanako</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3771-4b349e67ddd6df76503d3afe59a3a5d121f14429c1df07dd1bb619d4d05007273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>artificial nutrition and hydration</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making - ethics</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making - methods</topic><topic>decision‐making</topic><topic>Elder care</topic><topic>end‐of‐life care</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Nutritional Support - methods</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Professional-Family Relations</topic><topic>Terminal Care - ethics</topic><topic>Terminal Care - methods</topic><topic>Terminal Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Terminal Care - trends</topic><topic>withholding and withdrawing treatment</topic><topic>Withholding Treatment - ethics</topic><topic>Withholding Treatment - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayers, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Shiho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathis, Bryan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawabe, Makiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales Aliaga, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kai, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamiya, Nanako</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayers, Thomas</au><au>Kashiwagi, Shiho</au><au>Mathis, Bryan J.</au><au>Kawabe, Makiko</au><au>Gallagher, Joshua</au><au>Morales Aliaga, Maria L.</au><au>Kai, Ichiro</au><au>Tamiya, Nanako</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International review of national‐level guidelines on end‐of‐life care with focus on the withholding and withdrawing of artificial nutrition and hydration</atitle><jtitle>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international</jtitle><addtitle>Geriatr Gerontol Int</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>853</epage><pages>847-853</pages><issn>1444-1586</issn><eissn>1447-0594</eissn><abstract>Aim The purpose of the present study was to collate examples of end‐of‐life care guidelines from various counties, examine their contents, and gain an overall picture of how end‐of‐life care guidance is offered to physicians and care providers internationally. Methods In this study, eight researchers worked independently to source and examine national‐level end‐of‐life care guidelines from different countries and regions. Data collected by each researcher were gathered into a unified table. The items in the table included basic information (publisher, year, URL etc.) and more specific items, such as the presence/absence of legal information and family's role in decision‐making. These data were then used to identify trends, and examine the mechanics and delivery of guidance on this topic. Results A total of 54 guidelines were included in the study. All the guidelines were published between 2000 and 2016, and 60% (n = 33) were published after 2012. The length of the guidelines varied from two to 487 pages (median 38 pages), and had different target audiences – both lay and professional. A total of 38 (70%) of the guidelines included information about the relevant laws and legal issues, 47 (87%) offered advice on withholding and withdrawing treatment, 46 (85%) discussed the family's role in decision‐making and 46 (85%) emphasized the teamwork aspect of care. Conclusions The present findings show that end‐of‐life care guidelines are generally made reactively in response to the trend toward patient‐centered care, and that to create effective guidelines and implement them requires multilevel cooperation between governmental bodies, healthcare teams, and patients and their families. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 847–853.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>31389113</pmid><doi>10.1111/ggi.13741</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-0865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2947-2805</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1444-1586
ispartof Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.847-853
issn 1444-1586
1447-0594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2269394660
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects artificial nutrition and hydration
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Decision-Making - ethics
Clinical Decision-Making - methods
decision‐making
Elder care
end‐of‐life care
Fluid Therapy - methods
Global Health
Guidelines
Humans
International comparisons
Nutritional Support - methods
Palliative care
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Professional-Family Relations
Terminal Care - ethics
Terminal Care - methods
Terminal Care - organization & administration
Terminal Care - trends
withholding and withdrawing treatment
Withholding Treatment - ethics
Withholding Treatment - legislation & jurisprudence
title International review of national‐level guidelines on end‐of‐life care with focus on the withholding and withdrawing of artificial nutrition and hydration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A16%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20review%20of%20national%E2%80%90level%20guidelines%20on%20end%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90life%20care%20with%20focus%20on%20the%20withholding%20and%20withdrawing%20of%20artificial%20nutrition%20and%20hydration&rft.jtitle=Geriatrics%20&%20gerontology%20international&rft.au=Mayers,%20Thomas&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=853&rft.pages=847-853&rft.issn=1444-1586&rft.eissn=1447-0594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ggi.13741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2284942658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3771-4b349e67ddd6df76503d3afe59a3a5d121f14429c1df07dd1bb619d4d05007273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284942658&rft_id=info:pmid/31389113&rfr_iscdi=true