Loading…
Beware of Economists Bearing Greek Symbols
Economists love formal mathematics much more than physicists do. Many economic journals encourage a faux-rigorous style with multitudes of axioms and lemmas in numbers that tend to be inversely proportional to their efficacy in the real world. But economists seem to have embraced formality and physi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Harvard business review 2005-10, Vol.83 (10), p.16 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Harvard business review |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Derman, Emanuel |
description | Economists love formal mathematics much more than physicists do. Many economic journals encourage a faux-rigorous style with multitudes of axioms and lemmas in numbers that tend to be inversely proportional to their efficacy in the real world. But economists seem to have embraced formality and physics envy without the corresponding benefits of accuracy or predictability. In economics, there are no laws at all, only models, and you're immensely lucky if you can predict up from down. Never forget that even the best financial model can never be truly valid because, unlike the physical world, the mental world of securities and economics is much less amenable to the power of mathematics. |
format | magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_227845141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>903407371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p187t-73bcdfb5ed1033ebef069530d0e2b84c5fe93d78f826fddaffc2bb9420e619893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1rAjEUAHOoUGv7H3IrCAsvye4mOVaxKggetGfJx3vFdt3oZkX89wo6l7kN88KGAEIXBoR8ZW85_8GdWpshG0_w4jrkifgspDYd9rnPfIKu27e_fN4h_vPN9eBTk9_ZgFyT8ePpEfv5nm2ni2K1ni-nX6viKIzuC618iOQrjAKUQo8Eta0UREDpTRkqQquiNmRkTTE6oiC9t6UErIU1Vo3Y56N77NLpjLnf3acCNo1rMZ3zTkptykqUQt0Agrw-iA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>227845141</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Beware of Economists Bearing Greek Symbols</title><source>EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Derman, Emanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Derman, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><description>Economists love formal mathematics much more than physicists do. Many economic journals encourage a faux-rigorous style with multitudes of axioms and lemmas in numbers that tend to be inversely proportional to their efficacy in the real world. But economists seem to have embraced formality and physics envy without the corresponding benefits of accuracy or predictability. In economics, there are no laws at all, only models, and you're immensely lucky if you can predict up from down. Never forget that even the best financial model can never be truly valid because, unlike the physical world, the mental world of securities and economics is much less amenable to the power of mathematics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Harvard Business Review</publisher><subject>Differences ; Economists ; Mathematics ; Physicists</subject><ispartof>Harvard business review, 2005-10, Vol.83 (10), p.16</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derman, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><title>Beware of Economists Bearing Greek Symbols</title><title>Harvard business review</title><description>Economists love formal mathematics much more than physicists do. Many economic journals encourage a faux-rigorous style with multitudes of axioms and lemmas in numbers that tend to be inversely proportional to their efficacy in the real world. But economists seem to have embraced formality and physics envy without the corresponding benefits of accuracy or predictability. In economics, there are no laws at all, only models, and you're immensely lucky if you can predict up from down. Never forget that even the best financial model can never be truly valid because, unlike the physical world, the mental world of securities and economics is much less amenable to the power of mathematics.</description><subject>Differences</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><issn>0017-8012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjk1rAjEUAHOoUGv7H3IrCAsvye4mOVaxKggetGfJx3vFdt3oZkX89wo6l7kN88KGAEIXBoR8ZW85_8GdWpshG0_w4jrkifgspDYd9rnPfIKu27e_fN4h_vPN9eBTk9_ZgFyT8ePpEfv5nm2ni2K1ni-nX6viKIzuC618iOQrjAKUQo8Eta0UREDpTRkqQquiNmRkTTE6oiC9t6UErIU1Vo3Y56N77NLpjLnf3acCNo1rMZ3zTkptykqUQt0Agrw-iA</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Derman, Emanuel</creator><general>Harvard Business Review</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Beware of Economists Bearing Greek Symbols</title><author>Derman, Emanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p187t-73bcdfb5ed1033ebef069530d0e2b84c5fe93d78f826fddaffc2bb9420e619893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Differences</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derman, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derman, Emanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beware of Economists Bearing Greek Symbols</atitle><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>16</spage><pages>16-</pages><issn>0017-8012</issn><abstract>Economists love formal mathematics much more than physicists do. Many economic journals encourage a faux-rigorous style with multitudes of axioms and lemmas in numbers that tend to be inversely proportional to their efficacy in the real world. But economists seem to have embraced formality and physics envy without the corresponding benefits of accuracy or predictability. In economics, there are no laws at all, only models, and you're immensely lucky if you can predict up from down. Never forget that even the best financial model can never be truly valid because, unlike the physical world, the mental world of securities and economics is much less amenable to the power of mathematics.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Harvard Business Review</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-8012 |
ispartof | Harvard business review, 2005-10, Vol.83 (10), p.16 |
issn | 0017-8012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_227845141 |
source | EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate |
subjects | Differences Economists Mathematics Physicists |
title | Beware of Economists Bearing Greek Symbols |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T08%3A41%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beware%20of%20Economists%20Bearing%20Greek%20Symbols&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20business%20review&rft.au=Derman,%20Emanuel&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=16&rft.pages=16-&rft.issn=0017-8012&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E903407371%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p187t-73bcdfb5ed1033ebef069530d0e2b84c5fe93d78f826fddaffc2bb9420e619893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227845141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |